User talk:Etienne

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Etienne!

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prothyrum-Cathedral-Lodi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Berthold Werner 15:35, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Open-sky-bifora-SanFrancesco-Lodi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. -- H005 13:52, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Gleno 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments if you look at the original and it's picture in the lake it's tilted --Mbdortmund 10:51, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Does it look better now? -- Etienne 16:48, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am not shure but difficult to measure it exactly --Mbdortmund 16:26, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for the advice! -- Etienne 09:07, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gleno Dam 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rose-window-Cathedral-Lodi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gentiana punctata MtAlto1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments the flower looks good but strange bukeh; postproduction fault? --Mbdortmund 16:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No post production at all here! :) -- Etienne 19:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This effect creates the dew drops in the sun. It is difficult to take photos of high meadows. Is right for me. - Darius Baužys 07:46, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gentiana acaulis L. 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Much better than Campanula barbata . QI for me. - Darius Baužys 07:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! -- Etienne 12:53, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SanFrancesco-Lodi-church-tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspective distortion is acceptable here (camera directed upwards). --Cayambe 14:20, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anser albifrons.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. In the descr., could you please add the place where the animals are living (if still alive :-)). --Cayambe 16:21, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done -- Etienne 20:46, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pensa-MK-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Given the light conditions, the blown hair is acceptable here IMO. --Cayambe 16:21, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anser albifrons[edit]

Please see File_talk:Anser_albifrons.JPG. Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:04, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presolana 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. QI then IMO. --Cayambe 09:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ficus bud.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Info there is a dead pixel and at 100% it's a litle bit blur perhaps due to too low speed and wind ? i put à mark on the dead pixel if you want to correct it --Croucrou 20:58, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you! -- Etienne 06:32, 15 April 2010 (UTC) Supportnow it's QI IMO --Croucrou 16:53, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calendula officinalis L.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Incoronata-interior-dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good details and colours --Mbdortmund 11:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC) maybe a bad crop below ?--Jebulon 09:47, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio dalla Commissione Borse Alessio Guidetti

Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno.

Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione.
Potete trovare il bando di partecipazione con tutti i dettagli a questo link.
La scadenza è il 30 aprile 2016, ore 23:59 CEST.

Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento
Grazie, e un sincero augurio di buon lavoro e buon divertimento sull'enciclopedia libera :-)


per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste


Alexmar983 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]