User talk:Erikven96

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Erikven96!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:03, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:2015 Tatiana Gelfand.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 06:03, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tatiana Gelfand.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tatiana Gelfand.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roger, I am brand new to Wikipedia and I am having a very hard time figuring out how this thing works from this side. So the picture was taken by Tatiana herself in her studio, and was given to me to be used in the article I am trying to create about her. (she's a theatrical and film director/playwright) This may not be the original pic, but this is what she gave me. The resolution is 640x640 and this is the only version I have, and I think it's perfectly enough for this particular purpose. If this is a problem I am sure she has other pics that are higher res. I thought Wikipedia was for anyone to work with, who can use a computer. I have no programming experience and I don't even understand most of the language used here. Like even though I understand the individual words, I have no idea what "attributed to the subject without mention of a timer" actually means. The text I copy/pasted into the description field was what I thought to be a copyright release text which popped up when I looked at this message thread earlier yesterday. In my desperate attempt to make sense of any of this I thought that it was the text I was required to put in the description field to save it from being deleted. So far it hasn't been deleted, which made me think it worked. I was trying to read the help files and the tutorials but when I didn't understand even the first two sentences, I have decided to go by trial and error, which is very frustrating and time consuming. I'm sure I'll figure it out eventually.

Thank you for your comment, and if you have any advice on how I can make the vigilant protectors of Wikipedia believe that I am not infringing on anyone sacred birthrights, I'd love to hear it.

Erik Ven

Timer (whatever that means): 6:45am, on a sunny Friday in a Starbucks in Las Vegas --Erikven96 (talk) 14:12, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your postings[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  italiano  日本語  português  русский  українська  +/−
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 23:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your postings[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  italiano  日本語  português  русский  українська  +/−
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 13:52, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:4838176 640x640.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

De728631 (talk) 02:56, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not reupload this image. We need permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. This is most likely the original photographer and not Tatiana Gelfand, because copyright usually does not belong to the subject portrayed in a photo. Please see COM:OTRS on instructions how to send a permission by email. De728631 (talk) 03:00, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


RESPONSE to the message above----

Thank you for your message. Please note - In the past hour, Tatiana Gelfand - who is both depicted in and is the owner of the image - since it is a self-portait - has sent a release through the Interactive Release Generator to the email permissions-commons@wikimedia.org along with this image. This image is now in the Creative Commons Public Domain.

Please let me know if there is any further action that she or I need to take to have this image approved to the wiki article.

Thank you. --Erikven96 (talk) 03:25, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reply. Once the permission email has been approved by our volunteers, the image will be restored. Due to a massive backlog, this may take up to 100 days though. De728631 (talk) 03:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:4838176 640x640.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

4nn1l2 (talk) 08:49, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so this is the fifth time this is happening even though we are carefully following your instructions:

I've been told to have the owner of the image (Tatiana Gelfand) issue a release through the Wikimedia OTRS release generator. She did exactly so on 7/6 and I have informed you of this here: "Thank you for your message. Please note - In the past hour, Tatiana Gelfand - who is both depicted in and is the owner of the image - since it is a self-portait - has sent a release through the Interactive Release Generator to the email permissions-commons@wikimedia.org along with this image. This image is now in the Creative Commons Public Domain.

Please let me know if there is any further action that she or I need to take to have this image approved to the wiki article.

Thank you. --Erikven96 (talk) 03:25, 6 July 2018 (UTC)"

Despite this, one of your full time picture deleters Responded this and deleted the picture nevertheless:

"Thank you for reply. Once the permission email has been approved by our volunteers, the image will be restored. Due to a massive backlog, this may take up to 100 days though. De728631 (talk) 03:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)"

Then we Tatiana have received this message:

"Dear Tatiana Gelfand,

Thank you for your permission to use media files on Wikimedia Commons.

In order for us to process your contribution, we need to know the specific name or URL of the page on Wikimedia Commons to which you have uploaded it, or the user name used to upload.

If you have NOT yet uploaded, please continue to upload the file(s) and let us know when done.

Yours sincerely, Arthur Crombez"

Since at the time of this latest message the image was already deleted, following Arthur Crombez' advice I uploaded the image, and Tatiana sent him teh URL. Now you're again threatening to delete it.

I was wondering if this is the standard operating procedure here, or is there some kind of screwup going on on either side.

I am trying to comply but this is very frustrating and discouraging.

Please advise what kind of other hoops we need to jump through before you guys finally get settled and believe that no malicious world order threatening copyright infringement conspiracy is going on here.

Thank you

Erik --Erikven96 (talk) 14:59, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Even if the file is deleted, you still got the file name as can be seen in the red links above: File:4838176 640x640.jpg. And it is in fact our standard procedure that we delete images with an insufficient permission until our volunteer email department has given a clearance. Please do not upload this again. It will be restored once the permission has been settled. We are all volunteers here (no full-time personnel at all), so things may take some time. Apart from that, we get loads of images with fake licenses uploaded by impostors each day, so we need to assure that the copyright and licence is verified. This not a trivial matter but a legal requirement which in the end helps photographers to secure their rights. De728631 (talk) 15:56, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OKay, but if one volunteer (Arthur Crombez) tells us to "In order for us to process your contribution, we need to know the specific name or URL of the page on Wikimedia Commons to which you have uploaded it, or the user name used to upload. If you have NOT yet uploaded, please continue to upload the file(s) and let us know when done." and the other one (you) is telling us "Please do not upload this again." who should we listen to? Thanks --Erikven96 (talk) 16:13, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think you misunderstood Arthur's sentence. He wrote: "If you have NOT yet uploaded the file..." That means "If you never uploaded it before, please do so now." But had uploaded the same image before twice, so that's why this advice was not valid any more. De728631 (talk) 16:26, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]