User talk:Engelberthumperdink/Archives/2019/1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:Harold Lee-Dillon, 17th Viscount Dillon.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yours sincerely, Marcus Cyron (talk) 12:17, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Valdai International Discussion Club 2019 (1).jpg
Copyright status: File:Valdai International Discussion Club 2019 (1).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Valdai International Discussion Club 2019 (1).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Valdai International Discussion Club 2019 (10).jpg
- File:Valdai International Discussion Club 2019 (11).jpg
- File:Valdai International Discussion Club 2019 (12).jpg
- File:Valdai International Discussion Club 2019 (13).jpg
- File:Valdai International Discussion Club 2019 (14).jpg
- File:Valdai International Discussion Club 2019 (2).jpg
- File:Valdai International Discussion Club 2019 (3).jpg
- File:Valdai International Discussion Club 2019 (4).jpg
- File:Valdai International Discussion Club 2019 (5).jpg
- File:Valdai International Discussion Club 2019 (6).jpg
- File:Valdai International Discussion Club 2019 (7).jpg
- File:Valdai International Discussion Club 2019 (8).jpg
- File:Valdai International Discussion Club 2019 (9).jpg
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:36, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
File:Graffiti Bulak (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Graffiti Bulak (3).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Graffiti Bulak (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, VLu (talk) 10:18, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Please remain calm and collegial
--VLu (talk) 12:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Я не очень разбираюсь в этих всех авторских правах, которых до черта. Однако логика подсказывает, что фото, сделанные 70 лет и без заявленного авторства, находятся в свободном доступе для всех. Вместо того чтоб сразу выставлять на удаление, можно было посоветовать какой шаблон наиболее подходит к загруженным файлам чтобы сохранить их для всех пользователей Википедии на Викискладе, а не только для пользователей русскоязычной Википедии. Вот это я и считаю предупредительностью. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 12:11, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- С удовольствием бы, если бы он был. Но для работ с неизвестным автором, впервые опубликованных в СССР после [2019–70=]1949 года, отсчёт 70 лет идёт от даты первой публикации. Скажем, опубликовано в 1991 году — несвободно до 2061-го. --VLu (talk) 12:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- То есть, государству Российская Федерация в лице Генеральной прокуратуры Российской Федерации принадлежат авторские права на фотографию Арцезо в немецкой форме, сделанную в Третьем рейхе в 1942—1945 годах? Поразительно... --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 12:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Поразительно, что именно вы предоставили этот источник как место первой публикации, потом установили совершенно необоснованную лицензию, а теперь удивляетесь собственным поступкам. Если [разговоры про] обвинения во лжи и прочие неэтичные выпады продолжатся, запрос на ваше поведение уйдет к администраторам. --VLu (talk) 12:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- В каком именно месте я обвинил вас во лжи? --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 12:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Уточнил свою фразу дополнением в квадратных скобках. --VLu (talk) 12:47, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- В каком именно месте я обвинил вас во лжи? --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 12:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Поразительно, что именно вы предоставили этот источник как место первой публикации, потом установили совершенно необоснованную лицензию, а теперь удивляетесь собственным поступкам. Если [разговоры про] обвинения во лжи и прочие неэтичные выпады продолжатся, запрос на ваше поведение уйдет к администраторам. --VLu (talk) 12:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- То есть, государству Российская Федерация в лице Генеральной прокуратуры Российской Федерации принадлежат авторские права на фотографию Арцезо в немецкой форме, сделанную в Третьем рейхе в 1942—1945 годах? Поразительно... --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 12:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- С удовольствием бы, если бы он был. Но для работ с неизвестным автором, впервые опубликованных в СССР после [2019–70=]1949 года, отсчёт 70 лет идёт от даты первой публикации. Скажем, опубликовано в 1991 году — несвободно до 2061-го. --VLu (talk) 12:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)