User talk:El Grafo/Archive 7

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Category:Photographs

If you have the opportunity, would you return to Commons:Categories for discussion/2015/11/Category:Photographs? If I understand rightly, you opposed because the proposed rename would exclude some of the current subcategories, but I had not sought to exclude any of them; my point was merely to make it obvious that this was meant to be only a meta-category, excluding individual images. If you agree with that idea, any suggestions you have regarding a better name would be welcome, and if you disagree with the core of my proposal, it would help if you'd clarify that fact. Thanks! Nyttend (talk) 02:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

16:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

18:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

20:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Tribute Penny

Hi El Grafo,

I have opened an MVR for the Tribute Penny. Martinvl (talk) 21:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

20:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

18:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

16:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

19:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

22:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

20:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Johannes Nepomuk - relief (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support WOW! A feat indeed! Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:17, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Franziskus Eckersdorf Grundstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments El Grafo vouches for high quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:20, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rehturm, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

20:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

bitte nicht falsch verstehen!

Klar, das Bild ist schlecht, eher sehr schlecht. Keine Frage. Aber ich empfinde es deutlich im Projektrahmen. Es ist sogar so schlecht, daß man (z. B. in Wikiversity) zeigen könnte, wieviel man aus sowas mit extremer Bildbearbeitung herausholen kann, um im Extremfall vielleicht das Fluggerät bestimmen zu können oder um zu zeigen, daß man auch aus extrem schlechten Bildern was bauen kann, was verwendbar ist - wenn es gebraucht werden würde. Wir haben tausende Bilder, die die Welt wirklich nicht braucht, hier sehe ich es aber anders. --Ralf Roleček 21:44, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Keine Sorge Ralf, alles gut. Ich kann nicht ausschließen dass ich andernorts nicht auch schonmal in die andere Richtung argumentiert hätte. Wünschte nur du hättest Recht mit deinen tausenden, ich befürchte eher dass da noch ein paar Nullen am Ende fehlen ;-) --El Grafo (talk) 22:06, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayreuth - Spitalkirche Turm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:51, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plassenburg, Kulmbach from south (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 17:47, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayreuth 2012 - Centaurea cyanus 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

21:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Almert, aerial view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

20:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

23:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

16:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear El Grafo,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

18:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

16:18, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neptunbrunnen Bayreuth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:14, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bernecker Straße 11, Bayreuth, exterior view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

20:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

18:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

19:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ginkgo biloba (Gingko) shoot, cross-section.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

15:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)