User talk:El Golli Mohamed

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, El Golli Mohamed!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:32, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guepier d'europe au parc national Ichkeul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamant rose Salines de Thyna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:30, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gravelot à collier interrompu Salines de Thyna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Nice bird and picture. But I hate (almost) the third rule (if it is). When I look at this I have the feel I must push the head of the bird more to the left side more centrally. That can be fixed when you cut a bit of the left side. ;-) --Hockei 17:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buffles et hérons Ichkeul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:58, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cigogne blanche ichkeul©.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:35, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iles Kneiss (Sfax).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamants à séjoumi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice, very good composition and QI -- Spurzem 20:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Libellule rouge écarlate Crocothemis erythraea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cap negro2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:23, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapiteau dogga situé à la place de la rose des vents.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dogga mausolée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oudna amphi5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Right side is not really convincing, but overall just a tight QI to me --Poco a poco 21:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cap negro1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. (Sharpness could be better.) --XRay 16:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grande mosquée de testour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kholkhal argent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments For a one shot picture with just one flash it´s ok for me. --Hubertl 18:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khomsa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments *  weak I´m not really sure, if you may tilt it to the right, the upper line is straight. Third opinion appreciated. --Hubertl 20:28, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dogga forteresse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 18:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hzem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khlel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 05:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dogga temple 6 colonnes vue conntre plongée2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharpness just OK, could need a bit more light, otherwise good quality. --Hendric Stattmann 18:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forteresse Béja006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some magenta and green CA. Perspective not done. Fixable. --Cccefalon 17:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ New version El Golli Mohamed 22:55, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reworking. It is now good enough for QI. --Cccefalon 05:51, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forteresse Béja007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMO, it needs perspective correction. --C messier 16:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ New version El Golli Mohamed 13:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Support Not perfect, but I think it works for QI.--Jebulon 21:02, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you are being discussed at AN/U due to your seemingly bad faith opposes at Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. Thanks, Poké95 12:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Location?[edit]

Hi El Golli Mohamed - do you have a photo location for File:Goéland railleur Thyna002.jpg, please? - MPF (talk) 21:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is in Sfax Tunisia El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent, thanks! - MPF (talk) 10:21, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goéland railleur Thyna002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC).  Comment Lacking location data :-( MPF 21:16, 19 November 2015 (UTC)  Comment It is in Sfax, Tunisia El Golli Mohamed 21:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cochevis huppé001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Étourneau unicolore (Spotless Starling) Sturnus unicolor (Tunis- Tunisia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments For me good enough for QI. --Rolf H. 05:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goéland railleur Chroicocephalus genei - Slender-billed Gull (Tunis, Tunisia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 19:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Bonjour Mohamed, une récompense pour les belles œuvres que tu nous partages ! Merci beaucoup.

Habib M’henni aka — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aigrette garzette au lac sud de Tunis (site RAMSAR).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc national de Bouhedma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK now, I think. --Basotxerri 18:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Libellule écarlate (Crocothemis erythraea) mâle Ichkeul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI, the comment was actually for the frog picture, but worked also here :) --Poco a poco 18:29, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grenouille du Sahara -Pelophylax saharicus- Rana saharica. (Djebel El Haouaria Z.I.C.O).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I'd had cropped it a bit more, but ok overall --Poco a poco 18:28, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guêpier d'Europe Merops apiaster - European Bee-eater (parc national de l'Ichkeul).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:59, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guêpier d'Europe Merops apiaster - European Bee-eater (parc national de l'Ichkeul) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:52, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grèbes en parade nuptiale (Grèbe huppé Podiceps cristatus Great Crested Grebe) aux salines de Thyna (site RAMSAR).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments chromatic aberrations to be removed --A.Savin 08:15, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done CA removed --El Golli Mohamed OK. --A.Savin 20:18, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guêpier d'Europe Merops apiaster - European Bee-eater (parc national de l'Ichkeul) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guêpier d'Europe Merops apiaster - European Bee-eater (parc national de l'Ichkeul) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perfect! --Ermell 06:39, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@El Golli Mohamed: Do these images have artificial backgrounds? Charlesjsharp 22:10, 7 May 2016 (UTC) No, they have a natural background, it's a mountain behind with green surfaces and red surfaces and by changing the angle we can change the colour of the background--El Golli Mohamed
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear El Golli Mohamed,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Îles Kerkennah (Site RAMSAR) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is noise, but somewhat still OK4QI, very nice scenery anyway --A.Savin 13:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agrion à longs cercoïdes (Erythromma lindenii) Oued Medjerda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit noisy but ok overall. Please, include the species in the description/category --Poco a poco 19:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC) Comment The species is include it's Erythromma_lindenii --El Golli Mohamed 19:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc national de Jebel Chitana-Cap Négro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourterelle maillée au Parc National de l'Ichkeul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paysage parc national de l'Ichkeul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --A.Savin 18:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djebel El Haouaria (Zone importante pour la conservation des oiseaux en Tunisie).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are one of the 10 winners of Wiki Loves Earth Biosphere Reserves 2016[edit]

Dear El Golli Mohamed

I'm very pleased to tell you that your image has been selected as one of the 10 winning images of Wiki Loves Earth Biosphere Reserves 2016.

Your image has been entered into the international competition and will also be featured by UNESCO in a number of places:

  • On the Wiki Loves Earth Biosphere Reserves front page http://www.wikilovesearth.org/
  • On the UNESCO website on a page for the competition
  • On a post on UNESCO's social media channels

Because of the license Facebook uses we would like your explicit permission to share your photo there. If you are happy with this please let us know. Alternatively we can use Twitter and/or Instagram to share your image.

Many thanks and good luck in the international competition.

Best wishes

John Cummings (talk) 10:08, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HI @John Cummings: hello,sorry I read the message just now. Yes of course you can share my photo there. --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borj ghazi Mustapha003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:57, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borj ghazi Mustapha002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:31, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borj el Hsar Kerkennah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Horizon is tilted, sky could use some noise reduction and the file need a much better description. W.carter 20:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)✓ Done Denoising and Horizon are corrected El Golli Mohamed 22:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nice job. Good quality. --W.carter 09:44, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forteresse byzantine Youngua007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Tilted to the left, check the sea. --C messier 09:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)✓ Done Horizon corrected El Golli Mohamed 10:10, 1 October 2016[reply]
 Support OK now. --C messier 11:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Immeuble Ennouri004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Bousrour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:30, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borj ghazi Mustapha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you correct the perspective, please? --Basotxerri 18:46, 2 October 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done --perspective corrected El Golli Mohamed 21:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Now the upper palm leaves are disturbing. If you make a slight left crop, this should be OK. --Basotxerri 17:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC)✓ Done new cropEl Golli Mohamed 18:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
IMO it would have been sufficient to crop less as I only referred to the leaves on the extreme left, but it's OK now. --Basotxerri 19:52, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Bousrour002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:45, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Bousrour003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Dommage pour les gravats, mais c'est bon.--Jebulon 16:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meninx001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:45, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forteresse byzantine Youngua001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 05:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forteresse byzantine Youngua.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 05:08, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puit Boussrour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:51, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puit Boussrour002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:44, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Immeuble hbib bourguiba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forteresse byzantine Youngua002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:07, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forteresse byzantine Youngua004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:06, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borj El Hsar006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sky could use some noise reduction and the file need a much better description. W.carter 20:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done noise reduction of the sky and better description of the file El Golli Mohamed 20:38, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 09:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borj El Hsar005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sky needs a bit of denoising, some of the unsharp and noisy foreground should be cropped off, needs a much better description. Think you could do that? W.carter 20:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done new crop, better description of the file and sky denoised El Golli Mohamed 20:48, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 09:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thyna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:50, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thyna007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not very sharp but OK for me. Nice idea! --Basotxerri 16:09, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thyna004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Kroton 10:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remparts Sfax006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:12, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forteresse byzantine Youngua005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great photo but could you please write a little better description (as usual ;-) )? W.carter 13:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done better description of the file El Golli Mohamed 18:02, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it is. Good quality. --W.carter 10:04, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borj El Guennouni002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp photo from which quality is high enough for a Q1one --Michielverbeek 20:43, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ksar Berromdhan002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remparts Sfax003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remparts Sfax007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosquée de Sidi-Amor001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mausolé 3 martyrs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Immeuble Ennouri005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments - I don't really like this view being in such dark shade, but it's a good composition and a QI for me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thyna008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosquée de Sidi-Amor00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thyna005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rougequeue noir ( Parc national de l'Ichkeul ).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traquet rieur Oenanthe leucura - Black Wheatear (Ichkeul).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI in spite of a little focal weakness of your 150-600mm lens. Please write the Latin name of the species in italic, and inside parantheses after its vernacular name. And one more; please create two seperate description boxes for FR and EN languages. --Zcebeci 18:26, 30 October 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done Fixed for the latin name but sorry I don't know how to create separate description boxes. --El Golli Mohamed 19:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rougequeue noir (Phoenicurus ochruros) Black Redstart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 14:42, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You were right it is a Little Stint[edit]

File:Calidris alpina - Dunlin, Adana 2016-11-05 01-2.jpg I thought this was Calidris minuta and sought an expert view. Here it is Notafly (talk) 17:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your suspicions were well founded and your suggested ID is correct. This is indeed a Little Stint. It looks like a juvenile assuming First Winter plumage. As you can see it has a short, straight bill (Dunlin has a longer curved down bill), it is clean white from chin to under-tail coverts (Dunlin has a streaked breast), it is showing the characteristic "thumb prints" on each side of the upper breast (there is nothing resembling this on Dunlin) and besides other field points the bird in the photograph is showing the classic "split side crown" which is absent on Dunlin and can be a useful field character. A Dunlin would never appear as "clean -cut" as this. Have a look at Dunlins in Flikr where you will find a lot of pics of Dunlin in non-breeding plumages. Thomas Ennis

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cochevis de Thékla Ichkeul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouette rieuse (Black-headed Gull) Chroicocephalus ridibundus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:29, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear El Golli Mohamed,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Héron cendré avec une couleuvre viperine à Ichkeul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent capture. Good quality, in my opinion, considering the difficulty of the timing for the shot and the size of the file. -- Ikan Kekek 11:21, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guépier d'Europe ichkeul (Merops apiaster) European Bee-eater.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent photo.PumpkinSky 14:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent quality, but if you cropped, I think the crop is too tight top and bottom. Charlesjsharp 14:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
here another version,is it better? El Golli Mohamed 14:51, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
much better, see my vote at FPC. Charlesjsharp 22:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouette rieuse en vol au lac sud de Tunis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Good quality, in my opinion, though I'm not sure everyone will agree with me. -- Ikan Kekek 07:13, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cheveche d'Athèna Ichkeul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guépier d'Europeau parc national de l'Ichkeul 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is no description on the file page. Plus we don't know what this bird is--not the common name nor the Latin name. PumpkinSky 15:15, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. description added--El Golli Mohamed 17:21, 15 June 2017 (UTC)...Good now. PumpkinSky 18:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Tarier patre ichkeul.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tarier patre ichkeul.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Problem in VI[edit]

One nomination per scope. Otherwise it must be passed in the second table (MVR). --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Egretta garzetta ( Little egret ).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Le héron en VI[edit]

Tu fais de très belles images, maintenant soigne tes légendes; l’intérêt qui sera porté à ta photo est souvent proportionnel à la qualité de la légende. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Je te remercie et j'essayerai de mieux soigner mes légendes dans le futur. Je ne m'y connais pas encore très bien en termes de VI. Ma première nomination date juste d'une semaine :-) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:32, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ardea cinerea (Grey Heron) in flight with with viperine water snake.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Merops apiaster (European bee-eater) showing back feathers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saxicola rubicola (European Stonechat) male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phoenicurus ochruros (Black Redstart) female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Wiki Loves Earth 2018[edit]

Hello! Please activate an option to receive emails from other users in your Special:Preferences --アンタナナ 00:19, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Africa 2019[edit]

Dear El Golli Mohamed,

You have contributed in the past to the Wiki Loves Africa competition. Your images have helped people learn more about Africa and see Africa more clearly from an African perspective. Overall, nearly 5000 people like you have contributed to this photo contest, and contributed nearly 40000 images about Africa. Pictures from Wiki Loves Africa illustrate more than 7000 Wikipedia articles and they received... 278.859.973 views between 2015 through the end of 2018. WOW ! How does it feel to be part of this and really make a difference when it come to Africa representation on Wikipedia ?

This February, you have another opportunity to create beautiful photographs on the theme of "play" that could change how the world understands people and culture in your part of Africa.

Wiki Loves Africa is a annual public contest where people across Africa can contribute media (photographs, video and audio) about their environment to Wikimedia Commons for use on Wikipedia and other project websites of the Wikimedia Foundation.

When does it take place?
The 2019 competition will start on 1st February 2019 and close on 1st March 2019.

What should we contribute?
Pictures ! audios ! videos ! The theme for the 2019 contest is... Play.
This theme encompasses a host of approaches and is intentionally open to interpretation. The theme Play! encourages the submission of visual representations of joyful and serious games, sport, and recreation in the form of board or mental games, physical fun or contests, playful interactions, theatrical and musical performances, etc.

In addition to the value your photos contribute to human understanding and african visibility on the Internet, there are several prizes on offer – including two separate prize categories for photos and media that encompass

  • (a) capture Women in sport or
  • (b) culturally specific and traditional formal forms of play, recreation or events.

For rules and information about how to participate, or to join the contest, click on: Contribute to the Wiki Loves Africa photo contest.

Warmest,

Anthere, for the Wiki Loves Africa Team

++++++++++

Cher ou chère El Golli Mohamed,

Par le passé, vous avez participé au concours photographique Wiki Loves Africa. Vos photos ont aidé de nombreuses personnes à mieux comprendre l'Afrique et à la voir sous un autre angle, l'angle des africains eux-même. Depuis sa création en 2014, près de 5000 personnes ont contribué au concours photo, en ajoutant près de 40000 photos relatives à l'Afrique. 5000 personnes, dont vous, qui ont fait une vraie différence sur la représentation de l'Afrique sur Wikipédia et en ligne. Mieux encore... ces photos illustrent aujourd'hui près de 7000 articles Wikipédia et totalisent 278.859.973 vues entre 2015 et fin 2018 !

Ce mois de février vous avez à nouveau l'opportunité de proposer de fabuleuses illustrations sur le thème du "Jeu", qui participeront à changer la façon dont les êtres humains à travers le monde comprennent les habitants et la culture de votre région..

Wiki Loves Africa, c’est un concours public annuel où chacun est invité à partager des illustrations via Wikimedia Commons, en rapport avec le thème de l’année, illustrations qui pourront être utilisées sur Wikipédia ou les autres sites de la Wikimedia Foundation.

Quand le concours se déroule t-il?
Le concours 2019 démarre le 1er février 2019 et cloture le 1er mars 2019.

Quelles sont les contenus attendus?
Des photos ! Des enregistrements audio ! Des vidéos ! Le thème du concours 2019 est ... Jouer.
Ce thème englobe de nombreuses approches, il est aussi intentionnellement ouvert à l’interprétation. Le thème Jouer ! encourage à proposer des représentations de jeux de détente et sérieux, du sport et des divertissements sous la forme de jeux de société ou de jeux intellectuels, d'activités physiques de divertissement ou de compétitions, d'interactions ludiques, de performances théâtrales ou musicales, etc..

En plus de la valeur intrinsèque que vos photos apporteront à la compréhension et à la visibilité du monde africain sur Internet, il y a de nombreux prix à gagner. Dont deux prix spéciaux pour les photos qui représentent

  • a) femmes et sport ou
  • b) formes de jeux, de divertissements ou d’évènements culturellement spécifiques ou traditionnels.

Pour plus d'informations, règles de participation et pour participer au concours, cliquez sur Contribuer au concours photo Wiki Loves Africa.

Bien à vous,

Anthere, pour l'équipe Wiki Loves Africa

Wiki Loves Africa 2020[edit]

Contribute to Wiki Loves Africa and to how the world sees Africa! Contribuez à Wiki Loves Africa et impactez la façon dont le monde voit l’Afrique!
Dear El Golli Mohamed

In the past, you contributed to the Wiki Loves Africa competition. This February, you have another opportunity to create beautiful photographs on the theme of "transportation" that could change how the world understands people and culture in your part of Africa. As with previous years, there are also many exciting cash prizes.

Wiki Loves Africa is an annual public contest where people across Africa can contribute media (photographs, video and audio) about their environment to Wikimedia Commons for use on Wikipedia and other project websites of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Images from the competition have helped millions learn more about Africa and see Africa more clearly from an African perspective. Overall, nearly 5000 people like you have contributed to this photo contest, and contributed 18,000 images about Africa.

When does it take place?

The 2020 competition will start on the 15th of February 2020 and close on 31st March 2020.

What should we contribute?

Pictures ! audios ! videos ! The theme for the 2020 contest is... Africa on the Move ! This theme encompasses a host of approaches and is intentionally open to interpretation. It encourages the submission of visual representations of movement or transportation, whether by path, road, sea air, by self-propelled, animal or mechanical means, or the historical or contemporary structures that have been created to facilitate movement or the transportation of people, goods, or animals.

In addition to the value your photos contribute to understanding and African visibility, there are several prizes on offer. The international prizes are:

  • 1st prize: US$1000
  • 2nd prize: US$800
  • 3rd prize: US$500

Additional categories are:

  • Culturally specific or traditional representations of transport or structures that facilitate transportation : US$500
  • Prize for best quality video: $500


Each winner will also receive a pack of goodies (proposed: a hat "I edit Wikipedia from Africa", a branded battery, stickers). Additional prizes will be available in some countries.

For rules and information about how to participate, or to join the contest, click on Contribute to the Wiki Loves Africa photo contest.

Warmest,

Anthere, for the Wiki Loves Africa Team


Cher ou chère El Golli Mohamed,

Au cours des années passées, vous avez participé au concours photographique Wiki Loves Africa. Ce mois de février vous avez à nouveau l'opportunité de proposer de fabuleuses illustrations sur le thème du "transport", qui pourraient profondément modifier la façon dont le reste du monde voit l’Afrique et comprend ses habitants et ses coutumes. Bonus, comme lors des années précédentes, il y a plusieurs prix à la clé.

Wiki Loves Africa un concours public annuel où chacun est invité à partager des illustrations via Wikimedia Commons, en rapport avec le thème de l’année, illustrations qui pourront être utilisées sur Wikipédia ou les autres sites de la Wikimedia Foundation.

Les photos collectées par le passé dans le cadre du concours ont aidé des millions de personne à mieux connaitre et comprendre l’Afrique et à la voir selon une perspective africaine. Au cours des dernières années, près de 5000 personnes comme vous ont contribué au concours, un total de 18,000 photos sur l’Afrique.

Quand le concours se déroule t-il?

Le concours 2020 démarre le 15 février 2020 et cloture le 31 mars 2020.

Quelles sont les contenus attendus?

Des photos ! Des enregistrements audio ! Des vidéos ! Le thème du concours 2020 est ... Le transport.

Ce thème englobe de nombreuses approches, il est aussi intentionnellement ouvert à l’interprétation. Le thème Transport ! encourage à proposer des représentations liées au mouvement ou au transport, que ce soit par la route, ou l’air, ou l’eau, de façon auto-propulsée ou avec l’aide de la force animale ou mécanique, ou bien également les structures architecturales historiques ou contemporaines qui sont à l’origine ou ont facilité le mouvement et le transport des êtres humains, des animaux ou des biens.

En plus de la valeur intrinsèque que vos photos apportent pour une meilleure visibilité et compréhension de l’Afrique à travers le monde, il y a de nombreux prix à gagner. Les prix internationaux sont les suivants:

  • 1er prix: US$1000
  • 2ème prix: US$800
  • 3ème prix: US$500

Catégories additionnelles:

  • Transport ou structures de transport traditionnelles : US$500
  • Prix de la meilleure vidéo: US$500

Chaque gagnant recevra également des cadeaux supplémentaires tels qu'une casquette "I edit Wikipedia from Africa", une batterie portable, des stickers... Des prix supplémentaires seront offerts dans certains pays.

Pour plus d'informations, règles de participation et pour participer au concours, cliquez sur Participer au concours Wiki Loves Africa.

Bien à vous,

Anthere, pour l'équipe Wiki Loves Africa

Study shows Wiki Love Africa recruitment makes a difference[edit]

Hello El Golli Mohamed

We are writing because you have participated in the Wiki Loves Africa (WLA) photo competition in the past. Results have been published and winning pictures may be seen here !

This year WLA partnered with the research organization CAT Lab (previously CivilServant) to help us evaluate the effectiveness of one of our recruitment efforts. You may or may not have received a message on your user talk page encouraging you to participate again in this year's competition.

We are excited to share with you their study found our recruitment message was a success and may have resulted in as many as 2,000 additional contributed photos. We hope you agree this is great news for Africa and its representation across Wikimedia. You can read more about the study and the results in this blog post.

If you have any questions about the study, we encourage you to ask CAT Lab's research manager Juliakamin(cs).

Anthere, for the Wiki Loves Africa Team

Wiki Loves Africa[edit]

Dear El Golli Mohamed

In the past, you contributed to the Wiki Loves Africa competition. You have another opportunity to create and submit beautiful photographs on the theme of "Health and Wellness" that could change how the world understands people and culture in your part of Africa. As with previous years, there are also many exciting national and international prizes.

For rules and information about how to participate, theme, or prizes click on Contribute to the Wiki Loves Africa photo contest or directly add picture from the button !

Warmest, Anthere, for the Wiki Loves Africa Team

Cher ou chère El Golli Mohamed,
Au cours des années passées, vous avez participé au concours photographique Wiki Loves Africa. Vous avez à nouveau l'opportunité de proposer de fabuleuses illustrations sur le thème de "la santé et le bien-être", qui pourraient profondément modifier la façon dont le reste du monde voit l’Afrique et comprend ses habitants et ses coutumes. Bonus, comme lors des années précédentes, il y a plusieurs prix à la clé !

Pour plus d'informations, règles de participation, le thème ou les prix, cliquez sur Participer au concours Wiki Loves Africa ou téléversez des photos en cliquant sur le bouton !

Bien à vous, Anthere, pour l'équipe Wiki Loves Africa

Wiki Loves Earth in Tunisia 2021 : Results[edit]

Hello @El Golli Mohamed

We would like to congratulate you for winning the 1st prize of Wiki Loves Earth in Tunisia 2021 competition. Thank you for your participation and contribution. To receive your prize please contact as via our Facebook page : https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesEarthTunisia/

Waiting for your reply, please accept my best regards. Houss 2020 (talk) 20:17, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Héron garde boeufs lac sud de Tunis.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Héron garde boeufs lac sud de Tunis.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kholkhal argent (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 12:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarier pâtre Parc national de Bou Kornine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 16:52, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rougequeue de Moussier Parc national de Bou Kornine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 16:52, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


You have rejected this image (and several others of mine) at QI, yet you have proposed two images at FP which are no sharper. The owl is nice but has a strange crop. The ibis is spft and lacks definition in the feathers and has an unfortunate white patch behind the head. Can I ask you to have another look, please? I don't want to start a war over inconsistent standards. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guépier d'Europe Ichkeul NP 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:23, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ibis falcinelle Soliman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 19:27, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vipère à cornes Chott Djerid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:23, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cheveche d'Athena Aqueduc de Zaghouan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:24, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orchidée Anacamptis papilionacea Haouaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:24, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FPC[edit]

You can only have two FPCs at one time. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Héron et aigrette Lac sud de Tunis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 21:36, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pluvier argenté lac sud de Tunis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Héron garde boeufs lac sud de Tunis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:47, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guépier d'Europe Ichkeul NP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 18:43, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand cormoran lac de Tunis016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 13:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perdrix gambra Lac de Tunis003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamants rose lac de Tunis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:13, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cheveche d'Athena Aqueduc de Zaghouan.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cheveche d'Athena Aqueduc de Zaghouan.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alouette bilophe Parc national Jbil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grande aigrette lac de Tunis002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 20:24, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Douiret2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 19:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sirli du désert Parc national Jbil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 16:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renard roux Ichkeul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:46, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cigogne blanche Ichkeul NP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:52, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guépier d'Europe ichkeul001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:52, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eremophila bilopha (Temminck's Lark).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

الطيور المغاربية[edit]

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله، أنا أعمل على قائمة الطيور في المغرب (سينقل العنوان ليشمل باقي دول المغرب) وكنت أود لو أن كل الصور من المنطقة المعنية وأنا فعلًا أستخدم بعض صورك ولكن هل يمكنك تنزيل المزيد؟ خاصةً أنني أرى صورك في صفحتك بالفيسبوك كثيرًا عثمان (talk) 12:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

وعليكم السلام و رحمة الله. إذا كان الاستعمال على الفايسبوك فلا بأس من النشر مع ذكر اسمي. اما اذا كان ذلك على الويكيميديا فيمكنك فقط استعمال صوري الموضوعة على الويكيميديا لا غير. لا أرغب في التفريط في حقوق الملكية الفكرية. ذلك العمل تطلب مني جهدا جبارا طيلة 13 سنة. ارجو تفهم ذلك و شكرا. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@El Golli Mohamed حسنًا أتفهم ذلك جيدًا. أنا أيضًا أخرج أحيانًا ومجرد رؤية نوع جديد وتصويره ولو بالهاتف يجعلني سعيدًا اليوم كله، فالخروج تحت الشمس في أرض وعرة مُتعب. أظن صورك المنشورة سلفًا قد تفي بالغرض.
بالمناسبة هل لديك أي كتاب أو شيء مشابه لطيور تونس؟ وأيضًا هل يمكنك الدخول للمقالة سالفة الذكر ووضع الأسماء المحلية التونسية التي تعرفها؟
وشُكرًا جزيلًا! عثمان (talk) 15:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion (not yet)[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Flamants à Thyna (Sfax).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flamants à Thyna (Sfax).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello El Golli Mohamed, I’m sorry but I had to strike out this result. Please understand this is in no way against your beautiful photograph – it’s just a question of the rules and of a technical error. The bot did close the nomination way too early. It should end on 17 April 2024 around 23:25 (UTC) and not earlier because the nomination has become public and active only on 23:25 (UTC), 8 April 2024‎. Therefore the discussion on the image should continue on the nomination page until 17th April.
Thank you for your understanding and sorry for all the confusion. We can avoid all that hassle easily when nominators add their new nomination to the list of active nominations quickly after creating the nomination subpage. Best regards, – Aristeas (talk) 06:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revenge votes[edit]

These have all been noted. Please try to be objective in your voting. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 14:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamants à Thyna (Sfax).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to the birds --Michielverbeek 17:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

This is not OK. --Yann (talk) 20:44, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Flamants à Thyna (Sfax).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flamants à Thyna (Sfax).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamants à Thyna (Sfax) edited.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]