User talk:Edoderoo/Archive2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Liedje Jean Droit[edit]

Hallo Edoderoo, ik heb de beschrijving van

File:Liedje Jean Droit.ogg
Liedje Jean Droit

aangepast omdat het gemarkeerd was om te verwijderen. Kunt u dat even nakijken en misschien de markering verwijderen.

Dank bij voorbaat Jaguaragd (talk) 16:26, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Monumentenlijst[edit]

Hallo Edo, heb je vorige week mijn email aan jou ontvangen over de monumentenlijst van Bodegraven-Reuwijk? groet --Agaath (talk) 13:44, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, ik heb 'm ontvangen, hij staat in mijn lijstje van dingen die ik nog moet doen. Maar afgelopen week zat ik voor mijn werk in Engeland, dus kwam er niet zo heel veel van terecht. Edoderoo (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oké --Agaath (talk) 18:44, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Edoderoo,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Hello, Please read the description before creating a DR. We don't care what is the license on Flickr, because the uploader there does not own the copyright. The photographer is Paul Boyer, who died in 1908. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:25, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've seen you deleted the speedy, thanks for that... I was too quick on this one, sorry for that! Edoderoo (talk) 09:27, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may have forgotten to add an OTRS tag to this image in April 2012, please check. --Denniss (talk) 21:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago the image was free, and this was stated on the weblink that is now the permission of the image. For some reason that text is not anymore on that page, and also the image is gone there. For me the image will still be free (once free, for ever free), but the evidence is taken away. Edoderoo (talk) 21:34, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, this discussion is on OTRS #2012041310008929 ... but that ticket number is not the actual proof itself like we usually get on OTRS. Therefor i haven't used the template, but gave the link. Unfortunately, people can change the internet. Edoderoo (talk) 21:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Found some info via Internet Archive and changed the license according to the info found there. --Denniss (talk) 21:47, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Edoderoo (talk) 21:48, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Serious mistake[edit]

Hi. You've been uploading several photos from 1968, and filling in the "date" field with today. That's wrong. The "date" field is for when the photo was created, not for when you uploaded it. I'm fixing the ones you've uploaded today; please be more careful next time. Thanks.

(Also, if you could give the files more descriptive names than just "Hvd-##", that would be very useful too.) DS (talk) 15:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did a mass upload (hmm, mass, 15 images) with the wizard. I didn't enter a date, it was auto-filled I guess. I will double check next time. Edoderoo (talk) 15:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ah! You're not the first person who I've cautioned against this error, but you are the first one to explain what happened. it's a flaw in the wizard; I've spoken to some WMF people in order to have that fixed. Might take a while, but at least now we know to ask. DS (talk) 19:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:3rd bio diagram.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:3rd bio diagram.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:3rd bio diagram.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This file originates from :en-wiki. The original uploader can be found there, I only moved it to commons for common use. Edoderoo (talk) 19:23, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, to this image you added OTRS permission. But there is still no license tag. Can you please investigate. Thx. --JuTa 10:54, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

True, and fixed. Thanks for reminding me. Edoderoo (talk) 11:30, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Jesse-faber-1406283465.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JurgenNL (talk) 08:46, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beste Edoderoo, Ik heb de foto van de gedenksteen van de Nederlandse atlete Mieke Pullen geüpload. De foto is je op 10 aug. jl toegezonden door de maker ervan, Kees de Kort, die toestemming heeft gegeven om deze foto op Wikipedia te gebruiken. Wil jij zorgen voor het OTRS template? Bij voorbaat mijn hartelijke dank. Groet, Piet.Wijker (talk) 13:34, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Waar?[edit]

Beste Edo, op deze pagina wordt bij de tweede foto geclaimd dat de foto van Wikipedia afkomstig is. Ik kan hem niet vinden, jij toevallig wel? Nu lijkt mij de foto publiek domien, hij is van rond 1900. Mag je zo een foto gewoon opladen? Wat moet je dan als bron geven? Dat blog? Vriendelijke groet, Corazón espinado (talk) 21:59, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

file:Skglb works train 1890.jpg komt het dichtst in de buurt. Gevonden met http://image.google.com Edoderoo (talk) 05:25, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dank je. Kennelijk is het een uitsnede. Corazón espinado (talk) 20:28, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Pim als Indiakok.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JurgenNL (talk) 13:36, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oké, zoals besproken op IRC. Edoderoo (talk) 17:57, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Günther-neefs-1401164675.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Günther-neefs-1401164675.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 16:58, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes I miss to copy-paste the ticket# of OTRS (2014052710003296 in this case). Just added it, thanks for letting me know. Edoderoo (talk) 19:33, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS[edit]

Hello, Thanks for your OTRS work, but this permission is invalid. It is not written in the mail that source = {{Own}} and author= InIT Lemgo. I have taken the ticket now. Se also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Juergen Jasperneite.jpeg. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:15, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This one was a tricky one from the start, as it didn't have the standard templates, and after the permission it kept being nominated. I will follow the ticket just to learn from it. Edoderoo (talk) 10:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Women's speedskaters from the Netherlands‎[edit]

Hi, first of all, English is not my native language, so I could be wrong. As far as I can see you created the category:Women's speedskaters from the Netherlands‎. Is this right, linguistically? It means Speedskaters of women. It sounds crooked. Shouldn't it be just Women speedskaters? Or Women's speedskating? --Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 15:42, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Female speedskaters ;-) Feel free to suggest to move the category. Edoderoo (talk) 18:56, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]