User talk:Drachentöter78/Archivo01
Image:Insecula-logo.png[edit]
This image has been deleted. You are not allowed to upload fair use logos from English Wikipedia to WikiCommons. Thank you. Thuresson 19:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Por_el_camino_de_Swann-Espasa-Calpe1920-02.jpg[edit]
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Por_el_camino_de_Swann-Espasa-Calpe1920-02.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 13:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
TUSC token 02278e343d7361fae2d5e1cb0847668a[edit]
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archivo01⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Autopatrol given[edit]
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 23:26, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]
Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]
- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Drachentöter78,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Re:Portada[edit]
Done. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Último aviso[edit]
Estos son los mensajes, que no se ha dignado contestar, borrados por el usuario Taichi en su discusión, «as a courtesy»:
Sanción[edit]
¿Tú crees que esta es una sanción apropiada, proporcional y justa? — Ketamino (talk) 15:43, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- De manera que tú crees que debo mantener en mi discusión estas agresiones («¿Comprendes de una vez? ¿Te enteras? ¿O son carencias idiomáticas? O quizás... ¿empecinamiento? O, o, o. Strakhov») pero ese mismo puede borrar tranquilamente una mera felicitación navideña? ¿A ti te parece normal? — Ketamino (talk) 15:48, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
De modo que no solo no contestas, sino que borras mi mensaje... Habiendo en mi caso en Wikipedia avalado el comportamiento contrario, respecto a un comentario, este sí, ofensivo. Realmente, tienes la cara de la consistencia del cemento, y ninguna fiabilidad como para seguir administrando nada allá. «Actively erasing personal messages without replying (if a reply would be appropriate or polite) will probably be interpreted as hostile. In the past, this kind of behavior has been viewed as uncivil, and this can become an issue in dispute resolution». Y encima dejas dicho que «as a courtesy»... — Ketamino (talk) 20:07, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Aclaro que recurro a este medio para solicitar explicaciones de un bloqueo en Wikipedia en español, porque es el único medio que veo que me queda al no haber dado el usuario explicación ni allí ni en otros medios en los que he intentado contactarle.
Si sigue insistiendo, pediré en Meta (no aquí) un bloqueo global. No me amenace... --Taichi (talk) 20:23, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- ¿Soy yo el que te está amenazando? Explícame de qué te estoy amenazando. En serio, explícalo. El único que me acaba de amenazar a mí acabas de ser tú. «In the past, this kind of behavior has been viewed as uncivil, and this can become an issue in dispute resolution»: y al borrar comentarios sin responder de una discusión estás TÚ faltando al respeto en primer lugar. — Ketamino (talk) 20:39, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Así ha quedado la cosa: después de no contestar y borrar un mensaje en su discusión, argumentando falsamente que le he amenazado y acosado, el usuario solicitó un bloqueo global en Meta, ni más ni menos. Obviamente, la cosa quedó en nada. Afortunadamente, Meta no es Wikipedia en español. — Ketamino (talk) 17:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Incívico, porque no contesta y borra los mensajes, pero ahí sigue, con sus botones para creerse alguien. — Ketamino (talk) 22:11, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Así contesta a otro bibliotecario el susodicho en la Wikipedia en español: «Buenas Roy, vengo aquí a dejar un mensaje de recordatorio: si existe un problema que involucra varios usuarios y bibliotecarios, sería bueno conversar con todas las partes. Dado que mi persona es parte de dicha ecuación, debiste ponerme al tanto de tus acciones. No voy a cuestionar el bloqueo/desbloqueo en sí, sino la forma en cómo evades a medias el problema para llegar a una conclusión. También sería bueno notificar a Cocolacoste, Jaluj, Fixertool y Strakhov, porque estos cuatro usuarios son la otra parte del problema que acarreó a Ketamino al bloqueo (y que ahora está desbloqueado), y que ahora a través de este ping lo sabrán. Pienso Roy, que es edificante tomar estas anotaciones y no repetir errores en el futuro. Saludos. Taichi 〒 22:22 8 sep 2017 (UTC)» Como se ve, todo modestia y simpatía («debiste ponerme al tanto de tus acciones», «tomar estas anotaciones y no repetir errores en el futuro»). Si no es para hacerle una RECAB y echarlo a patadas, no sé yo qué será. Qué será, qué será. — Ketamino (talk) 09:49, 18 November 2017 (UTC)