User talk:DoroshenkoE

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, DoroshenkoE!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, DoroshenkoE!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:48, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Seraja caplja Sejm.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Seraja caplja Sejm.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anatoliy (talk) 20:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hizhki 400.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hizhki 400.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anatoliy (talk) 20:56, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nymphaea alba Sejm.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nymphaea alba Sejm.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anatoliy (talk) 22:50, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pd-1 uav 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Brateevsky {talk} 18:17, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skyline SL-231 FLYGHT.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   02:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your remark and attention. I uploaded a new version of the photo - a similar one with metadata. If there is a question of authenticity I also have many other photos of this helicopter that had not been published anywhere before.--DoroshenkoE (talk) 20:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Зміни в категоріях областей[edit]

Вітання! До чого в областях цей шаблон? Навіщо людям, які цікавляться областю в Україні посилання на країни Африки, Азії тощо? І для чого категорії декад прибирати? І для чого сторіччя для областей — Тернопільська область буде тільки у двох сторіччях, як і інші області України. Для чого це все? Я вважаю це зайвим і вводитиме читачів у хаос у категоріях. Чи був консенсус щодо таких радикальних змін? Микола Василечко (talk) 11:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Доброго здоров'я @Микола Василечко! Дякую за увагу до категоризації. Я так розмію ви про редагування категорії Category:Ternopil Oblast in the 2020s, буду відповідати по пунктах.
1) Чи був консенсус щодо таких радикальних змін? - така категоризація і шаблони вже були в категоріх майже всіх областей України, тож я нічого нового не вигадував, а уніфікував.
2) Навіщо людям, які цікавляться областю в Україні посилання на країни Африки, Азії - шаблон про який ви говорите доданий для можливості навігації між категоріями всіх наявних категорій декад області (він їх відображає внизу шаблону). Згоден країни всього світу зайві, але спеціального шаблону під декади областей України немає, а цей найбліш підходящий.
3) для чого категорії декад прибирати - їх прибрав не, а я ви. Шаблон "Places by decade" автоматично додавав категорію декади, тож прибравши цей шаблон, ви прибрали категорію декади.
4) для чого сторіччя для областей - також не вигадував нового, за цим зразком вже були оформлені Київська, Полтавська, Чернігівська області. Також дана категоризація є в інших великих мовних розділах. Подивіться наприклад як це працює в італійській вікі - Category:Lombardy in the 21st century, в категорії сторіччя зібрано дуже багато інформації, і це точно не дві категорії як ви подумали.
З повагою DoroshenkoE (talk) 12:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
4)Перепрошую, але в Category:Lombardy in... аж ніяк нема того шаблону "Places by decade" з країнами Африки! Там є шаблон Lombardydecade, який подібний до Ternopil Oblast date і цього в таких категоріях якраз і достатньо. Тож пп. 2) і 3) я навіть і не коментую.
1)@Jbuket: Наскільки доцільний той шаблон у категоріях типу Oblast in the 2020s, якщо він навантажує посиланнями на країни, території і столиці, що дуже далекі від нашої конкретної області (ось у тих категоріях він доцільний), а також на загальні категорії області Architecture in · Architecture of · Buildings in · Cities in · Culture of · Economy of · Gardens in · Geography of · Maps of · Nature of · Panoramics in · Postcards of · Rivers of · Seasons in · Squares in · Streets in · Tourism in · Transport in ·? --Микола Василечко (talk) 12:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
4) @Микола Василечко, ви частково праві, частково помиляєтесь. Дійсно в італійському розділі не використовуєтсья "Places by decade" бо у них створено "Lombardydecade" який відображає наявні категорії декад та інші регіони Італії. Я якраз і писав вище, що у нас немає потрібног ошаблону. Шаблон "Ternopil Oblast date" зовсім не подібний до "Lombardydecade". "Ternopil Oblast date" дає посилання на категорії районів всередині області на відміну від "Lombardydecade" який дає посилання на інші області та інші декади даної області.
1) Доки не створено спеціального шаблону, то "Places by decade" все ж корисний для навігації. Звичайно, шаблон на зразок "Lombardydecade" був би кращим, так як не навантажує категорію зайвою інформацією. DoroshenkoE (talk) 12:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Я вдосконалив шаблон {{Ternopil Oblast date}}. Тепер у категоріях автоматично відображаються і області України і декади, і століття. І його ще можна вдосконалювати. Тож на категорії Тернопільщини не додавайте шаблону "Places by decade". Він хіба з панталику збиває. За цим принципом можна постворювати шаблони і для інших областей України. --Микола Василечко (talk) 14:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Микола Василечко дуже добре! Ще зверніть увагу, після допрацювання шаблону {{Ternopil Oblast date}} в ньому зламалася частина яка відповідала за навігацю всередині області. Зараз він вірно посилаєтсья на інші області України та на інші декади Тернопільської області, але не виводить громади та міста області потрібної декади. DoroshenkoE (talk) 14:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Тоді я наразі не знаю, як його поєднати. Зробив два окремих шаблони. --Микола Василечко (talk) 14:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]