User talk:Dodo/200612

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • This talk page has been archived. Please leave your comments at User talk:Dodo.

Fotos Evita[edit]

La mayoría de las fotos están escaneadas directamente del Archivo Grafico Nacional, de la Biblioteca del Congreso, o de la Biblioteca Nacional. Saludos. --Roblespepe 12:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Image:Piratey transparent background.svg[edit]

Why GFDL? I mean: if the original was donated to the public domain and there is no original artwork involved in this version, it must be under the public domain. Or am I wrong? --Dodo 12:18, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, the original image, en:Image:Piratey.jpg, is in fact tagged as PD. However, I used Image:Piratey, vector version.svg as my direct source, and therefore copied and pasted directly from that image description page; that is currently marked as GFDL, so I also made Image:Piratey transparent background.svg GFDL too. Zzyzx11 15:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

¿Puedes ...[edit]

... chequearme esta?. Gracias anticipadas. --Petronas 19:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Free license[edit]

Do you speak franch? It's abolutee free? Photos libres de droit means Photos without right. CaptainHaddock 21:45, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ETSAM logo.jpg[edit]

Curiosa explicación. --Ecemaml 22:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LogoTC.gif[edit]

Logotipo. --Ecemaml 20:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Y este otro también: Image:Darreu.jpg. --Ecemaml 21:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:240326907_657305e604_o.jpg[edit]

Somebody added a flickrreview to this image signed by you, but I cant find you in the edit history. [1] -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:32, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The description was copied from another image, which was incorrectly reviewed, see web link search. Image:Metasepia_pfefferi_2.jpg looks a lot like the Flickr image it gives as source, but is in fact not the same. The user must have thought of correcting this but didn't quite get there. --Para 10:34, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{Flickr}} tag[edit]

Hello,

Please don't put {{Flickr}} on images that were not uploaded by the FlickrLickr system. Thanks, Alphax (talk) 05:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry about that; I thought that it might have been somehow tied into the FlickrLickr or FlickrReview systems. It probably needs reworking with some #if: statements so that non-filled "reviewer" removes that entry from the table. Alphax (talk) 05:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think that would be OK. Alphax (talk) 13:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sarsfield[edit]

I took this from en.wikipedia and I belived that it was enough to indicate this origin; if I'm wrong, please tell me which is the correct procedure. Thanks, --mac 15:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answer. --mac 09:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

bandinicars[edit]

is true now?

Image:Copertina sports illustrated.JPG it's GFDL, because it's scanned from book Bandini (published in italy)

Image:Villacarrillo esc.gif[edit]

Mira, esta foto no tiene licencia y dudo muchisisísimo que el que la ha subido tenga derechos sobre ella, ya que la habrá sacado de esta página o de esta otra, y el creador del escudo es el mismo que ha hecho, como mínimo, los otros 96 escudos jiennenses. En tus sabias manos lo dejo. Johnbojaen 23:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Netzahualcoyotl[edit]

Hola Dodo. Yo ya estoy cansado. Te dejo el trato con nuestro simpático amigo. Sigue falsificando licencias, como ha hecho anónimamente con Image:Aldehuela.png (con la poca vergüenza habitual de negarlo) y luego ha subido algunas imágenes que a saber de dónde ha sacado. En fin... --Ecemaml 08:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Barcopiedra.png igual que Image:Aldehuela.png. En fin... --Ecemaml 10:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Más de 20 minutos[edit]

Image:IkerJimenez CarmenPorter.jpg. Ni me atrevo a mirar si lo ha hecho más veces... bueno, lo he hecho y sí, unas cuantas. --Ecemaml 15:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No author or source on Gs550e 01.jpg?[edit]

I'm having a hard time understanding the reason behind why you added the no source tag to Image:Gs550e 01.jpg. Maybe I'm not seeing something you are, but the author and source are pretty clearly stated as per Commons policies. I'm guessing it was a mistake, but I could be wrong. Can you shed some light on this issue? RichN (talk) 19:51, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also noticing you didn't notify the uploader of the file as instructed so you might want to do this. FYI, I'm the author of the file as already stated in the description. RichN (talk) 19:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cover magazine[edit]

i try to better explane this magazine was published in U.S.A in 1956 so it is in PD, check here (point 6.15) [[2]]

i don't have the magazine! the scanning is from Bandini Book so it "is renewed" under bandini book license. tkt OTRS 2006120410015872

¿Qué opinas de...[edit]

...esto? --Ecemaml 23:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know what means GFDL?[edit]

These picture aren't in PD because the author of book in wich are published has raleased under GFDL licence, you can read the permission OTRS number 2006120410015872 if you have an account there. GFDL are allowed in commons or do You prefer take the responsability to put them in PD and change the licence? In your opinion, you can choose to put an immage scanning from a book under PD? very strange point of view. Then, at terms of lows, in behind-cover of "Bandini" book, the author assume all responsability about pictures published in it! I can't explane better, sources are clear, permissions are good and responsability are clear...better of that,sorry but i don't know what do you want more. --Registro bandini 20:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rubens died in 1640 so, his right are expired, you can take a picture of his paint and published on your book, but i can't scan your book, your picture and copy, sell, or publish again Your picture without your consent as author of the book...even if your picture is or your book is old but not old enought to be PD right or wrong?

i tell you: right--Registro bandini 23:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I'm happy for your decision to low profile tone of discussion. i like it.

So:

  • the others pictures in Bandinicars category,are ok as GFDL or PD as they are now?
  • i'm quite agree to cancel the cover magazine, i has uploaded in en.wiki (Category:Bandinicars) can you check is are right now, there? i think that i can't use an image from en.wiki in italian wiki page, right?

Quite, because i continue to see the question from another side...

when you choose a tag in an immage you take the responsability about your declaration. if the pictures are evident PD, all right, but in opposite way you have to take the declaration as true. (how you can be sure about the author of a picture?) So i think it's better goes on for clear responsability istead presumed copyright. Presumed in this case because, i read in Car and Driver page that: "It was known as Sports Car Illustrated until the early-1960s, when editor Karl Ludvigsen renamed it to show a more general automotive focus. " So it fall in PD-usa because we presume it was not renewed after 1964 (not only THAT cover but even logo "sports car illustrated" doesn't exist from early 60' ), but it was renewed in Bandini book... where i scan it, so we should put it under GFDL... this example show us that it's more complicated and probably wrong goes on in "presume" way and it is more simply goes for responsability. in this way, it should be left in commons too. bye--Registro bandini 14:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sergio Rivero 2.jpg[edit]

Hola, el 13 de diciembre borrastes una imagen de Sergio Rivero que aparece en 20 minutos. El motivo que distes para el borrado es la licencia del periódico, que dice "Esta licencia no se aplica a los contenidos publicados por 20minutos procedentes de los terceros siguientes: Textos, gráficos, informaciones e imágenes que vayan firmados o sean atribuidos a Agencias, Reuters, Efe, Europa Press, Korpa, Atlas, France Press, AP, Lanetro, Meteotemp, TPI o J.M. Nieto". Sin embargo, la imagen es de Sergio González, que no aparece en el listado anterior. Forma parte de un set con motivo de un encuentro digital con el cantante en la redacción del periódico. Por tanto, creo que es aplicable la licencia cc-by-2.1 del periódico y debería ser recuperada. Saludos. Edub 15:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por restaurar las imagenes. No entendí tu segundo mensaje. El tal Sergio González siempre saca las fotos de los encuentros digitales, en la redacción o en un paseo por la calle. Yo creo que está en la plantilla de 20minutos. Saludos. Edub 16:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Imágenes de gva.es[edit]

Desconocía los modelos de mensajes de commons y usé una solicitud de uso de imágenes de Wikipedia. No sé si serán ellos los dueños de las imágenes o no, así que si es conveniente borrarlas, se eliminan. Ahora ya lo sé para la próxima vez. Un saludo y gracias. --JMPerez 23:37, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-Spain-Simple[edit]

Hola Dodo. ¿Qué opinas de tal plantilla? La traducción es errónea, puesto que omite citar lo que dice el libro I. ¿Opiniones? --Ecemaml 12:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"¿Molestamos a Petronas?" Pues claro, creo que debemos aclarar esto cuanto antes. --Ecemaml 11:22, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Más trabajo[edit]

A ver qué opinas de esto. Anna 14:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pos eso pensaba yo. Lo malo es que no se limita a esos dos casos, hay muchos más iguales. Anna 17:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Imágenes[edit]

Cuando vi que esa licencia era usada en otras imágenes -desconocía su existencia anteriormente- empecé a utilizarla. Siendo tan amablemente advertido por ti que no podía ser utilizada, dejaré de hacerlo sin ningún problema. Saludos cordiales. Flazzy 17:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Logo urjc.png[edit]

No cuela. --Ecemaml 17:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Imagen[edit]

Oye gracias por avisarme si sabia que tengo que especificar pero ayer que digamos anadaba apurado por desgracia y solo estaba copiando, asi que la modifico al instante y gracias, sigo trabajando en la mitologia griega (en los 2 personajes que eh trabajado han salido exelentes supere todas las otras versiones de wikipedia jajajaja). Saludos del Enriqueida

Listo!! checa la imagen de crisipo

ok voy a ver como hago a ver si puedo ver algun recurso que me permita utilizarla, a y no me llamo Enrique, ese es el nombre de mi parde =P

Leyendo ahi sale si el autor lo dona pasa a ser público, Paul Getty donó la vasija para un museo que es ahora parte del dominio público.

Meras fotografías[edit]

He dejado mi parecer en tan vago asunto. Sólo hay una sentencia del Tribunal Supremo y es algo así como "me escapo que no lo entiendo". La doctrina es clara: el art. 128 es una excepción que hay que demostrar caso a caso, porque los actos personalísimos a los que se refiere la sentencia son los derivados de los derechos de la personas que en España son derechos fundamentales bajo amparo constitcuional directo. ¿Cuando una fotografía no es un acto personalisimo fruto de la inteligencia del autor?. (tú inglés es mejor que el mío, así que si quieres se lo traduces). Saludos. --Petronas 00:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

La sección de ecemaml[edit]

Aquí el pobre Ecemaml dejará casos dudosos u obvios de borrado para su eliminación o aclaración:

  1. Image:Esta Sociedad Logo.JPG --Ecemaml 00:38, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Image:Guerra dos Mascates.jpg. La información de fuente hace imposible verificar la licencia. --Ecemaml 17:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Imagen:Logotipo jjll.jpg. Logotipo. --Ecemaml 20:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Todas las de User:JFP. --Ecemaml 13:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Image:BannerUCM1.gif. ¿Dominio público? --Ecemaml 16:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Image:Stadium avilesino coat of arms.svg. Logotipo --Ecemaml 14:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Las contribuciones de User:Q4767211492 que ha sacado de aquí. Mi impresión es que la nota de licencia:
Todos los derechos de propiedad industrial e intelectual del sitio web Sestao 200 Urte y de sus contenidos (textos, imágenes, sonidos, audio, vídeo, diseños, creatividades, software) pertenecen al Ayuntamiento de Sestao.
La persona usuaria puede visualizar todos los elementos, imprimirlos, reproducirlos, copiarlos y almacenarlos en el disco duro de su ordenador o en cualquier otro soporte físico siempre y cuando se respete el contexto original y no se modifiquen o alteren.
no son compatibles. --Ecemaml 19:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tengo tantas posibilidades de ser administrador aquí como tú de ser miembro del CRC XD --Ecemaml 23:14, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bueno, venga, me has convencido. Proponme cuando quieras (y no olvides hacerme publicidad, que así conseguiré muchos votos negativos :p) --Ecemaml 14:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cobarde XD --Ecemaml 20:51, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Más:

  1. Image:Logoa-1-.gif. Logotipo. --Ecemaml 22:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Image:Logo ciudadanos.jpg. Otro logotipo. --Ecemaml 23:26, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My Photo[edit]

Hello,

On file:Cinncinati_USA.jpg , it says you were the editor and you wrote the following comment:

This image, which was originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed by the administrator Dodo on November 30th, 2006, who found that it was currently available on Flickr under the license CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0, which isn't compatible with the Commons. It is unknown whether the license above was ever valid.

The photo (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tracylee/39720835/) is licenced under the Creative Commons license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/) which states that:

You are free:

to Share -- to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work

Under the following conditions:

Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor. Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.

That photo is fine for use, but it must be linked back to itself and credit given to me.

Thank you,

Tracy Lee Carroll 18:42, December 22, 2006‎

Image:Stadium avilesino coat of arms.svg[edit]

Saludos, me gustaría saber porque motivos has borrado el escudo del Stadium Avilesino, que yo sepa no está prohibido subir escudos de equipos de fútbol. Por si no lo sabes en concreto el Stadium Avilesino desapareció hace más de 70 años y esta versión en concreto está reconstruida por mi. Por lo tanto no creo que debieses haberla borrado, y por lo menos deberias haberte puesto en concreto conmigo para aclarar el asunto.--Mikel 11:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cuando puedas ...[edit]

...antes de que el autor se arrepienta, me cheas el atentado de Barajas. Saludos. --Petronas 17:10, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dodo/200612&oldid=680113027"