User talk:Diti/Archive/2009/January

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive This page is an archive of past discussions on User talk:Diti during the month of January 2009. Please avoid edits on this page, no longer watched.
List of archives:


File:Furry_Survey_2008.pdf

[edit]
File deletion warning File:Furry_Survey_2008.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

 — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 20:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of your edit

[edit]

Hi Diti. I thought I should draw your attention to a reversion I have made to one of your edits. See Commons talk:Project scope/Pages, galleries and categories for my reasons. Regards, --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:44, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All right, I replied. It's a(n important) thing I didn't think about, so I'm ok with this revert. :) →Diti the penguin — 12:21, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I can see the whole area of what is allowed on userpages is going to need more discussion soon. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 14:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source de File:Bonne année 2009-flop.jpg ?

[edit]

Salut, tu as marqué cette image comme étant un travail personnel. Pourrais-tu me confirmer que tu es également l'auteur de la photo originale ? Sinon, l'image doit être supprimée. Merci. →Diti the penguin — 17:07, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

bonjour Diti
Je suis bien l'auteur de la photo originelle mais je n'ai pas produit la tomate.--Pilpoil (talk) 16:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
La tomate de cette photo, étant ordinaire (par comparaison à celles produites par des personnes qui font de l'art avec), n'est de toutes façons pas éligible au copyright (personne n'a le droit de s'approprier un don de la nature ;). Le statut de l'image est donc uniquement basé sur les procédés que tu as utilisé pour la créer, or comme tu es à la fois l'auteur de la photo et l'auteur de la retouche, l'image ne sera pas supprimée ; ou plutôt (je te le dis à des fins informatives) : l'image sera éligible à la suppression si elle cesse d'être utilisée (voir Commons:Critères d'inclusion#Fichiers qui ne peuvent être utilisés légitimement). Merci pour ta réponse ! →Diti the penguin — 19:01, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to change allowable scope of userpage content

[edit]

I have made a proposal to specify more clearly what is and what is not allowed on userpages. You have expressed interest in this issue, and you may wish to comment at Commons talk:Project scope/Pages, galleries and categories#The use of userpages to advance personal political opinions. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Too late, I already replied before you sent the message. ;) There’s no need to restrict more than that to my eyes, by the way. We’ll see as and when problems come up. →Diti the penguin — 22:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Şebnem Ferah.jpg

[edit]

Can you delete this picture because of copyright. It hasn't got a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 license.--Hedda Gabler (talk) 10:59, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your awareness. The OTRS permission #2007032510015777 only targets the two following files at Commons: File:NaomiCampbell.jpg, and File:AlekWek.jpg. It seems that Turkish Flame (talk · contribs) picked up a random OTRS permission somewhere and used it for Image:Şebnem Ferah.jpg, which is quite grave. I deleted the image, don't hesitate to leave me another message for cases like this. →Diti the penguin — 11:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Can you look this photo too? Thanks.--Hedda Gabler (talk) 12:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Deleted as well. I finally acknowledged the way the transfers did happen, and found out that the OTRS permission actually targets two more files (out of 4), File:Tyson Beckford.jpg and File:Gemma Ward.jpg, under a CC-by-sa (no version given) license. Thus, the OTRS permission given is invalid for that file. Thank you again! →Diti the penguin — 14:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What about this, this, this.
And
I deleted them too, and left a message to the uploader. That way, hopefully he won't upload copyrighted content again. →Diti the penguin — 17:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Have a nice day (:--Hedda Gabler (talk) 12:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Diti/Archive/2009/January&oldid=18486440"