User talk:Dick smith fair go
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:07, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Fediverse Icon (2021 -BeAStar variant).svg[edit]
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fediverse Icon (2021 -BeAStar variant).svg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Fediverse Icon (2021 -BeAStar variant).svg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Achim (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Fediverse Icon (2021 BeAStar variant) colour.png[edit]
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fediverse Icon (2021 BeAStar variant) colour.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Fediverse Icon (2021 BeAStar variant) colour.png]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Achim (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Fediverse Icon (2021 -BeAStar variant) website treatments.png[edit]
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fediverse Icon (2021 -BeAStar variant) website treatments.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Fediverse Icon (2021 -BeAStar variant) website treatments.png]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Achim (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose You have made too few edits for giving IP block exemption. Taivo (talk) 20:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Taivo or whomever is able to unblock us, we appreciate the ongoing dialog. It appears more of an online reputation is needed. It may be helpful to know that we have a reputation on the Fediverse. You can cross-check this yourself, because we wrote about our interest in being unblocked today here, activism.openworlds.info/@dsfgs/105728727586217408 . We have been using that service over Tor network for a long time, well over a year now, and not had any noteworthy issues. Also today, we just fended off our first false claim that someone made against one of our images, labeling it a Derivative Work without any prove of such, we know that no proof would exist because we produced it. Anyway, thanks for your continued dialog and we really do hope that with this new knowledge about us, that we might be unblocked at the earliest convenience. Kind regards, DS Fair Go Supporters Dick smith fair go (talk) 12:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Username blocked[edit]
Your account has been blocked because the username does not meet our username policy.
If you are an organization or well known person, you are encouraged to verify your account; instructions can be found in the username policy. For other cases, you are encouraged to contribute to Commons under a more appropriate username. You can do this in several ways:
To other users visiting this page: if you feel that a username has been blocked in error, please discuss it here on this user's talk page.
|
Эlcobbola talk 17:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Эlcobbola, we are disappointed that you have rather brazenly blocked our entire account(?) immediately over some confusion about our name. It's not our complete name and so have requested a name change to 'DSFGS', if that helps. We **are** a supporters group for a Fair Go, after all. Dick smith fair go (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Эlcobbola, your promptness is appreciated, though the conclusions reached seem less considered. The COM:IU page has been read, but doesn't relate to the prospective new name, ie. DSFGS. As done on the fediverse profile, it is also trivial to say "We are not Dick Smith but supporters of his Fair Go movement" wherever it is needed (but it won't be needed if the name change affects everything). Points made in the unblock requests (unfortunately repeatedly) have **not** been addressed in the Denys. With all sincerity, over the past two days, good faith interactions were assumed, but getting more difficult to assume with the heavy stances and actions that have been taken and lack of consideration. The takeaway that a reasonable person might get from reading the above is that admins seem hostile. Given that this account has focused on Fediverse work the only conclusion is that this hostility is targeted at Fediverse development. Do Wikimedia administrators want to be seen as hindering creative works for Fediverse, the only real social media network that is an actual network and not a silo'ed walled garden? Where might one learn more about Wikimedia's corporate sponsors, if any? If the Deny and Block is not overturned, then other means of distributing the creative works will be used. Also this will not be forgotten in a hurry. Dick smith fair go (talk) 21:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- If COM:IU was read, what parts of "Promotional usernames that are used to promote a group or company [are inappropriate for editing on Wikimedia Commons]" and "Use of the names of organizations is allowed on Commons only if you verify your account, proving that you are or represent the respective organization" were unclear? Notwithstanding that the account has not been renamed, renaming "Dick smith fair go" to "DSFGS" (Dick Smith Fair Go Supporters) is equally problematic (indeed, activism.openworlds.info/@dsfgs is explicitly referenced in the blocking rationale) which, similarly, would have been readily understood if my comments had been critically read. We are not here for your soapboxing and self-promotion, nor are we were to entertain bad faith delusions ("the only conclusion is that this hostility is targeted at Fediverse development") and continuing in this manner may result in the removal of talk page access. If you find our polices disagreeable, finding "other means of distributing the creative works" would be a good option for you. Эlcobbola talk 21:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, the keyword missing was "Supporters", and efforts were immediately made to resolve that when highlighted. That name, DSFGS has been adopted since 2017. Even Dick's representative themselves in 2017 were happy for such a name to be used. So the guidelines are actually adhered to, we'd provide a screen grab of the remarks of Dick's rep but Failbook(sic) is not a platform we use anymore. This is not some grand promotional thing for us. We are merely helping Fedi at this moment because we feel it is where the 'Fair Go' exists. Having said that we no longer expect this to be remedied here. It is regrettable that wikimedia admins have made this decision, but alas it has been an enlightening learning experience. Dick smith fair go (talk) 23:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |