User talk:Designermadsen

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


I'm trying to work out your intent at Category:Kitesurfing in the United States, Category:Kitesurfing at Alki Beach, and Category:Kitesurfing at Golden Gardens Park (probably there are others, but these three were on my watchlist). There is no point to adding {{Wikidata Infobox}}—in fact it is something of a liability—if there is no Wikidata item connected to the category in question. Is this something you plan to add on Wikidata? Or should these templates be removed from the respective categories? - Jmabel ! talk 15:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

where planning on adding it to wikidata, is it a problem ?
15:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)~ Greetings Kent Madsen. (talk) 15:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
sry for not answering, earlier. were having a break. :) Greetings Kent Madsen. (talk) 16:13, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! - Jmabel ! talk 17:36, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you kindly not add {{Wikidata Infobox}} to galleries that have packed thumbnails? (e.g., <gallery mode="packed">). Adding the infobox causes packed thumbnails to malfunction: the <gallery> tag assumes that it can place images across the entire row.

In general, {{Wikidata Infobox}} is designed for categories, not galleries. You can see this from the documentation. Categories have a known layout, while galleries have much more variability. Please use care when adding infoboxes to galleries in order not to disrupt the layout.

Thanks very much! — hike395 (talk) 20:50, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok :) Greetings Kent Madsen. (talk) 04:55, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Region in Esbjerg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mike Peel (talk) 21:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Building in Esbjerg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mike Peel (talk) 21:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Street in Esbjerg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mike Peel (talk) 22:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rafaella escolhidas em jpg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nv8200p (talk) 23:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Building in Ribe has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mike Peel (talk) 19:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bad Hair Day mural.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 17:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:2021_April_photographs_by_Designermadsen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Wolverène (talk) 11:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

2021 January photographs by Designermadsen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


191.126.191.229 02:06, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SittingSamuraiByDesignermadsen-dfacdc3.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ApartmentsByDesignermadsen-dfbqtd5.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category description templates[edit]

Hi! I noticed that you added {{Category description|Taxon by administrative division}} to a lot of categories, especially about supermarkets, hardware stores, and snow(ing). I am happy that you like the category description template family, and I agree that it looks good and is helpful for these categories. However, the "Taxon by..." subtemplate is intended exclusively for biological taxons for plants and animals. I now created a new subtemplate {{Category description|Shops by administrative division}} which logically fits perfectly for supermarkets, hardware stores, and other kinds of shops. Currently both subtemplates look exactly the same, but I think it is important to keep things clean and logically assigned, because maybe at some later time we add more text or other features to one of the subtemplates, and then it will not fit any more for the categories outside its actual scope. I am currently switching all the supermarkets and hardware stores categories to the new template and hope you're fine with that.

I also saw that you later created new subtemplates yourself: for Precipitation, for Mural(s), for Sky and so on. That's very nice, and I hope it was reasonably easy for you to understand how to create such new subtemplates. However, I noticed that you use the :noredlinks modifier for all of them, so I thought I explain to you my reasons to display red links by default and maybe you want to reconsider that decision:

  • Red links show to the user that a specific region, district etc. wasn't just forgotten in the list but there is no category for it.
  • Red links make it easier to newly create missing categories with the correct name.
  • Red links maybe motivate people to create and fill the missing categories.

In any case, I'm very excited that you use the template for so many categories, and I will happily listen to any kind of feedback you have or answer any question that might arise.

Thanks -- Reinhard Müller (talk) 17:06, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ASUS ROG Strix G15 (Cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

D-Kuru (talk) 19:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]