User talk:Dan Koehl/2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Commons:Requests for rights[edit]

Look at your edits. Are you kidding me?--Kai3952 (talk) 17:41, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This causes me trouble! I hope you stop by!--Kai3952 (talk) 19:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm hoping you withdraw your request. To be honest, I'm very dissatisfied with you replace me to apply for Autopatrol. Did you intend to ignore me?--Kai3952 (talk) 09:27, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Im not sure what you mean, but I believe its possible that you have misunderstood the entire idea with Autopatrol. Dan Koehl (talk) 09:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Do you want me to leave Wikimedia Commons? If you do respect me, please you withdraw your RFR for Kai3952.--Kai3952 (talk) 10:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not at all, contrary, and I believe its possible that you have misunderstood the entire idea with Autopatrol, its not a nomination, its a tool to make things easier for patrollers. In any case, this issue is now for admins to decide. Dan Koehl (talk) 10:43, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You are too selfish! I have already said, I do NOT want to have the permission of autopatrol to edit Wikimedia Commons. I solemnly tell you that I have no misunderstanding with the policy of Patrol.--Kai3952 (talk) 11:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have infringed my freedom! I will report to the administrator.--Kai3952 (talk) 12:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Kai3952: , I can only repeat my previous message, that you must have misunderstood the idea with Autopatrol, its only a tool to make things easier for patrollers like me, so we dont have to patrol correct edits, like yours. Although any user themselves can request to become Autopatrolled, admins rather often just flag a user, after a patroller has requested it, or after the admins own patrolling, when the edits looks good, and theres no reason to patrol the edits. I have not insisted that you should accept to become Autopatrolled, tried to "force" you to do anything, infringe your freedom or anything like that, I have just followed a rather normal routine, by suggesting you become autopatrolled, thats all. Wether you are autopatrolled or not, is not for me to say, or for you, its a decision of admins. If you, for any reason dont want to be autoptarolled, Im sure they listen to that, especially after you reported me as vandalizing, which gives an indication that you may not fully understand the Policy rules of Commons. In any case, after I made my suggestion, this case was closed for me, and the outcome is decided by Commons adins. Now I ask you kindly to calm down, and try to read the pages I linked to you, which should give a user with your high level of English, a good insight in all the details regarding autopatrol. Dan Koehl (talk) 14:28, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is why you don't know how to respect others! You submitted it for RFR did it without my consent, that is to say, you use my name to apply for Autopatrol and you didn't consult me. I see you repeatedly say taht I have misunderstood the idea with Autopatrol, but you ignore my wishes: " I do NOT want to have the permission of autopatrol to edit Wikimedia Commons." I think you must have misunderstood the idea with Autopatrol. Do you see in the policy of Patrol(or COM:Autopatrol) that the user must accept the permission of autopatrol?--Kai3952 (talk) 13:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Kai3952: , Im sorry about your reactions, but it is a normal routine to apply for another user to become Autopatrolled, in which cases I never saw anyone consult the user, or ask for a permssion, and nowhere did I read recommendation to do so. And I cant see in the policy of Patrol (or COM:Autopatrol) that the user must accept the permission of autopatrol. Its normally enough that the user show good edits, seemingly can be trusted and after patrolling and reviewing some of your edits, I thought you did just fine, and could be autopatrolled. When I asked that you would be autopatrolled, I had only goood intentions, assumed good faith , and wanted to reduce work for patrollers like me. I think you have over reacted regarding this issue, and my advice is to drop it, especially now after admins decleared that you will not become autopatrolled (this time). Regarding respect, several users have now explained for you about the routines I followed, and I find that when you bring this issue to my talk page again, after the issue is closed, and this matter is slowly becoming Harassment, why I politely ask you to stay mellow. I may regard further emotinal comments regarding this issue as abuse of my talk page. Dan Koehl (talk) 14:57, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You said that I have over-reacted? Looks like you still don't understand. As I said in that discussion(see: "I need an administrator to help me with to "veto" the RFR for Kai3952"), I do NOT want to possess the autopatrol user right. As for why, because you submitted it for RFR did it without my consent. If you have asked me at my talk page if I am to apply for Autopatrol, then it will not happen. But I don't see you doing that. That's what you did to make me over-reacted! Additionally, I don't care about a normal routine to apply for Autopatrol, I only care about my being forced by you. But I don't need to tell you why I don't want to possess the autopatrol user right. If you don't want to be harassed, then you should repent yourself, instead of accuse me of harassing you. Otherwise, I will treat your words as "intimidation". Pay attention to what you say!--Kai3952 (talk) 15:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bad sourcing[edit]

Can you please clean up your sourcing? I continuously have to clean up your uploads with bad sourcing from English Wikipedia. I already asked you about this once. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Should I have made a mistake, Im sorry, I will look into this. Dan Koehl (talk) 23:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marostica 1.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Marostica 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:20, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marostica 1.jpg[edit]

File:Marostica 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:41, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_Koehl/2018&oldid=336347360"