User talk:Cvmontuy/Archive/2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melopsittacus undulatus mex180102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - I don't mind the cropped tail. Cute picture. If they're a couple and you can tell which one is male and which is female, please say so in the description. -- Ikan Kekek 04:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
They are both males, because of the blue noses. (Females have brown noses.) -- Johann Jaritz 05:25, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment - That would be good to mention, too. -- Ikan Kekek 09:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thanks for your review and the descriptions were edited, regards --Cvmontuy 16:10, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CerroDeLaSilla201806p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
How about File:CerroDeLaSilla201806p1 - test.jpg ? -- Eatcha 19:46, 31 March 2019 (UTC)  Comment your right I have uploaded a new version with more contrast thanks --Cvmontuy 22:09, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good Quality -- Eatcha 03:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balearica regulorum at tuzoofari.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:10, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panthera tigris at tuzoofari mexico2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:52, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pan troglodytes20180902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Nice --Podzemnik 01:06, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balearica regulorum,20180902 p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melopsittacus undulatus mex180102p6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aldnonymous 15:07, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balearica regulorum,20180902 p4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:17, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Aldnonymous 02:59, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Python bivittatus 1701.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Eatcha 15:07, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciudad del carmen20180803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Eatcha 15:07, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tiger tuzoofari2018p4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Could you check your WB? It looks quite blue --Podzemnik 02:58, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What about this version? --Cvmontuy 03:05, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 13:56, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tiger tuzoofari2018p3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Sight CAs around the left ear, otherwise an obvious QI. --Acabashi 22:59, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Do you mean the yellow spot on its left ear? --Cvmontuy 00:57, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, I think that is a fly's wing. Its the purple fringing around the edges of the ear. --Acabashi 10:07, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Please review the latest version thanks in advance --Cvmontuy 19:11, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 20:33, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iguana portrait acapulco 201905 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 17:24, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iguana mex aca 201905 p6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Chenspec 11:38, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acapulco, Punta Diamante 2019-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality image. --Acabashi 20:33, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iguana mex aca 201905 p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Iguana portrait acapulco 201905 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iguana portrait acapulco 201905 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZipLine Acapulco XtaSeap1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:22, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elephant bronze sculpture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very nice. It'd be nice to add size of the sculpture into the description --Podzemnik 04:03, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Done thanks for your review --Cvmontuy 18:18, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LaIslaCancun201905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:43, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oreaster reticulatus201905mx.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:43, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oreaster reticulatus (Red cushion seastar) under side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El cofrade 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bronze elephant p3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vulphere 03:40, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PolarizedFilterKenkop2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LagunaCancun1906.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A lot of noise ... Sharpness could be improved too. --XRay 04:49, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Would you review this version, thanks --Cvmontuy 15:14, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Very weak  Support. The quality should be better. At the two buildings at the left are Moire structures, sharpness could be better. But it's acceptable. --XRay 17:55, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Litchi chinensis190714mx.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality and good use of stacking technique. --GRDN711 02:53, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nephelium lappaceum201907mx.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --GRDN711 02:53, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TorreDePemex1907p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TorreDePemex1907p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 03:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TorreDePemex1907p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 03:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de las 3 cultruas p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:38, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centro Cultural Universitario Tlatelolco 2019p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta de la iglesia de Santiago Tlatelolco 201907.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nuestra señora del Carmen in SLP2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Impressive resolution --Podzemnik 02:13, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Facade of temple Holay Trinity in Tepoztlan2019p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Microcentrum retinerve Mex2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good. Charlesjsharp 16:03, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facade of temple La Santísima Trinidad en Tepoztlán.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadium Lights 2019mex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:41, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Culiacan bridge2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Culiacan bridge2019p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 11:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomateros Ball2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you remove CA? It¨s visible even at a thumb --Podzemnik 05:32, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment i have reduced the ca, would you please check it again --Cvmontuy 15:33, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good good, thank you! --Podzemnik 04:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passage Hotel Jarandas2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZipLine Acapulco XtaSeap0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:58, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferrari 480, Mexico 2019p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:53, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferrari 480, Mexico 2019p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FuenteDeLasCibelesMxLetrasP1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to the main object, but the people in the background are disurbing the composition a bit --Michielverbeek 07:57, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FuenteDeLasCibelesp4v2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 20:31, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FuenteDeLasCibelesP2v2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SanMiguel wooddoor2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carschten 16:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NightView ParishSanMiguel2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Chenspec 22:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:39, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euphorbia pulcherrima Yellow and red Mexico2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 23:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mesones Street SnMiguelAllende2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:45, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RoofDecorationsSnMiguel2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:08, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RoofDecorationsSnMiguel2019p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ParroquiaSanMiguel2019P2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but geo-location is missing --Michielverbeek 08:34, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 CommentDone --Cvmontuy 12:38, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good now --PantheraLeo1359531 20:33, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerial and night view of Parish of San Miguel, San Miguel de Allende.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canoa Marina Veracruz2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañonero Guanajuato2019p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]