User talk:Cvmontuy/Archive/2017

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre Mayor y Torre Reforma1612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is OK, but please, consider COM:OVERCAT next time --A.Savin 22:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zophobas morio head1612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zophobas mario head2 1612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zophobas mario head3 1612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atlixco torre Santa Maria de La Natividad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:55, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atlixco patio 1701.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:56, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre bancomer 1612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Munart stairs170108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:16, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AF-S DX Nikkor 18-140 f 3.5-5.6G ED VR LENS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AF-S DX Nikkor 18-140 f 3.5-5.6G ED VR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
AF Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:10, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:23, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reginas Tourtle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support This is one is tricky. First I thought it was painted digitally but it's a photo. So, if I can't identify it as a photo, I think it must be good this way. OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:25, 12 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, there's just one thing: the category should be more concrete, I've seen that there is one called Drawings for turtles for example. --Basotxerri 16:35, 12 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment Thanks, category has been fixed. --Cvmontuy 16:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AF-D Nikkor 50mm f 1.4 front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cool, aperture blades :) Good quality. --A.Savin 17:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasillo aeropuerto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:33, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre Acuario 170120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reforma 3 skycrappers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reforma skycrappers1701.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:38, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre Manacar 170203v2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre Manacar 170203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tunnel mixcoac insurgentes1702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Valuable documentation and good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AF-D Nikkor 50mm F 1.4D pic1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:10, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eschrichtius robustus with calf ALM 1702 p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eschrichtius robustus ALM 1702 p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 01:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eschrichtius robustus ALM 1702 p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La paz malecon 1702p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pachycereus pringlei 1702p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embraer 170 Aeromexico 20170217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments plant was removed using gimp clonning tool I hope this is aceptable --Cvmontuy 16:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC) That was a lot of work! :) But it looks good now. Thanks! QI.W.carter 20:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC) thanks, but a lot of fun also --Cvmontuy 06:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapultepec sculpture verdedf p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acueducto de chapultepec p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus on the aqueduct. -- Ikan Kekek 05:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acueducto de chapultepec p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please have a look to the image. It needs perspective corretion. --XRay 07:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC) Are you sure, the construction is very irregular?  Comment Please sign your comments. And: Yes. Please have a look to the background. It look like the image is leaning out. --XRay 06:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)  Comment There are two post that are actualy tilted, but review the semaphore behind and the buildings are ok --Cvmontuy 01:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC) Weak  Support You're right. I think you know that's not the best composition. So it's only weak support. --XRay 16:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Paz malecon 1702 p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 11:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utility post La Paz1702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting. OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:42, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapultepec sculpture verdedf p3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. F16 was a bit of overkill, methinks, but the softness isn't a deal breaker for me. --Crisco 1492 02:04, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airport hall 75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great quality + great preservation of lighting that usually is lost in most photographs of brightly-lit places. --PhilipTerryGraham 21:34, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

¡Muchas gracias, Cvmontuy!

Ya corregí los datos de geolocalización de tres imágenes que subí a Commons. ¡Muchísimas gracias, abrazo desde la Ciudad de México! --Correogsk or Gustavo (Editrocito or Heme aquí) 19:34, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airport hall 75p4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Depressing light but good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 05:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airport hall 75p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some significant blue chromatic aberration on the chairs down right. Could you please get rid of that? --W.carter 09:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment thanks ca removed --Cvmontuy 01:33, 2 April 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --W.carter 06:24, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angel de la independencia170409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy, but quality is high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:08, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Cvmontuy/Archive,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongoose bicycle in Mexico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:15, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reforma buildings1704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs some kind of perspective correction, the building on the left are leaning in. --Basotxerri 19:58, 1 May 2017 (UTC), done --Cvmontuy 03:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC) OK, thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:52, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TreeCuatla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Aperture of f/16 may be too much. f/11 should be enough and the image becomes sharper. --XRay 04:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edificio Reforma 164.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Please link the scope (or part of it) to a Commons category. You can have a look at other nominations in edit mode to see how it's done. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:19, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spheres3cu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 05:37, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spherical garden lamp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 05:37, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Missing43 5834.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good view of the subject, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 03:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Spherical garden lamp.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spherical garden lamp.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Distillation towers Tulap2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Distillation Towers Tulap1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:12, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Distillation towers Tulap3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utility pole and tree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, IMO, and certainly an interesting motif. -- Ikan Kekek 07:25, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EOS RebelG open.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:16, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EOS RebelGp2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:42, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EOS RebelG Openp2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Flor sin identificar

Hola Carlos,

los compañeros del proyecto de identificación de plantas de la Wikipedia francesa son tremendamente eficaces, mira aquí:

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projet:Botanique/Quelle_est_cette_plante_%3F#Fleur_de_Mexique_.C3.A0_d.C3.A9terminer

¡Qué tengas un buen día!

Saludos,

--Basotxerri (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reforma buildings1706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Rename

Hello, I declined your rename request for File:Stabilo aquacolor2017.jpg : zoom on the picture, it's written "aquacolor". Can you argument your request ? Thanks --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 16:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stabilo aquacolor2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stabilo color pencils.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Anyway, I like it. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estadio Azteca1706p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estadio Azteca1706p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted, could you fix it, please? --Basotxerri,  Comment what about this version? 20:03, --Cvmontuy 19:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC) OK for me. --Basotxerri 17:02, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estadio Azteca1706 Intp1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good. --Rbrechko 12:01, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Estadio Azteca.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Good, but we must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
  The geocode tag is already on the picture or are refering to something else? --Cvmontuy (talk) 19:13, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Cathedral in VI

For the cathedral in VI can you add Facade to the scope. As there was no vote of the has nothing else to do. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:51, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MoreliaCatedralTower170622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MoreliaFountainp1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:36, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MoreliaCathedral170627p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:31, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma vagans p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 03:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachypelma vagans p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Both of these are quite good, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 03:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catedral de Morelia, northern facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment In my view, this image illustrates the cathedral better. Martinvl (talk) 07:05, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I would support if the scope was changed to include something like northern facade. --El Grafo (talk) 07:28, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I proposed a modification of scope to the nominator but we have no answer, for now. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Catedral de Morelia to Catedral de Morelia, northern facade --El Grafo (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

• @Cvmontuy, Martinvl, and Archaeodontosaurus: since it appears highly unlikely for this nomination to succeed with the broad scope, I went ahead and changed it. As I've now been involved in the nomination process, I'll abstain from voting, however. Hope that's OK for everyone? --El Grafo (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me; Good initiative. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment OK by me. Martinvl (talk) 16:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

 Comment many thanks --Cvmontuy (talk) 16:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Spanish translation

Hi. I was wondering if you could add a Spanish translation to the description for this photo: File:Passion Vine NBG LR.jpg. Thank you. PumpkinSky talk 01:42, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FordFiestap1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 16:32, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brachypelma vagans (Mexican red rump tarantula), adult female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Spiders often show en:Sexual dimorphism, and it seems that Brachypelma vagans is no exception to that. Do you know whether this is a male or a female? (Español: es:Dimorfismo sexual → ¿Masculino o femenino?). --El Grafo (talk) 15:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)  Comment This is the same specimen as in is an adult female tarantula, --Cvmontuy (talk) 18:18, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Useful. Look at scope changes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:07, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Brachypelma vagans p1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brachypelma vagans p1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AngelSeguridadSocialp1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morelia Corredorp1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:01, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AngelSeguridadSocialP2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:35, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AngelSeguridadSocialP2 nobg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Torre Reforma.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support The angle makes this the best in scope IMO.--Peulle (talk) 13:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:31, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flash Nikon SB700 back.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OldShoe201707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me, however I think I would apply a bit more contrast. --Basotxerri 20:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC)  Comment thanks is better know? --Cvmontuy 03:00, 27 July 2017 (UTC) Better now, thank you! --Basotxerri 15:44, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaguar Knight Head.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:29, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SpeedLight SB700p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a bit of chromatic noise on the upper part of the black, could you clean that up please? --W.carter 08:57, 28 July 2017 (UTC)  Comment What about this version? --Cvmontuy 12:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC) Good enough for QI. --W.carter 09:23, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikon Speedligth SB-700, 3/4 view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It is necessary to add to the scope 3/4 face and the image of the back is also accesible to a label VI --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
   Comment done, thanks --Cvmontuy (talk) 12:14, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikon Speedligth SB-700, rear view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful image, not many of these on Commons.--Peulle (talk) 16:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikon SpeedLight SB700 rear view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikon SpeedLight SB-700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reforma164 201708p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:24, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TECicloCombinadoValleHermoso2017p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your image. There is a stitching error (see note) and please check WB - IMO too blue. --XRay 04:57, 13 August 2017 (UTC)  Comment I have fixed both issues thanks for reviewing --Cvmontuy 02:40, 14 August 2017 (UTC)  Support Thank you. Much better. It's support of your image in advance. Please have a look to the white edge top right. --XRay 07:29, 15 August 2017 (UTC) thanks it has been fixed, --Cvmontuy 11:45, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cocodrilo LeonoraCarrington.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:12, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crocodile by Leonora Carrington.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question Is the name spelled correctly?--Peulle (talk) 18:46, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

 Comment I just have fixed the name, thanks --Cvmontuy (talk) 08:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Looks like the best angle.--Peulle (talk) 06:54, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TECicloCombinadoValleHermosoP3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough, verticals well done, bottom crop small but acceptable, so quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 17:00, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ElDanzanteJuanVelascoPardomop1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:40, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ToysQueretaro201708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 03:47, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EsculturaAztecaP2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. BTW: I like EXIF data. --XRay 05:44, 27 August 2017 (UTC)  Comment I just added the data --Cvmontuy 16:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MonumenotALaRevolución201708p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK now. --C messier 08:55, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Queretaro Centro Sur201708p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:28, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of dancing Chichimeca in Santiago de Querétaro.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blossom and Laysha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 11:39, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Offering to the Holy Cross.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:10, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acueducto 20170917p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acueducto 20170917p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 22:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Templo de la Santa Cruz, Querétaro.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acueducto 20170917p3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO colors too cold. Geo location missing and the aqueduct is only a small part. So title and description should be better. --XRay 18:55, 13 September 2017 (UTC)  Comment What about this version --Cvmontuy 02:55, 14 September 2017 (UTC)  Support Better and good enough. Thank you. --XRay 05:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EmilianoZapataTab1709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some minor CA, but overall QI to me --Poco a poco 18:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Proa California Star.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 04:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Popa California Starp1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 03:57, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volaris Airbus320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:30, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua JuanAntonioDeUrrutia En Queretaro2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok by me -- Sixflashphoto 01:29, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LaPazTitle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LaPazPerla201709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please improve the categorization. --XRay 13:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)  Comment Done, thanks --Cvmontuy 02:49, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DerrumbeMexico1709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CiudadDelCarmenSeawall2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Artistic photo, well done, good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 22:52, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Usumancinta Balancan2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:19, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fly mty 20130222-3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:56, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CumulonimbusMexicoP1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High-quality and a very good photo. -- Ikan Kekek 00:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cat side2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice portrait, cute cat. -- Ikan Kekek 02:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cat front2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, but is that a dust spot near the upper left corner? It's some kind of spot. -- Ikan Kekek 03:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)  Comment It was a dust spot, but removed now, thanks --Cvmontuy 06:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC) Thanks.  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alebrije20171109p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 02:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alebrije20171109p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:17, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reforma skullsp2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reforma skullsp1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandon building insurgentes niza mexico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, conceivably an FP. -- Ikan Kekek 09:39, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Picture request

Hi Carlos. I saw you are in Mexico City. May I state a picture request in Mexico City for you? --Thomas Ledl (talk) 13:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Thomas, It will be fun for me, I will do my best to assit you, but please be pattient, I have limitations on time and technical skills, What is your request? --Cvmontuy (talk) 13:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Carlos. Great!

Not sure if you saw my reply let's talk on your user page.

My request is for en:Old Portal de Mercaderes (Mexico City). It is the Grand Hotel now. Especially the hall and the elevator where we only have blurred images in Wikipedia so far. I believe it might be hard to shoot. Have you done interior shooting with dynamic range issues before? I have some experience maybe I can guide you and/or do the post processing (I'm quite sure some stitching will be required as well).

The hall was in the James Bond Spectre opening scene. This is definitely a "featured image-target". I'm a big Art Nouveau fan and I'm angry I missed it in Wikimania 2015. --Thomas Ledl (talk) 10:36, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reforma skullsp3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reforma Skullsp4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:36, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ChristmasDecorations201711.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:30, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nochebuenas201711.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:30, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parroquia de Nuestra Señora de la Piedad2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentThe right side is leaning in, please fix. Optionally, you could tone up the midtone contrast/clarity for dehazing a bit. --Basotxerri 19:57, 26 November 2017 (UTC) CommentThanks for your review, I have uploaded a new version --Cvmontuy 04:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC) Maybe the left side is leaning out a bit now (these combined tilt and perspective corrections are sometimes difficult) but it's OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GranHotelCiudadDeMexico201712p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:26, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GranHotelCiudadDeMexico201712p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Quite a lot of uninteresting floor in the foreground. Maybe you can crop that out. --Ermell 08:40, 5 December 2017 (UTC)  Comment Thanks, i have uploaded a croped version --Cvmontuy 20:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GranHotelCiudadDeMexico201712p3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, beautiful architecture. --Marrovi 05:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)