User talk:Chainwit.

Archives /Archive 1

File:Wanchalerm Save วันเฉลิม.jpg

File:Wanchalerm Save วันเฉลิม.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buddhist Stupa, Pura Ulun Danu Bratan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:57, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batuan - Pura Puseh Batuan 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok for this one. --Sebring12Hrs 08:48, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pura batuan gianyar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:51, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Ku วัดกู้ -- Reclining Buddha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:51, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiang Rai Wat Phra Singha วัดพระสิงห์ เชียงราย - ubosot อุโบสถ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiang Rai Wat Phra Singha วัดพระสิงห์ เชียงราย - อุโบสถ ubosot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 17:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panch Batti Circle Jaipur पांच बत्ती सर्किल (2022-07) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:12, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bhangarh Fort - Royal Palace Bhangarh (July 2022) - img 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 19:19, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ubud Palace (2022).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. For your information, "istana" means "palace." -- Ikan Kekek 06:48, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nara 2020 at Chūmon, Todaiji.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyoto 2020 at Kinkaku-ji.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (A little bit noisy, but the img composition is great) --Terragio67 18:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Japan 2020 Golden Hall, Toji.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! วัดมิ่งเมือง เชียงราย Chiang Rai Wat Ming Mueang (2022) - image 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! วัดมิ่งเมือง เชียงราย Chiang Rai Wat Ming Mueang (2022) - image 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! วัดมิ่งเมือง เชียงราย Chiang Rai Wat Ming Mueang (2022) - image 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! วัดมิ่งเมือง เชียงราย Chiang Rai Wat Ming Mueang (2022) - image 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sammandi 05:42, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! วัดมิ่งเมือง เชียงราย Chiang Rai Wat Ming Mueang (2022) - image 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 20:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Japan 2020 South Octagonal Hall, Kofuku-ji.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! วัดแสงแก้วโพธิญาณ Wat Saeng Kaew Phothiyan main building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! อาคารชัยพัฒนสิน สะพานพิทยเสถียร 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Islamic Arts Museum Malaysia Exterior (May 2022) - img 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beautiful panels of Hanuman Dhoka 2023 January (im 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! มศว องครักษ์ ภาพถ่าย 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lalitpur Durbar Square Bell 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:48, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lalitpur Durbar Square Temple 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:47, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door panel showing Astamangala in a Lalitpur street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs at least one category about the subject (gates?) --Poco a poco 19:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC) Yep --Chainwit. 02:44, 2 February 2023 (UTC) In this case, please, add those categories to the description page accordingly --Poco a poco 20:03, 2 February 2023 (UTC)  Done Thank you! --Chainwit. 15:20, 3 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beautiful panels of Hanuman Dhoka 2023 January (im 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 18:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A building on a street towards Kathmandu Durbar Sq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiang Rai Wat Phra Singha วัดพระสิงห์ เชียงราย - vihara kaew.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 07:11, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Asiatic Company Building Bangkok adjusted.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 15:18, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A gate in Jaipur city palace looking out to the Mubaraq Mahal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:39, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Ku วัดกู้ -- เจดีย์.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doha Qatar - Souq Waqif.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 20:04, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doha Qatar - Katara Dovecotes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 23:44, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Bucharest - 152 Calae Victoriei.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucharest - 152 Calae Victoriei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doha Qatar - Masjid Katara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Modern primat 23:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucharest - Union Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gara Centrală din Oradea (April 2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taras H Shevchenko Memorial, Sighetu Marmatiei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Timișoara - Palatul Episcopiei Ortodoxe Sârbe (April 2023) - image 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 13:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Timișoara - Palatul Episcopiei Ortodoxe Sârbe (April 2023) - image 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 13:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arad Railway Station stairs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 19:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Timișoara - Banca de Scont aka Palatul Miksa Steiner (April 2023) - image 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maramureș Village Museum & Maramureș Tradition (April 2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Constantine and Helena Monastery Budești Mănăstirea Sfinții Împărați Constantin și Elena Budești.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucharest - Dr Nicolae Minovici Villa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! "Timisoara has the first electric street lighting in Europe" monument lamp --- file 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Art Deco building in Bucharest near the peasant museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:10, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palatul Banca Națională a României, Timișoara (2023) - IMG 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. For mobile phone --Florstein 12:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arad Train Station (floor 1 interior).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palatul Banca Națională a României, Timișoara (2023) - IMG 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gara Timișoara Nord (April 2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:53, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maramureș Village Museum, a House (April 2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinagoga Aachvas Rein (now Museum of Jewish History in Oradea) Oradea (2023) - img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mănăstirea Piariștilor, Sighetu Marmației (2023) - IMG 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biserica ucraineană „Înălțarea Sfintei Cruci”, Sighetu Marmației (2023) - IMG 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opera Națională Română din Timișoara (April - 2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's better now. Thanks. --Imehling 15:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Brück, Piața Unirii, Timișoara (2023) - IMG 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brașov - Palatul Friedrich Czell din Piața Sfatului (2023) - IMG 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:39, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sala Sporturilor „Constantin Jude” ( Sala Olimpia ) - 2023 - IMG 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 05:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Podul Traian, Timișoara (2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:42, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Timisoara, Timișoara (2023) - IMG 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

File:1 Captain Bush Lane บ้านเลขที่ 1 ซอยเจริญกรุง 30 (Jun 2021) - img 04.jpg

File:1 Captain Bush Lane บ้านเลขที่ 1 ซอยเจริญกรุง 30 (Jun 2021) - img 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paul_012 (talk) 15:46, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biserica de lemn „Cuvioasa Paraschiva” din Sat-Șugatag - (2023) - IMG 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:41, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Str Berthelot Nr 1-3 sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bârsana Monastery, Maramureș, Romania (2023) - IMG 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bârsana Monastery, Maramureș, Romania (2023) - IMG 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice church, good composition, good quality -- Spurzem 19:19, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biserica de lemn „Cuvioasa Paraschiva” din Sat-Șugatag - (2023) - IMG 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oradea - Astoria Grand Hotel (April 2023) - image 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Corinthia Khartoum 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Corinthia Khartoum 03.jpg
• File:Corinthia Khartoum 04.jpg
• File:Corinthia Khartoum 05.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 05:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Casa Memorială Stan Ioan Pătraș (2023) - bust 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Casa Memorială Stan Ioan Pătraș (2023) - bust 02.jpg
• File:Casa Memorială Stan Ioan Pătraș (2023) - bust 03.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elgin Bridge, Singapore (2023 June) - img 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 21:59, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Masjid Sultan, Singapore (2023 June) - img 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:16, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domul Romano-Catolic din Timișoara (2023) - IMG 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:15, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Masjid Sultan, Singapore (2023 June) - img 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:18, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palatul Episcopiei Greco-Catolice, Oradea (2023) - img 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Tagooty 02:44, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luna Rossa, an Art-Deco building in Bucharest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Armenian Church of Saint Gregory the Illuminator Սուրբ Գրիգոր Լուսավորիչ եկեղեցի (Սինգապուր) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:33, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hilton Singapore Orchard (2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A cat at Kumbeshwar Temple, Patan (January 2023) - IMG 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 17:32, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antim Monastery Bucharest (March 2023) - img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:59, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Masjid Sultan, Singapore (2023 June) - img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:39, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palatul Vulturul Negru, Oradea (2023) - img 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lalitpur Patan Durbar Square 2023 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:21, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pura Ulun Danu Tamblingan, Munduk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:21, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assumption Cathedral Bangkok 2023-10 อาสนวิหารอัสสัมชัญ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 20:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Demetrius Church Church of Oath Taking, Bucharest (2023) - img 00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ngee Ann City (2023-06-05) IMG 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 07:33, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023 Oct - Quedlinburg - Schloßberg Finkenherd - IMG 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023 Oct - Quedlinburg - Schloßberg Finkenherd - IMG 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 06:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023 Oct - Quedlinburg - Schloßberg Finkenherd - IMG 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 14:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023 Oct - Quedlinburg - Schloßberg Finkenherd - IMG 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023 Oct - Quedlinburg - Schloßberg Finkenherd - IMG 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022 July - JawaharKalaKendra Jaipur 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, interesting lighting -- Spurzem 22:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung (Berlin) 2023-10 -img 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:33, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Doha Qatar - Katara Towers Lusail.jpg

File:Doha Qatar - Katara Towers Lusail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Doha Qatar - Katara Towers Lusail cropped.jpg

File:Doha Qatar - Katara Towers Lusail cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Doha Qatar - Doha Museum of Islamic Art.jpg

File:Doha Qatar - Doha Museum of Islamic Art.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Parcul Catedralei Timișoara (2023) IMG1.jpg

File:Parcul Catedralei Timișoara (2023) IMG1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Parcul Catedralei Timișoara (2023) IMG2.jpg

File:Parcul Catedralei Timișoara (2023) IMG2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scenes from Swayambhunath (January 2023) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:11, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herbert-Baum-Denkmal, Museumsinsel, Berlin (2023-10) - Bild 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:27, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucharest - Gara de Nord (2023) - img 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 20:50, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023 Piata Mare din Sibiu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:10, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Biserica Ortodoxa Iosefin (MAR 2023) - img 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Biserica Ortodoxa Iosefin (MAR 2023) - img 02.jpg
• File:Biserica Ortodoxa Iosefin (MAR 2023) - img 03.jpg
• File:Biserica Ortodoxa Iosefin (MAR 2023) - img 04.jpg
• File:Biserica Ortodoxa Iosefin (MAR 2023) - img 05.jpg
• File:Biserica Ortodoxa Iosefin (MAR 2023) - img 08.jpg
• File:Biserica Ortodoxa Iosefin (MAR 2023) - img 09.jpg
• File:Biserica Ortodoxa Iosefin (MAR 2023) - img 11.jpg
• File:Biserica Ortodoxa Iosefin (MAR 2023) - img 13.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:47, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Palatul Administrativ Timișoara (2023).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Neuer Fritz (Friedrichstraße 105–106, Berlin-Mitte) 2023 -- 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023 Berliner Dom - Westfassade -- 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:47, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biserica Iezuiților din Sibiu - Jesuit Church of Sibiu (MAR 2023) exterior - IMG 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:40, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bucharest - 152 Calea Victoriei i.jpg

And also:

• File:Bucharest - 152 Calea Victoriei.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 54 - 58 Waterloo Street, Singapore (2023) - img 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scenes from Swayambhunath (January 2023) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Picture is ok. Please add at least a short description what this inscription is about. --Plozessor 06:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sri Aravan ஸ்ரீ அரவான் at Maha Mariamman Koyil Singapore (2023) - img 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bucharest Palace of the Holy Synod Library (2023) - img 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 22:14, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quedlinburg - around the Mathildenbrunnen (Oct 2023) - IMG 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs PC. Car at bottom right is distracting. --Tagooty 03:44, 15 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Don't like the car but don't see any issues with PC (the buildings are crooked). QI for me. --Plozessor 09:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Berlin U-Bahnstation - Museumsinsel (Oktober 2023) 02.jpg

And also:

• File:Berlin U-Bahnstation - Museumsinsel (Oktober 2023) 03.jpg
• File:Berlin U-Bahnstation - Museumsinsel (Oktober 2023) 04.jpg

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 10:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strada Mitropoliei, Sibiu (2023) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scenes from Swayambhunath (January 2023) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sibiu - Strada Mitropoliei (2023) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 12:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2024-Apr Jing-an Temple 静安寺 Shanghai 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bulevardul Aviatorilor 24-26 București (Ukrainian Embassy, Bucharest) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arad 2023 - Palatul Cultural din Arad - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 20:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2024-Apr Shanghai Yu Yuan Garden 豫园 - img 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2024-Apr Shanghai Yu Yuan Garden 豫园 - img 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prtiam Niwas Chawk ki Jaipur City Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not sharp enough --Stratokumulus 20:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2024-Apr Jing-an Temple 静安寺 Shanghai 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)