User talk:Cayambe/Archive8

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

ARCHIVE 8 = ARCHIVE 2017

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osweiler World War II memorial 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 22:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boufferdanger Muer 2016 accès.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boufferdanger Muer 2016a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --The Photographer 12:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boufferdanger Muer 2016 accès b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:12, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pto de la Cruz - Calle Verode - upper part.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:47, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pto de la Cruz - Calle Verode - Euphorbia candelabrum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:47, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Café littéraire Le Bovary Weimerskirch Luxembourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque Alphonse Steinès Weimerskirch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Café littéraire Le Bovary Weimerskirch Luxembourg frontal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC) I also think so --Michielverbeek 06:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euphorbia candelabrum Calle Verode Puerto de la Cruz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Globicephala macrorhynchus Tenerife 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz – Plaza de Europa towards San Telmo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you crop a bit of the left border to remove that palm tree leaves, please? --Basotxerri 15:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment The longitude was wrong, I have corrected it. It might be an idea to blur or pixelize some of the faces. -- Renardo la vulpo 16:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC). ✓ Done Thanks for correcting the geocode (E to W). New version uploaded: branches at the left side removed and faces blurred. The latter is a general issue, I'll post it to the discussion page. Thanks to both of you. --Cayambe 15:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)  Support QI for me now. -- Renardo la vulpo 21:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz – Plaza de Europa – Placa cañones.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz - Templo Nuestra Señora de la Peñita 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 18:04, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embarcadero de El Penitente - Puerto de la Cruz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 13:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz - Calle Mequinez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:27, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife - Coast from La Paz towards NE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Striking and very good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz - Calle de Quintana - Diciembre 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:13, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restaurante Casa Pepe Puerto de la Cruz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:07, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garachico SW - Tenerife.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz – Plaza de Europa Dec 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:31, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rafael Alberti – Garachico Tenerife – lateral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 01:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rafael Alberti – Garachico Tenerife – frontal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steschke 15:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz Tenerife - Dulce María Loynaz - Monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garachico - plaza Juan González de la Torre 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:46, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz - Parque Taoro - Promontorio Atalaya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:21, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz - Parque Taoro - Atalaya Restaurante.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz - A Christie monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz - Camino de las Cabras 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hesperange Alzette aval.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality overall, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 18:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hesperange Alzette bridge and church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hesperange 1944 tank accident memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:32, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hesperange Parc Plaque Parc communal Urbengsschlass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:46, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz - Hotel Riu Garoé left.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:34, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle Dr Celestino González Padrón, Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife - street sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments As the main subject is the street sign, the DoF is OK for me. However, could you add some street sign-related category? --Basotxerri 18:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Two categories added. --Cayambe 07:16, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:36, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hesperange Plaque Mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:30, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hesperange Plaque Centenaire Harmonie municipale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good use of DoF. Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heidsee Damm - CH Graubünden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 20:04, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garachico - Puerta de Tierra parque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 18:27, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City - Schéieschlach depuis Rempart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City rue Wiltheim - Schéieschlach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:18, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg-ville - chemin du rempart vers rue du palais de justice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City - fortress wall - pont Grande-duchesse-Charlotte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City - Kirchberg depuis Chemin du rempart - mars 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you check the perspective, please? The image seems slightly tilted CW. --Basotxerri 17:56, 14 May 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks for the review. Tilt removed. --Cayambe 19:41, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK now, thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg-ville - rue Wiltheim - rue du palais de justice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 15:52, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg City - Am Dierfchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 13:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bertrange - Résidence Dr-Sisy-Lentz arrière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment There is black frame, can you remove itplease? --A.Savin 19:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC). ✓ Done Oups... and thanks. Black border removed all around. --Cayambe 20:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 01:59, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bertrange Parc Lentz - Résidence Lentz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:26, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! E411 Belgique - Aire du Bois de Tellin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:55, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jan Anteunis – Nixe – De Haan – broad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Haan Beach West.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The picture is leaning to the left and could also be a bit sharper. Fixable? --Llez 14:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review. Straightened and sharpened. --Cayambe 15:08, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Better now --Llez 16:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Haan Koninklijke Baan - Stationsstraat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:50, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Haan Beach West b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:10, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Haan Kitesurfing 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 07:49, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Haan Beach centre b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:47, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Haan Beach centre c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Haan - Beach East b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:41, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Haan - Beach East a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Haan Street sign Streuvelslaan - Consciencelaan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Tilted CW little bit --Halavar 11:22, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Tilt crrected. Thanks for the review. --Cayambe 05:57, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 19:51, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Haan - Houses in Hendrik Consciencelaan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 07:36, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colmar-Berg - parc public.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morgue in Colmar-Berg 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:15, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schifflange - réserve naturelle, station de baguage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 10:48, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Monica – Third Street Promenade (a) 06 Sept 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:45, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Monica – Third Street Promenade (b) Sept 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Monica - Downtown - Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Monica – Third Street Promenade (c) Sept 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Monica – Beach (a) – pool.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:13, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liefrange – De klenge Buttik 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 17:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liefrange – Haaptstrooss - Kirewee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Monica – Lifeguard tower (wide) 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:29, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liefrange Marjashaff.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe something on the white side. But for me good quality.--Famberhorst 19:21, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Monica – Lifeguard tower (narrow) 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Monica – Third Street Promenade - Movie theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liefrange – Plaque Battle of the Bulge 1944.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)[edit]

* Happy Holidays 2018, Cayambe! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 25 December 2017 (UTC)   [reply]