User talk:Cayambe/Archive2

ARCHIVE 2 = ARCHIVE 2011

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iguana iguana Portoviejo 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Happy now. --Dschwen 16:00, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iguana iguana Portoviejo 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 11:48, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Pl d'Armes Pëtzdeckel-protected well.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes it is !!--Jebulon 13:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecuador Quito El Ejido Humboldt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments gut --Carschten 16:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water hyacinth Ec Portoviejo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 08:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecuador Manta Murciélago beach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 19:42, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito historical centre colonial house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Jebulon 23:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Quito calle García Moreno.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Quito calle García Moreno.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:05, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecuador Manta beach restaurants.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Perhaps good. To me, a bit noised. See the signboard with the words "Deli Jireh"--Lmbuga 20:32, 3 February 2011 (UTC)  Comment Mmh, I don't think the signboard is noisy (ISO 200). Please, see the dark interior of the restaurant: there's no noise there, at least for my feeling. Thanks for reviewing. --Cayambe 11:37, 4 February 2011 (UTC) Ok. Perhaps the image is improvable, but it's good--Lmbuga 19:56, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Pfaffenthal rue L Menager 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Carschten 10:29, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecuador El Carmen street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Jumbled-up composition, but that seems to just be a jumbled street. IdLoveOne 21:08, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Musée national d'histoire et d'art grille en fer forgé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame of the background but good.--Jebulon 00:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Pfaffenthal St Matthew on church façade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 20:00, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City courtyard Musée d'histoire de la ville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Knuedler excavation 03a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 07:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Luxembourg pictures

Hello Cayambe. I would just like to thank you for all the excellent photographs you have taken in Luxembourg. I keep discovering them as I try to expand the EN WP's coverage of the Grand Duchy and have included many of them in recent articles. Keep up the good work. - Ipigott (talk) 13:45, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Dear Cayambe,

I have seen your picture from the Schloss Karlsruhe ( http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Karlsruhe_Castle_July_09_c66.jpg )ann we want to use this image for our souveniers.

Please let me know how you want to place your name on the pictures. Please let me have your answer by mail: s.breithaupt@berlin-design.com

Thank you

Brgds

Berlin Design

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Petrusse fortress and remarkable beech 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good (Perhaps the image is tilted very slightly to the left?)--Ankara 10:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elaeis guineensis oil palm fruit Portoviejo Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good picture, very good DoF. --Jebulon 00:12, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlsruhe Castle July 09 c66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 13:10, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Bestioles équatoriennes en FPC

Que dire, sinon t'adresser mes compliments ?
Tes deux iguanes sont magnifiques et méritent tout à fait l'enthousiasme qu'ils semblent d'emblée susciter.
Tu fais très fort ce coup-là, bravo !
Ce n'est pas vendre la peau de l'ours l'iguane avant de l'avoir tué que de te féliciter, d'ores et déjà.
Cordialement, --Jebulon (talk) 17:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Iguana iguana Portoviejo 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iguana iguana Portoviejo 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manta Ec playa Murciélago.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the derelict building. --Mattbuck 07:17, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Ville photothèque 3-2011a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 20:48, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb Useldange Maison Faber 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Perhaps you can add geolocation.--Berthold Werner 09:16, 8 March 2011 (UTC)  Done Geotag added. --Cayambe 11:04, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manta Ecuador playa Murciélago 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 18:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Iguana iguana Portoviejo 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iguana iguana Portoviejo 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manta Ecuador playa Murciélago 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments excellent composition --Carschten 16:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort thüngen Dräi Eechelen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 14:09, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Cleanup after transfer to Commons

Hi! I do not agree that information like the one you removed here [1] is not needed. If name of the uploader is not the same as the author we need a good reason to why this is ok. When it is removed it is harder to "follow" the file and verify that it is ok. If you remove the information the risk that someone nominates the file for deletion (and the file gets deleted) is higher. --MGA73 (talk) 19:12, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Synagogue 01a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 20:39, 14 March 2011 (UTC) Comment there is 2 problème in the sky who need to be correct before promotion --Croucrou 21:43, 14 March 2011 (UTC) Info Thanks for noticing. New file (version) uploaded, will ask for deletion of the flawed file. --Cayambe 16:42, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Quercus robur en QIC

Bonjour Cayambe.

J'aime bien ton chêne remarquable.

Je trouve qu'il manque un peu d'air au dessus (tight crop), mais qu'en revanche il y a trop de "décor" inutile à droite et à gauche, ce qui en rend la composition perfectible à mon avis.

Peut-être qu'une vue verticale aurait été meilleure...

Qu'en penses-tu ? Si tu es d'accord avec mon constat, crois-tu pouvoir faire quelque chose ?

Amitiés--Jebulon (talk) 00:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Re-moi.

En vertu de l'adage "not words, facts", je t'ai répondu sous l'image, par un soutien. C'est beaucoup mieux désormais, et je suis sensible à ton argument de l'objet dans son contexte.

Au fait, merci de ton soutien pour mon mandrill. Tu auras noté que ce n'est pas moi qui l'ai proposé : je ne le trouve pas terrible, ils est un peu flou et brouillé, avec du "bruit" aussi (photo derrière une vitrine, musée sombre...). A l'époque, c'était le seul du genre, mais maintenant ceux de notre ami Archaeodontodaurus sont bien meilleurs !!

Bien à toi, --Jebulon (talk) 09:45, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cat close-up 2004 b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. Mattbuck 17:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

louis XIV

Merci, mon ami, pour cette promotion de la statue de louis 14. Mais je dois à la vérité d'avouer qu'il n'y a pas de découpage; ce n'est que le ciel de Versailles qui était ainsi ce jour-là. Ce fait ne rend la photo ni meilleure ni pire, mais c'est ainsi. J'ai au moins su conserver netteté, détails, couleur du bronze et contraste. Amicalement,--Jebulon (talk) 01:14, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinbettingen Quercus robur 2011 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Bonnevoie plaque Unio'n.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes it is, in spite of a very slight distortion IMO.--Jebulon 23:10, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vianden René Engelmann monument a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 15:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Euston station

Hi, I just wanted to check you promoted the image you meant to with this edit - your summary says promote Euston, but the image you promoted was of Birmingham New Street. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Cercle municipal top.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 08:11, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

remarque

Il y a, dans beaucoup de tes photographies, un côté intimiste et une paix intérieure, qui font du bien à ces qui les regarde. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:19, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manternach Fuussebau door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 19:17, 5 April 2011 (UTC)Translation added for the greek inscription --Jebulon 15:17, 6 April 2011 (UTC) Thanks, Jebulon. --Cayambe 09:22, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilwerwiltz St Willibrord Chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --Carschten 16:12, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb Lellingen Narcissus population.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 08:16, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place Clairefontaine Luxembourg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice view --Taxiarchos228 03:49, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg pl Guillaume II rue du Fossé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but: could be sharper and why looks a picture with the great D700 like this? not the best lence I quess. --Taxiarchos228 10:39, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilwerwiltz Gare 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well framed. --Elekhh 06:05, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colmar-Berg House 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good compoistion, well balanced lighting Gnangarra 08:32, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mersch Maison Servais front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Temple d'Athena

Bonsoir Cayambe. Merci de ton message. je vois bien la tache au dessus du bonhomme, mais pas celles de droite. Peux-tu me les marquer s'il te plaît ? Merci.--Jebulon (talk) 20:59, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

• Voilà, je crois que c'est bon maintenant. Merci de ta vigilance !--Jebulon (talk) 21:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mersch Maison Servais from park 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Ankara 16:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicolas Welter Monument Mersch 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 17:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City monument Guillaume II statue 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb City Limpertsberg crossroads.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not a very exciting composition, but as you pointed out useful. The quality is sufficient for QI.--Ankara 09:40, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City église Saint-Alphonse ext a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok imho --Berthold Werner 08:35, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Square Guillaume II towards Notre-Dame Cathedral April 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 13:39, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecuador Manta Murciélago fishermen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City St-Alphonse portal sup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Ankara 21:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb Mersch Gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's a QI to me. --Ximonic 23:36, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Grand Ducal Palace coat of arms Lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 17:30, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Oiseaux et taches helléniques

Salut Ô mon Luxembourgo-équatorien préféré

Les petits points noirs sont bien des oiseaux (si, si)

Mais les taches sont bien des taches (je les ai vues).

Je corrige ça dès que possible.

Merci de ta vigilance et de tes compliments, --Jebulon (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

 Done--Jebulon (talk) 17:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg pl Guillaume II vers rue de la Reine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 17:44, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Luxemb Hagelsdorf Church.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! J A Zinnen Plaque Knuedler Luxemb City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and useful--Jebulon 15:22, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb Hagelsdorf Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Ankara 19:52, 11 May 2011 (UTC)  Comment Same image but with correct file name now. --Cayambe 05:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb City square Guillaume II passage H de ville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 17:01, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Croix de Hinzert Memorial 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 16:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb Bridel oak rue Nic Goedert 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 09:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Promotion "Sea of Galilee"

Hallo, irgend etwas war da falsch. Da ist ein Datum eingetragen, das in der Zukunft liegt ???? Dort steht: --Cayambe 07:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC) --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:09, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Das war ja kein großes Problem. Ich dachte die Zeit wird von den Wikimedia Servern genommen aber das ist vielleicht auf der QIC Seite anders. --Berthold Werner (talk) 20:41, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuhaeusgen Chapel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 20:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crucita Ecuador beach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 19:37, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aarnescht L Reichling monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Lmbuga 19:31, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Aline Mayrisch monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo -- George Chernilevsky 13:34, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Glacis Chapel 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very nice --Taxiarchos228 20:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Esch-sur-Sure plague monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 08:05, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Heliconius-charithonia-paarung.jpg

Hallo Cayambe, entschuldige bitte meine verspätete Antwort zu Deinem Kommentar aber ich war im Urlaub :o). Ich habe mir das Bild gerade nochmal bewußt angeschaut und Du hast vollkommen recht; es fehlt tatsächlich ein Stück Hintergrund! Vielen Dank für den Tip und viele Grüße H. Krisp (talk) 20:51, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potamocypris humilis carapace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good: usefull--Lmbuga 14:14, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Lintgen Heuardt house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 17:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Wercollier_Interpenetration_Strasbourg_01.jpg

File:Wercollier_Interpenetration_Strasbourg_01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grcampbell (talk) 18:03, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Lintgen Chapel rue de Diekirch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 21:01, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Lintgen Heuardt house door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. I added it in some categories --Jebulon 14:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Bravo

Pour l'image du jour! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

QI

attention tu n'as pas signé ta dernière image en QI... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:19, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Clausen Michel Rodange house of death.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 15:57, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Iguane

Bonjour Cayambe,

Je revois avec plaisir, en image du jour, ton iguane équatorien.

Félicitations renouvelées pour cette belle photo justement primée!

Amicalement,--Jebulon (talk) 08:00, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Clausen Michel Rodange Plaque a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 10:45, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank

Hi, thanks for recognizing my work like a high quality.

This image is also put to the vote as Featured picture candidates, if you have time take a look of this voting. Thank You - M•Komorniczak ^-talk- 14:50, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Kehlen 1 rue Schoenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:32, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City rue de Beggen 170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. There is something wrong with the nomination time. --Berthold Werner 15:32, 26 August 2011 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for noticing, now corrected, something's going wrong in my computer... I'll try to fix it.--Cayambe 18:04, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mersch Maison Servais front wide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:55, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Val Fleuri windmill ruins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 07:29, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Ginkgo biloba in Luxemburg

copyright violation?

your image

Hallo Cayambe, das muß ein RIESEN-Zufall oder eine Copyright Verletzung sein!? Beide Bilder zeigen die gleichen Wolkenstrukturen. Das Bild mußte also von "Euch" beiden zum gleichen Zeitpunk geknipst worden sein. Oder bist Du es beides? Ich frage nur weil es gerade ein Thema auf der deutschen KEB-Seite ist. Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:02, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Alchemist,

das ist KEIN Zufall, ich war ganz alleine als ich im August 2008 dieses Foto (und andere) von diesem Baum in Luxemburg geknipst habe. Du schreibst genau richtig , dass die Wolkenstruktur die gleiche ist... es handelt sich also ganz sicher um das gleiche Bild. Links hat der 'Autor' Ginkgotree den Balkon weggeklont, was, besonders im Pflanzenkübel, bei 100% deutlich zu erkennen ist. Den Balkon hatte ich damals mit ins Bild genommen, damit man sieht, von wo aus das Foto geknipst wurde (heute würde ich das nicht mehr tun). Es handelt sich also klar um eine Copyright-Verletzung, das der Autor des Bildes nicht genannt wird. Fast noch schlimmer ist, dass die Schärfe im Copyvio-Bild verstümmelt wurde. Danke noch einmal für den Hinweis und herzliche Grüße aus Luxemburg, --Cayambe (talk) 16:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

noch eine copyvio?

Ich habe noch ein Bild. Ist es auch von Dir? Grüße aus Norddeutschland, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Nein, dieses Bild ist nicht von mir. Es 'riecht' aber irgendwie gleichfalls nach einer Copyvio. :-) --Cayambe (talk) 16:34, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinbettingen château d'eau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo -- George Chernilevsky 19:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Hamm church plaques.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition. --Someone35 17:01, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Bofferdange Fagus sylvatica purpurea .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Hobscheid church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very nice --Taxiarchos228 12:08, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

QIC

Bonsoir Claude,

Félicitation pour tes jolies photographies et merci pour ton soutien à un presque "cousin" (né dans la Province de Luxembourg).

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 18:01, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City rue du Curé Mamergaass street sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:12, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg pl Guillaume II vers rue de la Reine wide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 07:26, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Hamm Schleifmühle villa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 19:32, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City rue du Curé 10 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me - Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sula sula Galápagos isla Genovesa preening 2004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think you should remove the noise in the picture, it's way too visible. Also, is that snow in the background or volcanic ash? Question: Who is speaking? --Cayambe 14:49, 14 September 2011 (UTC) Sorry I forgot to sign my comment, it's me--Someone35 13:19, 15 September 2011 (UTC) Denoised. The white background are droppings of the colony of Boobies. The remaining background is volcanic rock. There is no snow on the Galápagos. --Cayambe 20:22, 18 September 2011 (UTC) k, promoted. I thought like that too but the background really looks like snow.--Someone35 13:09, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Tétange Centre culturel Schungfabrik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Hôtel de Bourgogne front sept 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 22:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Catalpa promu

Bonjour Cayambe,

Je te remercie d'avoir promu mes feuilles et fruits de Catalpa bignonioides, mais comme tu y as mis une réserve, je ne veux pas que tu croies que je ne m'intéresse qu'au label et qu'une fois celui-ci obtenu, je ne tiens pas compte des commentaires de mes pairs !

Tu dois bien te douter, en ayant vu l'image, que j'ai volontairement inclus dans celle-ci la partie du tronc que tu souhaitais voir disparaitre.

Il s'agit bien du tronc du catalpa dont j'ai montré fleurs et fruits, et j'ai pensé que l'inclure pour partie ajoutait à l'intérêt documentaire de l'image.

De plus, je trouve que ça agrémente la composition. Mon cadrage aurait été probablement différent sans le tronc.

Voilà. À défaut peut-être de te convaincre, j'espère que cette explication t'aura éclairé sur mon choix.

Merci en tous cas de ta bienveillance. Reçois toutes mes amitiés,--Jebulon (talk) 22:56, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour Cayambe,

Merci de ton message. Pour le catalpa, c'est finalement, comme tu dis, une question d'appréciation personnelle.

Pour la déformation sur ton image, je comprends ce que tu veux dire, et c'est vrai que la distortion (y compris du bac au premier plan à gauche) est inévitable compte tenu des circonstances. Mais elle heurte un peu, ou l'oeil ou plutôt le cerveau.

Moi, mon problème, c'est la profondeur de champ. Je n'ai pas encore bien intégré le concept, et je suis donc confronté à des manques de netteté, par exemple, que je ne sais pas gérer. Cadrage, exposition, composition, je maîtrise à peu près, et j'arrive à avoir l' "oeil". mais la profondeur de champ, c'est différent. C'est de la physique optique, et je ne suis pas un matheux ! ça manque de concret pour moi. Je ne comprends pas le sens des remarques du genre "mais pourquoi F9, le sujet ne s'y prête pas !". Et c'est vrai que ça ressortit souvent pour moi du domaine du pifomètre !

Je vais m'atteler à la question, mais il faut que je trouve une explication vulgarisatrice, ce que j'ai vu jusqu'à présent est trop scientifique pour ma pauvre cervelle. Si tu as un lien vers un site, ce sera volontiers !

Dordogne: c'est vraiment un beau pays, avec beaucoup de choses à voir. J'ai mitraillé énormément, mais comme toujours, il y a beaucoup de déchet et de nombreuses erreurs techniques dont je suis bien conscient....

Mais tu ne me verras jamais (ou très rarement), propulser de moi-même en "consensual review" une de mes photos rejetées, même si parfois j'argumente, comme pour le Catalpa en entier qui me parait effectivement être une Image de Qualité...

J'essaie aussi, dans les QIC, de varier les sujets de mes images, et même peut-être de surprendre le spectateur, en montrant des choses différentes pour ne pas lasser. Je déteste l'alignement, comme à la parade, de dizaines de photos successives de détails d'églises qui se ressemblent toutes, qui sont inutilisables parce que mal catégorisées, mal décrites, et qui ne sont présentées que pour l'accumulation de labels...

Mais du coup je m'autocensure, car si je ne me retenais pas, je ferais des commentaires trop cinglants.

Bien à toi,--Jebulon (talk) 08:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb City pl de Clairefontaine St Maximin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:43, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City 3 rue du Curé .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Nice Monument aux morts 1ère guerre mondiale 01.jpg

File:Nice Monument aux morts 1ère guerre mondiale 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 23:51, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Cayambe, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:44, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Bullfighting_in_Quito

Category:Bullfighting_in_Quito has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Closeapple (talk) 10:33, 29 November 2011 (UTC)