User talk:Cayambe/Archive14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hollerich – Forage chaussée rue Guido-Oppenheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --BigDom 21:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg-ville –Corniche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque 1797, Puerto de la Cruz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corniche – Grund – Kirchberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz – Padre Pio, Iglesia N. S. de la Paz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 22:52, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bech-Gare, Amphithéâtre – sculpture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 18:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz – Ntra. Sra. de la Paz, plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phalsbourg – Hôtel de ville, sept. 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Telmo rear facade, Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Marie-Adélaïde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 20:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife – Montaña de las Arenas 2020a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tenerife, Puerto de la Cruz – Calle San Juan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grondhaff, Hôtel Brimer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 21:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortulus – musée du Vieux Pérouges 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 16:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parking Campus Geesseknäppchen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pérouges, rue du Prince, 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lône du Content 2022 06 – Ain, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pérouges, monument du jubilé de 1886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pérouges, place de la Halle dite du Tilleul, 2022a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pérouges – descente depuis place de la Halle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Nice shot, and nice place. --Terragio67 15:51, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 15:51, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hostellerie du Vieux Pérouges, large.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia Ntra Sra de la Paz – Consecration plaque 2006 large.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit to noisy. Should be fixable. --MB-one 15:16, 22 January 2023 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks, noise reduced. Ok now? --Cayambe 17:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now --MB-one 11:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pérouges – Monument aux morts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Jean-Braconnier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:27, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1 Station tram et bâtiment Jean-Braconnier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is good but I miss a cat about the station, the current cat is too generic --Poco a poco 17:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Tram station cat added. It had to be created. --Cayambe 19:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you, I was rather thinking about something like "Tram stations in Lyon", but if you created this one, the better --Poco a poco 20:10, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Jean-Braconnier 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Jean-Braconnier 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Moutte, commune de Viviers-sur-Rhône 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:03, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Commune de Viviers-sur-Rhône, paysage rural.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:55, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viviers, vignoble à la Moutte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viviers, vignoble et maisons à la Moutte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:44, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:13, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UCB-Lyon-1, Campus La Doua, bâtiment Charles-Darwin 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 19:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carrefour sur D859 près St-Restitut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luxembourg Cents – Restau Centser Roud Haus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Végétation près Saint-Restitut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:16, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 15:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One and the same[edit]

I cannot help from believing that A1Cafel and Adamant1 are one and the same User. :-( Cayambe (talk) 18:27, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grapsus adscensionis in Puerto de la Cruz 2023a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz – Gift shop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Best wishes[edit]

Christmas star decoration at a window with the reflection of a sunset Happy Holidays, Cayambe

Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!

Aristeas (talk) 17:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays and best wishes![edit]

Happy holidays!
Merry christmas!
Best wishes for 2024!

-- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:06, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays![edit]

  * Happy Holidays! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC)   [reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz, street musician, 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mirador de La Paz, guitarist, 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is good; it might need a personality rights template though. --Plozessor 05:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC). ✓ Done Thanks, personality rights template added. --Cayambe 10:12, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays[edit]

  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

Pierre André (talk) 17:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays![edit]

  * Happy Holidays! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Wesołych Świąt! Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paseo de la Costa from Mirador de la Paz 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Laitche 15:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tenerife, Valle de la Orotava from El Lance 2023a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:14, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz - Playa Jardín y Castillo San Felipe Dec 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spathodea campanulata in Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 10:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paseo del Guaydil, Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz, Paseo del Acebuche – Iglesia Nuestra Señora de la Paz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Egretta garzetta 05 in Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 19:59, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]