User talk:Cats' photos

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Cats' photos!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:58, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tue recenti modifiche[edit]

Ciao, volevo condividere la mia idea a proposito di queste tue modifiche. In questo caso la categoria contiene infatti qualcosa di poco chiaro ma in generale io, come comunque hanno condiviso altri utenti con me, tendo a mettere come categoria "madre" quella dell'edificio nella sua destinazione d'uso originale, così quindi quando una villa è nata come villa ma poi è diventata un museo privilegio l'aspetto villa (che è stata progettata da qualcuno con un particolare stile architettonico e costruita in un certo anno o periodo) e poi il museo (che potrebbe essere etnografico, pinacoteca, archeologico, etc. etc. con nessuna diretta attinenza alla storia della struttura che lo contiene). Come esempio che conosco bene Category:Villa Badoer contiene in una delle sue barchesse il Category:Museo archeologico nazionale (Fratta Polesine) che però segue una ramificazione di categorie differente pur essendo nella stessa struttura. :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 02:42, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perdonami nuovamente, seguendo questa modifica, se un edificio (building, genericamente) è evidentemente un palazzo in quanto le fonti lo identificano come palazzo, perché rimuovi la categoria "Palaces in" per rimettere il file nella categoria più generica? Non dico che potresti anche avere le tue ragioni, solo che vorrei che tu le condividessi così da fare tutti un lavoro di categorizzazione omogeneo e non "a sensazione". Mi piacerebbe avere una tua opinione, grazie :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 17:40, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prima di tutto chiedo scusa per eventuali manchevolezze da me commesse nel tentativo di migliorare la classificazione delle immagini a causa della mia scarsa dimestichezza. Tuttavia penso che la collocazione da me scelta del Palazzo dell'Amministrazione Provinciale sia corretta, poichè in lingua inglese il termine "palace" indica principalmente una magione gentilizia e non un edificio amministrativo, qual'è il fabbricato in questione che non è stato progettato per scopi diversi. Del resto, non essendo un grande esperto di lingue straniere, prima di correggere la collocazione ho visto la definizione di Wikipedia in lingua inglese che ti allego: " In many parts of Europe, the term is also applied to ambitious private mansions of the aristocracy. Many historic palaces are now put to other uses such as parliaments, museums, hotels or office buildings. The word is also sometimes used to describe a lavishly ornate building used for public entertainment or exhibitions." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cats' photos (talk • contribs) 18:38, 01 December 2015 (UTC) Riguardo alla questione inerente a Villa Frigerj, penso che l'inserimento della categoria "Villa Comunale" non sia esatta, data l'usuale accezione con cui noi abitanti usiamo il termine "villa", che è a Chieti così in altre parti d'Italia sinonimo di "parco". Sebbene i giardini siano state in passato pertinenze di Villa Frigerj, oggi con "Villa Comunale" indichiamo il parco e non la vecchia magione del Barone Frigerj, che è ora associata soprattutto al museo che in essa ha trovato ubicazione. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cats' photos (talk • contribs) 18:47, 01 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non devi chiedere scusa, si tratta solo di chiarirsi tra colleghi wikimediani, anzi la tua citazione di quanto indica en.wiki è interessante e illuminate per capire il loro POV. :-) Però ricordiamoci che la lingua inglese è più "criptica" perché più povera di termini specifici, anche se tendono a privilegiare fonti nella loro lingua non sono convinto che dobbiamo prendere ciò che dicono per oro colato. @Marcok: tu che ne pensi?--Threecharlie (talk) 18:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Presumed vatican stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 10:25, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emma Morano.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vätte (talk) 20:48, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.

We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules.

In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files.

Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions.

Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  русский  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  বাংলা   +/−

Vegetable TALK 12:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

L'accusa è infondata, visto che nella descrizione del video realizzato dalla stessa emittente televisiva TVSEI è indicato il marchio della licenza 3.0-BY--Cats' photos (talk) 12:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cristiano Vignali.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Melquíades (msg) 22:42, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Courthouse of Pescara.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 06:47, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Human races according to Coon (collage).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:48, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! But the current image does not include Hazaras in Central Asia (Kabul, Afghanistan or Balkh, Afghanistan), it is about the Hazaras in Southern Asia (Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan).--Shxahxh (talk) 19:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Collage of ethnic groups.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as one of the images (File:Warren H Williams.png) in your collage is copyvio-suspected, you should remove / replace it. --Túrelio (talk) 07:21, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Collage[edit]

Greetings! The collage contains some copyrighted files (File:Mongolia 083.JPG‎), one file with facial marks, one file with filed down teeth, and a low resolution screenshot. I've corrected those files, and tagged the duplicate upload as per COM:Dupe. Kind Regards-- Soupforone (talk) 18:26, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why you are so offensive: if these photo are copyrighted, you will be able to propose their deletion and I will modify my college.--Cats' photos (talk) 18:34, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I already tagged the file for deletion and corrected the collage for copyright, facial marking, teeth filing, and the low resolution screenshot. Kind Regards-- Soupforone (talk) 18:39, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2017 Lucoli air ambulance crash (Rete8).png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2017 Lucoli air ambulance crash (Rete8).png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ariadacapo (talk) 10:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:35, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Why do you insist on removing Category:Social problems from Category:Slums?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:52, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Human races according to Coon (collage).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 22:57, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Germano Mosconi.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Caulfield (talk) 12:38, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File: Carlo Ripa di Meana.jpg[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello Cats' photos, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Carlo Ripa di Meana.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Hi, I had uploaded it on it.wiki with the license "PD-Italia". But it was made in 1986 (see the flag of "Lega per l'Ambiente" - Legambiente -, founded in 1980). --151 cp (talk) 19:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carlo Ripa di Meana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:19, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Carlo Ripa di Meana.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Carlo Ripa di Meana.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Missvain (talk) 22:35, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paul Casimir Marcinkus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Carnby (talk) 15:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ 🩺💉 06:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you contacted me for this decision? I don't remember to have been involved with this category, sorry. @Doclys Cats' photos (talk) 15:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]