User talk:Cassianto

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Cassianto!
File:Stanley Holloway aged 10.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

J Milburn (talk) 17:37, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:19, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Cadum 1912 Mistinguett Portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GermanJoe (talk) 15:22, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cassianto2.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ubcule (talk) 23:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cassianto1.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ubcule (talk) 23:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Modified version of one of your images: File:Snaresbrook Crown Court 1 (brightened).jpg[edit]

Hi,

Just to let you know that I left a reply to your comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cassianto1.jpeg, and that- as a side effect of checking the background of that case- I noticed and uploaded a filtered version of one of your other images as File:Snaresbrook Crown Court 1 (brightened).jpg to increase the brightness.

I've left the credit to you, since it's your image and my adjustments weren't (IMHO) significant enough to be credit-worthy, but I do appreciate that the "feel" of the photo was slightly altered and you might or might not like this (it's maybe slightly more obviously "HDR-ish" than the natural look I'd originally intended to preserve). Feel free to modify the credit it you're not happy with it being presented entirely as your own work.

(The original version is still at File:Snaresbrook Crown Court 1.jpg).

All the best,

Ubcule (talk) 15:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hi[edit]

@Cassianto yes, admins can give themselves privs. In that particular instance all non-admin accounts were getting blocked at Wikiconf 2015 due to what I misinterpreted as a broken private editfilter - when instead it turned out to be an autoblocked user triggering an autoblock whenever he attempted to view an image - which I ended up guessing, though four or five CU's were trying to figure it out at the same time. There was more than one unblock being discussed in that discussion as well; the reason I supported requiring him to discuss unblocks with blocking admins (or achieving consensus at AN) before performing them was in large part because in the not too distant past he had accepted a god-awful unblock request for one of my blocks, where the unblock request itself actually contained a blockable personal attack. If Wikicommons overlords finds my tool use to be similarly misguided I wouldn't at all oppose a similiar restriction, although "must consult checkusers before undoing their blocks in the future" is pretty much just reiterating policy - obviously I'd be crusin' for a bruisin' if I made the same dumb mistake again. I stand behind the blocks you quote - blocking meatpuppet swarms (like Giano Cassianto Corbett Ched Bishonen) is generally a good thing until at a bare minimum they restrict their discussion to talk pages. I'm a bit confused by your AE2 diff - I don't generally view admonishments as meaningful, and have consistently held that opinion. I was making a request that AC either do nothing to BK, or take stronger sanction if they found it appropriate - just not to admonish him. I didn't agree with your decision making by harassing Sarah, but would rather have seen that case pass with no remedy against you than with an admonishment since you get away with a lot Cas. User:Kevin Gorman | talk page 06:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LevonJordan (talk • contribs) 01:10, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your email[edit]

Hi. The reason the administrator undid your edit was because you added the wrong template. The template you used is the one that is meant for the corresponding deletion request page rather than the file page. I have fixed this error. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:26, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, to add one thing, the copyright tag is only for speedy deletion, which is for egregious and obvious violations. Anything which is unclear should go to a discussion. This works exactly the same as Articles for Deletion on English Wikipedia. While it is unusual for a user to remove a copyvio tag on their own image, it was ultimately choice. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:29, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]