User talk:Caronna/Archiv

Hallo Caronna,
darf ich mal erfahren, warum du Category:Burg Monschau erst geleert und dann einen (übrigens unvollständigen) Löschantrag gestellt hast, ohne eine Begründung dafür anzugeben? Und ergänzend, warum du sämtliche spezifische Kat. von File:MonschauKircheOhneTurm.JPG entfernt und stattdessen eine allgemeinere Kat. eingesetzt hast - also genau das Gegenteil von dem, was die Commons-policy dazu vorgibt? Hab gerade gesehen, dass du dasselbe mit vielen Bilder von Monschau gemacht und noch eine unbegründete rfd gegen eine spez. cat gestellt hast. Da das klar gegen unsere policy geht, möchte ich dafür wirklich eine gute Begründung. --Túrelio (talk) 19:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

gerne! so viele un sinnige kats bei so einem kleinen ort! was soll der blödsinn? ich hatte vor erst mal alle zu löschen und dann gemäßigt wieder aufzubauen. es ist auch blöd, wenn du bilder aus monschau suchst, durch die tief verschachtelten kats ist das unmöglich! kats sollen helfen, nicht erschweren! Die kirche hat im übrigen schon lange den Turm, oder besser die turmspitze wieder! (willst du etwa jede baustelle an einer kirche hier haben?) Grüße aus der Eifel Caronna (talk) 21:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

O.k. das kann ich grundsätzlich nachvollziehen. Allerdings wäre es bei einem so eingreifenden Umbau einer bereits vorhandenen Struktur definitiv besser gewesen, deinen Plan erstmals entweder auf einer Monschau-bezogenen Disku oder im (deutschsprachigen) Commons:Forum vorzustellen, damit andere daran Interessierte (z.B. die, die Monschau-Bilder beigetragen oder die cat-Struktur mit aufgebaut haben) nicht einfach vor vollendete Tatsachen gestellt werden bzw. die Möglichkeit haben, Verbesserungsvorschläge zu machen. Das wäre anders gewesen, wenn hier noch keinerlei cat-Struktur bestanden hätte.

Vielleicht noch zu deinem Punkt wenn du bilder aus monschau suchst ... - dazu ist eigentlich eine Gallerie da, dass man einen Überblück über das verfügbare Bildmaterial bekommt. Die Gallerie Monschau ist tatsächlich noch sehr ausbaufähig. Die unvollständigen Löschanträge solltest du aber noch komplettieren, sondern werden die nicht ausgeführt. Gruß --Túrelio (talk) 22:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, das mit dem Forum war mir unbekannt! woher auch? Jetzt ein Problem: mein englisch ist äußerst mangelhaft! ich weis nicht wie ein korrekter Löschantrag aussieht (gibts eigentlich so was wie schnelllöschen?! Auch von wegen englisch: das ist ein problem mit den Kats! Wie soll mensch die einordnen wenn er wenig englich kann? (gilt nicht nur für monschau), ich hab viel Bilder eingestellt aber einordnen? unmöglich. Ein weitere manko der Monschau kats: wäre es nicht besser wenn die kats immer mit Monschau anfingen? also kat Monschau, Burg oder Monschau, Rur?

zu den Galerien: es scheint 2 Fraktionen zu geben: einige bevorzugen die Galerien und andere kümmern sich nicht drum und hauen nur eine kat ans ende. die Kats scheinen bevorzugt zu werden, dort sind die meisten Bilder zu finden, wenn mensch den richtigen kat gefunden hat. so, danke das du dich gemeldet hast... Grüße aus der Eifel Caronna (talk) 08:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Caronna,

ich hab momentan nicht genug Zeit um mich selbst drum zu kümmern. Also ich frage immer auf Commons:Village pump (engl.) oder Commons:Forum (deutsch), wenn ich z.B. nicht herausbekommen kann wie eine Kategorie (zuletzt z.B. Krippenmuseum) auf englisch am besten benannt wird. Dort bekommt man meistens hilfreiche Antworten. Du kannst das ja auf Commons:Forum machen, wo deutsch gesprochen wird, viele Leser aber doch auch englisch können, so dass dir entsprechend geraten wird. Gruß --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Mir gehts auch um den umgekerten weg: ich habe ein Bild und will es in die dazugehörende kat einordnen, oft finde ich nicht mal ein grundkat! Grüße aus der Eifel Caronna (talk) 14:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Das mache in mir unbekannten Gebieten von Commons immer noch so, daß ich auf einen Artikel in der deutschen Wikipedia gehe, der thematisch dem Bild nahesteht und dort ein Bild anklicke und nacvhschaue, in welcher Kategorie es ist. Dann findet sich ein oder zwei Kategorienebenen darunter die passende Grundcat für das eigene Bild. Wenn nicht Commonsleute für Pferdebilder die Category:Horses angeben und für Hundbilder die Category:Dogs reicht das, damit das Bild gefunden und richtig kategoriesiert wird. Kersti (talk) 20:18, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Italian_greyhund.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Italian_greyhund.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Italian_greyhund.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

\mu/ 12:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

sorry, versteh ich nicht! das Bild stammt von der Englichen WIkipedia. Der lizensbaustein wurde von dort übernommen Grüße aus der Eifel Caronna (talk) 20:37, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

1. Hi Caronna, sorry für den automatischen Warnbaustein. Leider fehlen Autoren- und Quellenangaben völlig. Ich seh bei [1] außerdem nur, dass das Foto von petplanet.co.uk stammt – für en.wikipedia.org vermutlich als "Fair Use" deklariert (was Commons nicht akzeptiert).

2. Du hattest PD zu PD-self geändert. Hast du das Foto wirklich selbst gemacht? Wenn ja, ist die Löschwarnung natürlich obsolet. Dann sollte beim Bild aber auch unzweideutig stehen, dass du der Fotograf bist. -- \mu/ 19:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

2 ne, des kam son blöder Warnbaustein! PD alleine war die kennzeichnung im englischen wiki.

1 ist halt ein problem wenn das ursprüngliche Bild im englischen gelöscht wurde. ich habe es vor jahren nach commonce gepackt, ohne das englisch zu löschen. Ich fürchte so was wird noch sehr oft vorkommen. früher waren die copyrightbausteine noch nicht so spezifiziert (was heute zu einer Warnung führt). wenn dann noch die Quelle gelöscht wird ist nicht mehr alles nachvollziehbar. Ich weis nur das früher das bild in der englischen stand mit dem copyrigtvermerk PD. laäßt sich so was nicht herauskriegen? die alten versionen müssten doch noch vorhenden sein Grüße aus der Eifel Caronna (talk) 09:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Leonberger bitch photo

Just wanted to say that I loved your photo, which is being used in the English Wikipedia article on Leonberger. Thanks for posting that. Dunke. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 00:53, 1 April 2009 (UTC) Stan

File:Hundefrisbee ret.jpg

File:Hundefrisbee ret.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

• File:Spanischer mastiff2.JPG

BotMultichillT 20:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

E-mail permission and OTRS

Hi Caronna, I noticed you uploaded some images like File:Mastiff 2.jpg where you received permission from the author by e-mail. These permission e-mails must be forwarded to OTRS to keep on file, or else we may have to delete the file - see Commons:OTRS/de. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Dcoetzee (talk) 11:42, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

sorry! Ichkann nicht besonders Englisch! ich weis nicht worum es geht Grüße aus der Eifel Caronna (talk) 17:58, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Caronna, ich springe hier mal als Muttersprachler ein ;-). Es geht um das Bild File:Mastiff 2.jpg, das laut Upload ja nicht von dir selbst ist, wofür du aber eine Genehmigung erhalten hast. Es reicht aber nicht aus, dass du einfach erwähnst eine solche Genehmigung erhalten zu haben, du müsstest diese vielmehr, wie es auf Commons inzwischen Standard ist, an OTRS weiterreichen. Schau einfach mal in deiner Emailablage nach und leite die Genehmigung an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org weiter. Falls du keine Genehmigung mehr findest, müsstest du wohl oder übel den Autor nochmal kontaktieren und ihn um die schriftliche Erteilung einer Genehmigung bitten. Das ist weniger Arbeit als es aussieht: Geh einfach nach Commons:Emailvorlagen, kopiere dir die "Einverständniserklärung", setze dort den o.g. Dateinamen oder die komplette URL ein, trage die Lizenzbezeichnung ein, maile dann alles an den Rechteinhaber und bitte ihn seinen Namen und das Datum drunterzusetzen und es von seiner Emailadresse an die o.g. Wikimediaadresse zurückzumailen. --Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

das Bild stammt noch aus der OTRS Zeit! Ich habe noch ne Menge Bilder mehr. Ich habe große sorgfalt dahin gelegt das ich eine Freigabe bekommen habe, teilweise längereren Emailwechsel. Weils so lange her ist werde ich nicht mehr alle erreichen können. Ich könnte eine Erklärung an Eides statt abgeben das die Bilder sicher sind. Jannst ja mal auf meine deutsche Benutzerseite schauen,bei Fotos, dort unteren Bereich. sind ne ganze Menge... gibts keine einfachere Lösung? Grüße aus der Eifel Caronna (talk) 06:59, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Du meintest wohl "aus der vor-OTRS Zeit". Also "Erklärung an Eides" scheint mir (für dich) zu riskant, weil du dann u.U. auch für Folgeschäden haften würdest, falls doch mal ein Urheber gegen einer Drittnutzer klagt. Machs doch erstmal für das eine Hundebild (falls du mehrere Fotos vom selben Urheber hast, kannst du die in eine Genehmigungsmail zusammenfassen). Die Website, die ja ausdrücklich genannt ist, trägt halt einen (C)-Vermerk. Falls sich das "Problem" wirklich häufen sollte, könnte´n wir das mal im Forum diskutieren. --Túrelio (talk) 07:08, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

leider hat es sich schon gehäuft :( ein oder 2 Bilder wurden schon gelöscht (waren unwichtig) Grüße aus der Eifel Caronna (talk) 16:10, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Caronna!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Hanomag Perfekt 300 b.JPG was uncategorized on 5 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Fendt Dieselross b.JPG was uncategorized on 5 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Kesternich Kirche.jpg was uncategorized on 14 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:33, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Kesternich Grotte.jpg was uncategorized on 14 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:33, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Kesternich B25.jpg was uncategorized on 14 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:33, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Agility

Agility has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

201.220.215.13 17:32, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

was soll den das? Ich interpprtiere das als Vandalismus Grüße aus der Eifel Caronna (talk) 19:59, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Bangkaew_Dog.jpg

File:Bangkaew_Dog.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 00:07, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Stephanitz.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stephanitz.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Stephanitz.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rosenzweig δ 11:48, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Charles Cruft.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Charles Cruft.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Charles Cruft.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rosenzweig δ 20:00, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Laika.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Laika.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Yellowcard 09:25, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Leonberger.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Leonberger.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Yellowcard 09:26, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Maremma.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Maremma.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Yellowcard 09:28, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Mastiff1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mastiff1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Yellowcard 09:28, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Caronna, ist es zutreffend, dass bei den 3 auf COM:AN zur Löschung befohlenen Bilder (File:Shar pei.jpg, File:Shar-Pei2.jpg und File:Shar_pei_welpen.jpg) die Lizenz/Genehmigung der ursprünglichen Autors nicht mehr klärbar ist? --Túrelio 12:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Shar-Pei2.jpg

File:Shar-Pei2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Túrelio 13:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Shar pei welpen.jpg

File:Shar pei welpen.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Túrelio 13:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Shar pei.jpg

File:Shar pei.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Túrelio 13:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Caronna!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

• Image:Weimaraner hintergrund hell.jpg was uncategorized on 25 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Caronna, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 23:14, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:FCI

FCI has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

moogsi^(blah) 14:32, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Richelsley

Prima aufnahme...wichtig ist auch die abgebildete person am kreuz. Dies (person) ist der maßstab und eine größe, die allgemein bekannt ist und es somit möglich macht, sich einen eindruck über die gesamtgröße des felsens zu bilden. Danke und grüße in die nordeifel.--87.185.81.254 06:41, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Deine Bilder

Weshalb müllst Du die Kategorie „Germany“ zu? --Botaurus (talk) 01:49, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Stimmt (hatte ich nicht überlegt)! Was schlägst du vor zur -identifizierung in den Kats? Caronna (talk)

Die Bilder sind ja ansonsten in allen nötigen bzw. richtigen Kategorien (soweit ich das überschaue). Die Germany-Kategorie braucht also bloß aus den Bildern gelöscht. werden - am einfachsten mit „Hot Cat“. --Botaurus (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Could use your help

Can you help me with image File:Otterhund.jpg . Commons is threatening to delete again because the original source website is no longer in existance. I don't know what to do to save this image from being deleted.. You helped back in 2006 with added the otterhund club of america as part of the source. but i don't know how to resolve this issue. This is image is been in the Public Domain since well before i moved it to commons in 2006. I don't see the reason to delete it now. Thanks --Ltshears (talk) 18:10, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Mein Enlisch ist einfach zu schlecht. The picture otterhund is only a very small picture (302 × 186 ) like a stamp.Here are a better picture: File:Two_otterhounds.jpg Grüße aus der Eifel Caronna (talk) 20:57, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Caronna, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Caronna, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archiv⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Caronna,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo Caronna,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)