User talk:Cardinal Wurzel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Cardinal Wurzel!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
Pay attention to copyright
File:Hamish McHamish In Waterstones.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 13:53, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This was not a copyright violation. I took the picture, it belongs to me and I have uploaded it again. I trust there'll be no problem with it this time. Cardinal Wurzel (talk) 11:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Some help with your new upload[edit]

Hi Cardinal Wurzel: I have looked at your new uploads of Hamish (such a cute cat) and I find you uploaded two times. One time is nearly perfect, the other time is small. Because of the one perfect one, I am thinking to remove the small one, but since you have had such a difficult time with Commons so far, I wanted to talk to you about it first.

I think this file File:Hamish McHamish.jpg is the almost perfect one. This file File:Hamish In Bookshop.jpg is the one I would like to remove because it is a small version of the larger one and it shows more of what seems to be some artwork over his shoulder in the background. The larger file is cropped more tightly making any possible poster or whatever it is less the center of attention, or de minimus.

I wanted to let you know before I did anything so that you would not be upset or concerned by housekeeping! Also on the bigger file, could you go back into the editing and change one thing? Right below "author" is "permission" as shown here:

|author=[[User:Cardinal Wurzel|Cardinal Wurzel]] |permission=

Could you add the characters {{PD-self}} to follow "permission" like this?

|author=[[User:Cardinal Wurzel|Cardinal Wurzel]] |permission= {{PD-self}}

That will take care of any problems with the self license as you gave full rights in your simple statement, it seems to me that the PD-self license is probably closest to your desire, but to be sure, please read about it and the various licenses at COM:L.

The other thing I changed on your upload was I put Hamish into the Category (no pun intended) of "Domestic Cats" ... I typed [[Category:Domestic cats]] which puts the picture here with the rest of the domestic cats in need of sorting into finer categories. There may be other categories in which he could be added. For example, if his bookstore has a category, or there may be a category for bookstore cats. Wander around in the categories and see if perhaps there is an additional category to which to add him. If "bookstore cats" for an example is a sub-set of "domestic cats" when you put him in the finer category, you take him out of the larger enclosing category. Let me know if you need more help with this!

If you would write me back, either here or on my talk page, I will then proceed to take out the smaller Hamish photo. If I don't hear from you in a few days, I will probably just remove it, please don't be upset, the bigger one is better!!

Images with proper license and into a category or two are less likely to have problems with review. I really appreciate the time and effort you have put into contributing to Wiki Commons and I hope you will consider contributing more in the future. Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Subsequently INC removed the image and explained why. OTRS is not a hard process, I hope everything works out! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I am sorry this has been such a hard process, but for what it's worth, it's an adorable cat picture and I hope you will be taking and uploading many other images (cats and non-cats) for WikiCommons! Please consider taking photos of your area or neighborhood, interesting things in the world around you. We can always use more interesting educational images. Many towns in the U.S. only have one picture!! Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:36, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re-uploading deleted image[edit]

The Hamish image was deleted because it was previously published on http://bloomvc.com/project/hamish-mchamish. You need to email COM:OTRS with evidence that you are the copyright holder, and perhaps explain the connection with that website. You could also upload a full-resolution version of the image with original COM:EXIF to show you're the author. If you upload the image again without doing either of these, your account will be blocked. INeverCry 17:27, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]