User talk:Brakeet

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Brakeet!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:28, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

"Captured" aircraft

Hi Brakeet, The Vampire, Venom, MiG-15 and Hawker Hunter in the IAF museum are not captured aircraft. They were acquired elsewhere and were only painted to resemble Arab aircraft. I removed them from the relevant category. Poliocretes (talk) 17:53, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks , and sorry for my misunderstanding. --Brakeet (talk) 18:01, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Remerciements / Category:50e anniversaire du film La Grande Vadrouille à Meursault - Exposition de véhicules militaires

Bonjour, je voulais vous remercier pour le travail que vous avez effectué pour la catégorisation des véhicules militaires que je n'avais pas identifiés. Cordialement. François de Dijon (talk) 21:35, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Ise Mie Okage Yokocho 14.jpg

File:Ise Mie Okage Yokocho 14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Batholith (talk) 10:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:CROWS_II_(RWS)

CROWS II (RWS) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Geo Swan (talk) 12:56, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Type 1 gun tank Ho-I

Hi: here is another you may wish to make into a separate cat for the IJA AFV. There are two uploaded photos; it was the prototype for the Type 2 Gun tank Ho-I. Kierzek (talk) 18:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi: Thank you for the notice, Kierzek. best regards.--Brakeet (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Category:Firearms_by_calibre

Firearms by calibre has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Sanandros (talk) 07:49, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

IRA SR series experimental amphibious tanks

Category:Amphibious tanks has the SR series experimental tanks of the Imperial Japanese Army program included. I was thinking maybe the SR I, SR II and SR III should have their own category. BTW, there is not suppose to be a dash between SR and the number, but I only learned that later after I had already uploaded two of the photos. What do you think? Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 15:15, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice, Kierzek. At this time I dont have detailed knowledges about SR series amphibious tanks, (for example, differences in SR-II and SR-Ro. etc). dash between SR and the number, I think you may not have to worry about, thanks--Brakeet (talk) 03:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

I just thought it might be good to have a general Cat for Japanese Amphibious tanks, at this time. Not individual Cats for each model. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 16:09, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Category:Sonderkraftfahrzeug_111

Sonderkraftfahrzeug 111 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Josh (talk) 07:32, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Category:Flakpanzer_V_Coelian

Flakpanzer V Coelian has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Josh (talk) 02:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

SpaceX Falcon rocket family

Hello Brakeet. Regarding Category:SpaceX Falcon rocket family, would you object to me changing this to Category:Falcon (rocket) (currently a redirect) to match the naming scheme of the other rocket family categories? — Huntster (t @ c) 21:00, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks you Huntster, I agree with you. best regards.--Brakeet (talk) 01:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Brakeet,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Brakeet,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Tojinbo 2010 02.jpg

File:Tojinbo 2010 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Batholith (talk) 09:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Brakeet,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:ARL_V_39

Category:ARL_V_39 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Rots61 (talk) 21:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Regarding the ongoing disbanding of all interwar and post-WW2 categories of AFVs etc.

Please note that two users recently reached a "consensus" to disband the top-level category Military vehicles of the interwar period and decided that it gives them a right to disband all the subcategories without further discussion, and moreover to disband categories like Post-World War II tanks of the Soviet Union. You may state your opinion on that at COM:ANU#CfD scope? (Military vehicles of the interwar period) and COM:Categories for discussion/2020/01/Category:Interwar tanks in museums. Ain92 (talk) 14:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

CfD: College athletics programs

Hi, I have started a discussion to rename a large collection of categories, one or more of which you may have created or edited. Please see the discussion thread at Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/04/College athletics programs for details. Thanks, IagoQnsi (talk) 04:42, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Chikubu Island DSCN2001.jpg

File:Chikubu Island DSCN2001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Batholith (talk) 11:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Chikubu Island DSCN2000.jpg

File:Chikubu Island DSCN2000.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Batholith (talk) 11:18, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Chikubu Island DSCN1994.jpg

File:Chikubu Island DSCN1994.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Batholith (talk) 11:19, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Sonderkraftfahrzeug_181

Sonderkraftfahrzeug 181 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Josh (talk) 00:11, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Taiyo Park 0001 14.jpg

And also:

• File:Taiyo Park 0001 16.jpg
• File:Taiyo Park 0001 17.jpg
• File:Taiyo Park 0001 18.jpg
• File:Taiyo Park 0001 19.jpg
• File:Taiyo Park 0001 20.jpg
• File:Taiyo Park 0001 21.jpg
• File:Taiyo Park 0001 22.jpg
• File:Taiyo Park 0001 23.jpg
• File:Taiyo Park 0001 24.jpg
• File:Taiyo Park 0001 25.jpg
• File:Taiyo Park 0001 26.jpg
• File:Taiyo Park 0001 27.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:21, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Tanks as subcategories of turret

Hello, I have seen that you included the tanks in the category of their turrets and guns (for instance Category:APX-R turret and Category:Hotchkiss H-35 tanks. I would rather disagree, since some versions of the tanks do not have turrets or guns. What are your reasons to categorize the way you did?--Le Petit Chat (talk) 08:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm sorry to be late. First, My mother tongue isn't English, I'm not good. If there is impoliteness, please permit.

the reasons to categorize the way I did,

• One, The users makes the picture easy to find.
• Two, It may be a little different case, some self-propelled artillery category have main-gun category as parent category,Equally, the mainstream models of Hotchkiss H-35/38/39 tanks and Renault R35 tanks have APX-R turret, so, I did.

I think,the user's advantage convenience, is most important, so I think the way to link between the categories by a different way (for example, cat see also) is also good.

P.S. I made japanese version of APX turret article, ja:APX砲塔, based on your french article, I'll be thankful.

best regards.--Brakeet (talk) 03:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for you answer. --Le Petit Chat (talk) 12:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:LRDG Chevrolet at IWM

Category:LRDG Chevrolet at IWM is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD C2 (unuseful empty category) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Palosirkka (talk) 10:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Goshohachimangu-kyoto-010.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Goshohachimangu-kyoto-010.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Andel (talk) 16:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)