User talk:Bheinskitang

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bheinskitang!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added the relevant text of the off-wiki thread on the talk page. I have also created a list of Commons:WikiProject Nature and conservation in India#To Do. This is FYI. Prashanthns (talk) 13:50, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Children in nature in India.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Roland zh (talk) 19:43, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exacum sp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 15:57, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chersonesia risa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 20:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terminalia tomentosa bark pattern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 19:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canarium resiniferum IMG 8161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 14:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coprinus sp Anamalai hills.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but can you identify the species? -- Ikan Kekek 10:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality, @ Ikan Kekek it is very difficult to identify the mushrooms (especially from Western Ghats, India due to lack of good quality field guides), hence I hope that it is ok to leave it to Genus level (Coprinus sp.)--PJeganathan 10:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment - I've asked for guidance about this issue on the talk page, but so far, no-one has responded to my query. -- Ikan Kekek 08:48, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My query has been addressed in terms of arthropoda. I'll take your point and promote this for good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:20, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this Ikan Kekek-PJeganathan 07:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Bheinskitang,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)