User talk:Bgag/Archives 2016-17

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Begonias on the Bosphorus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roseline A on the Bosphorus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of lions, Dolmabahçe Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sadirvan of the Süleymaniye Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domes of the Süleymaniye Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney Opera House 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal spoonbill, Kakadu National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:00, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sydney Harbour Bridge 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Lima - Sculpture 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good picture--Lmbuga 14:51, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle del Rastro de San Francisco, Lima.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Lima - Door knocker.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle de Mercaderes, Lima.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 17:52, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Trujillo, Peru 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Reserve Bank of Peru, Trujillo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trujillo Town Hall (Peru).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:07, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle del Mirador de Santa Clara, Trujillo, Peru.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:36, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque of the Central Reserve Bank of Peru, Trujillo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:51, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trujillo Town Hall (Peru) (exterior) NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freedom Monument, Trujillo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:12, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Trujillo, Peru - Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Trujillo, Peru - Bell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Archiepiscopal Palace of Trujillo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mausoleum of Roxelana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC) Good quality --Themidget17 06:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC) Reverted irrational sending to CR. Themidget17, do not add double support votes and sending to CR in the same moment. --Cccefalon 07:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Trujillo, Peru - Bell tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC) Good quality --Themidget17 06:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC) Reverted irrational sending to CR. Themidget17, do not add double support votes and sending to CR in the same moment. --Cccefalon 07:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auto rickshaw in Huanchaco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too bad that bucket for the vehicle, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huanchaco Beach Restaurant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough for a Q1photo, good composition --Michielverbeek 14:38, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reed boat in Huanchaco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:39, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huanchaco Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:39, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chan Chan - reliefs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 15:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe, Pacasmayo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chan Chan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pacasmayo Beach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Freedom Monument (Trujillo), Peru - South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Archiepiscopal Palace of Trujillo, Peru, exterior - South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sultan Süleyman Türbesi, Istanbul (exterior) East view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pacasmayo Beach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel La Estacion, Pacasmayo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pacasmayo Beach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pier of Pacasmayo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de Sitio Huaca Rajada - Sipán.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:47, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Lord of Sipán 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:47, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boats on Pacasmayo Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 15:37, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe, Pacasmayo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auto rickshaw in Sipán.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site of Huaca Rajada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! State flag of Peru, Túcume.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site of Túcume 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Site of Túcume 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de Sitio, Túcume.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumbas Reales de Sipán Museum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Augusto B. Leguía, Lambayeque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museo de Sitio Huaca Rajada - Sipán, Peru (exterior) North view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Motiur Rahman Oni (talk) 09:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tumbas Reales de Sipán Museum, Lambayeque, Peru (exterior) SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Motiur Rahman Oni (talk) 09:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Establecimiento de salud San Pablo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Catacaos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia San Juan Bautista, Catacaos 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia San Juan Bautista, Catacaos 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia San Juan Bautista, Catacaos - Statue of Jesus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia San Juan Bautista, Catacaos - Statue of Saint Andrew.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trash bin in Tumbes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC) Possibly, this image can sneak into the photo challenge "Mailboxes" --Cccefalon 06:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC) Witty gag, Uwe. --Johann Jaritz 06:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuenca, Ecuador 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia San Juan Bautista, Catacaos 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restaurant Vista Linda, Eucador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theobroma cacao fruit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de la Inmaculada Concepción, Cuenca 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de la Inmaculada Concepción, Cuenca 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santo Domingo, Cuenca 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Mariscal Sucre, Cuenca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street in Tumbes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santo Domingo, Cuenca 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de la Inmaculada Concepción, Cuenca 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia de Santo Domingo, Cuenca (Ecuador) (exterior) SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support While there are other good pictures, this one is the best in its scope. --Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 23:25, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of the Catedral de la Inmaculada Concepción.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Cuenca 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domes of the Catedral de la Immaculada Concepción.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:44, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woman in Cuenca, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:44, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Benigno Malo, Cuenca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galápagos Lava Lizard 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minarets of Hagia Sophia, Istanbul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:13, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shrunken head, Cuenca, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street in Cuenca, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:14, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catedral de la Inmaculada Concepción, Cuenca, Ecuador (exterior) South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

30 years ago

I was in Cuenca. It hasn´t changed so much... (as far as I can see from your pictures) --Hubertl 01:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minaret of Blue Mosque, Istanbul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feria de ganado, Biblián 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:21, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de la Inmaculada Concepción, Cuenca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:21, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minaret of the New Mosque, Istanbul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santo Domingo, Cuenca 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Llama in Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grilled pork, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingapirca 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:32, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingapirca, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:56, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingapirca 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingapirca 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 04:12, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingapirca 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingapirca 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. A little bit oversharpened. --XRay 06:28, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingapirca 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingapirca 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingapirca 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Alfonso, Cuenca 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 02:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Blas, Cuenca 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingapirca 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia de San Blas, Cuenca (Ecuador) (exterior) West view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:46, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Alfonso, Cuenca 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Blas, Cuenca 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Blas, Cuenca 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:49, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Blas, Cuenca 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cañari woman 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cañari woman 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the image is tilted CW. --XRay 11:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 15:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)  Support Thanks. OK now. --XRay 15:43, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cañari people 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:40, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agriculture in Ecuador 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 06:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petroecuador petrol station 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:33, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petroecuador petrol station 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 04:20, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cañari people 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice capture! --Michael Barera 04:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Pedro statue, Alausi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fire engine, Alausí.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Eloy Alfaro, Alausí.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buildings in Alausí.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gobierno autonomo descentralizado municipal del Canton Alausí.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Train station of Alausí 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Municipio Intercultural of Cañar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMHO, tilted CCW. --C messier 11:46, 27 March 2016 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 14:46, 27 March 2016 (UTC) Good quality. Ram-Man 16:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Train station of Alausí 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Train station of Alausí 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Train station of Alausí 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Train station of Alausí 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Train station of Alausí 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Balbanera 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Balbanera 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A week support, just good enough for Q1 I think --Michielverbeek 05:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of María Natividad de Balbanera, Cajabamba, Ecuador, exterior North view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hosteria La Andaluza 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:48, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimborazo 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Light halos here and there at the top, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 17:13, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Superbe photos Krazy Soviet (talk) 15:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! School in San Juan, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:06, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vicuña in Chimborazo Wildlife Reserve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vicuñas in Chimborazo Wildlife Reserve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laguna Limpiopungo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Nacional Cotopaxi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laguna Limpiopungo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza Grande sign, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cotopaxi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Sebastián de Benalcázar, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque of Sebastián de Benalcázar, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle de San Agustin, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Gangotena, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:08, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plazoleta Benalcázar sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de la Compañía de Jesus, Quito 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:46, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de la Compañía de Jesus, Quito 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza del Teatro, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houses in Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:47, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de la Compañía de Jesus, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle de las Siete Cruces, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flag of Quito, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of José Martí, Ecuador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gorgeous and very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convento de San Diego, Quito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Eugenio Espejo in San Pablo del Lago.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rooster in Otavalo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pig in Otavalo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pig in Otavalo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Poor pig. Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia San Luis, Otavalo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cow in Otavalo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 13:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City hall of Otavalo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia El Jordán, Otavalo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rooster in Otavalo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bundoran Golf Club 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bundoran Golf Club - 9th hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bundoran Golf Club 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narin & Portnoo Golf Club - 1st hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narin & Portnoo Golf Club - 10th hole sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:50, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bundoran Golf Club - 5th hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:18, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bundoran Golf Club 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be it's leaning out a bit. --XRay 04:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narin & Portnoo Golf Club 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:57, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narin & Portnoo Golf Club - 7th hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ballybunion Golf Club 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:17, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ballybunion Golf Club - 10th hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:14, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ballybunion Golf Club - 11th hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ballybunion Golf Club 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poulnabrone dolmen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poulnabrone dolmen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ballybunion Golf Club - Cashen Course.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ballybunion Golf Club - 7th hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poulnabrone dolmen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very smart composition. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Columba's Church of Ireland, Drumcliffe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Payne Stewart at Waterville Golf Links.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drumcliffe cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:38, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Mick O'Dwyer in Waterville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ballybunion Golf Club - 1st hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:31, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:Sansiantai Bridge

I looked at your contributions and noticed that you are naming "Category:Sansiantai Bridge". I was able to find information about "Sansiantai Bridge" by searching for it in Google. This result was also to be found by searching at [1], [2], [3], but not by searching at "Sansiantai Bridge". Would it be appropriate to change the category name?--Liji (talk) 17:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

I don't think so. Both appellations are correct. --Bgag (talk) 23:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

What is your proof that "Sansiantai Bridge" is the correct name? After some searching, I find no evidence to support the your statement about "Sansiantai Bridge". I have changed the way my search works once again, but couldn't find any sources for "三仙台大橋". So, I don't think you say that both appellations are correct.--Liji (talk) 08:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

I have no problem if you want to change the name of the category. --Bgag (talk) 14:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Can you tell me that why do you react so?--Liji (talk) 20:25, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! County Sligo Golf Club - 8th hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! County Sligo Golf Club - 7th hole 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! County Sligo Golf Club - 7th hole 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! County Sligo Golf Club clubhouse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! County Sligo Golf Club - 1st hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 04:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! County Sligo Golf Club clubhouse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:51, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cruz giant tortoise 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cruz giant tortoise 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:44, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cruz giant tortoise 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cruz giant tortoise 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galápagos sea lions 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galápagos sea lions 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cruz giant tortoises 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cruz giant tortoises 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:54, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chelonoidis vicina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chelonoidis vicina 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:37, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chelonoidis vicina 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chelonoidis vicina 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lava Heron, Santa Fe Island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galápagos sea lions, Santa Fe Island 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red rock crabs, Galápagos Islands.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:48, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cruz giant tortoises 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galápagos sea lion, Santa Fe Island 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galápagos sea lions, Santa Fe Island 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galápagos sea lions, Santa Fe Island 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galápagos sea lion, Santa Fe Island 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Fe Island 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opuntia echios, Santa Fe Island 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Fe Island 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opuntia echios, Santa Fe Island 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galápagos hawk 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:44, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galápagos hawks 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galápagos hawk 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:25, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galápagos hawk 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galápagos fur seal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galapagos land iguana 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:16, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galapagos land iguana 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. No doubt! --Hubertl 03:30, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swallow-tailed gulls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galapagos land iguana skull.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:10, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marine iguana 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marine iguana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:14, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swallow-tailed gull, South Plaza Island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:50, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue-footed booby 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Breast bird very white and little detail, but good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue-footed booby 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:34, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red rock crab, Galápagos Islands.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great blue heron, Galápagos Islands 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:51, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rayen Castle 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rayen Castle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rayen Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rayen Castle 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rayen Castle 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rayen Castle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rayen Castle, Iran NE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Orientation was already in the geo-location data. Martinvl (talk) 09:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

 Comment, this scope is too wide - it needs to include the view orientation. With complex and notable buildings such as this we need to allow for the possibility of further scopes to allow photos of other aspects and directions. This wide scope does not easily allow that flexibility. DeFacto (talk). 18:52, 1 December 2016 (UTC) Scope is good now. DeFacto (talk). 07:19, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

 Support I have checked this submission against all six VI criteria and am happy to support this proposal. For the record, I expanded the description slightly. Martinvl (talk) 09:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shrine of Remembrance, Melbourne - statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shrine of Remembrance - View of Melbourne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shrine of Remembrance, Melbourne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jameh Mosque, Kerman 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ganjali Khan Complex, Kerman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windcatcher at Ganjali Khan Complex, Kerman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Exhibition Building - Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Arch 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Arch 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 05:25, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Twelve Apostles (Victoria).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 05:28, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yarra River, Melbourne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ifrane lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Busy, but gets its point across --Daniel Case 03:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Kinkaku-ji 02.jpg

File:Kinkaku-ji 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Batholith (talk) 17:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)