User talk:Beeveevee

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Beeveevee!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 02:06, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

FYI, see User talk:Elcobbola#Beeveevee, for your seemingly "duckish" behavior, a form of sockpuppetry. Continued using Commons as a mere cloud storage is unacceptable, please read and comprehend fully COM:SPAM. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:40, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My Contributions upon a careful perusal thereof are all encyclopedic and not a single photo has been uploaded by me as SPAM or Webhosting;
Upon careful review of the history of JWilz12345 and its contributions and Fact Check, there has been a very long edit war, anger and clear enmity between this user and User:Judgefloro who was blocked a sockpuppet after having long posted template of Wikibreak due to COVID illness and personal reasons;
I work as an Official of the Philippine Government, and the last thing that I will do is to use Commons as SPAM and Webhosting; I was invited herein via email by some learned editors and even 2 administrators that they need photos of Philippines to fill in Wikipedia articles;
IN THE LIGHT OF THE FOREGOING, I certify and state that I am not a DUCK or SOCK of any and all those mentioned by JWilz12345 (from Pulilan, Bulacan barangays) and I will faithfully and legitimately follow all Commons rules with advise of some editors and 2 administrators, yours sincerely yours Beeveevee (talk) 03:15, 3 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

Your subcategories Category:Santa Monica–Lawton Bridge (Makati section) and Category:Santa Monica–Lawton Bridge (Pasig section) have been nominated for speedy deletion under the reason: "Redundant subcategory, attracts COM:SPAM / COM:WEBHOST-ing files by socks of Judgefloro (talk · contribs). All files moved to the parent category itself. The bridge does not need to be split into sections by city since both sections are just identical in bridge structure and appearance." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Monica Lawton Bridge Makati 20.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Monica–Lawton Bridge Makati section 49.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:04, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:14, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Beeveevee,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)