User talk:Bayreuth2009

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bayreuth2009!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Bayreuth2009!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Watermarks[edit]

Unfortunately, each image you uploaded yet is watermarked with a timestamp. Note that watermarked images are NOT welcome over here as the usage of watermarks is discouraged according to policy. -- Ies (talk) 10:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Bitte nicht ärgern, ich habe die Bilder auf den offiziellen Namen der Aktion umgeschaufelt. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 19:19, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 20:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Überschreiben bestehender Dateien / overwriting existing files[edit]

In case, you do not understand German, please let me know!
Hallo Bayreuth2009, Du hast mein Foto Schloss Fantaisie in Eckersdorf überschrieben, weil Du es Deiner Meinung nach optimieren wolltest. Das habe ich wieder rückgängig gemacht, weil dieses Foto als QI und VI ausgezeichnet ist. Laut https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Overwriting_existing_files#DO_NOT_overwrite dürfen solche Dateien nach Ihrer Auszeichnung nicht mehr verändert werden!
Ich bitte Dich, von mir in der Commons zur Verfügung gestellte Bilder grundsätzlich nicht zu überschreiben, sondern unter Deinem Benutzernamen neu hochzuladen. Das entspricht auch der offiziellen Empfehlung Commons:Overwriting_existing_files.
Ich würde mich freuen, wenn Du mir hier schreibst, was genau Du an meinem Foto verbessern wolltest. Das von Dir hochgeladene Bild war viel zu hell und kontrastreich, sodass die im Schatten liegende Nordseite des abgebildeten Gebäudes völlig unnatürlich wirkt. Bei der Beurteilung von Fotos ist ein richtig eingestelltes Display sehr wichtig. Hier findest du Tipps dazu: Commons:Quality_images_guidelines#Your_monitor. Gruß --J. Lunau (talk) 18:23, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Schloss Schleißheim 5.jpeg[edit]

Hallo, Bayreuth2009, schön, dass wir uns auf diesem Weg kennenlernen.

Du hast von File:Schloss Schleißheim 5.jpeg die Kategorie Oberschleißheim entfernt. Ich bin auch dafür, dass Kategorien eines Bildes sich hierarchisch wenig überlappen sollten, aber hier geht es darum, dass das Bild außer dem Neuen Schloss Schleissheim oben auch einen Teil des Ortes Schleissheim zeigt, der nichts mit den Schlössern zu tun hat. Das ist bei Luftaufnahmen nicht ungewöhnlich.

Ist aber für mich nicht weiter wichtig.

Gruß nach Franken (nehme ich an), Aisano (talk) 23:45, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merci! Te mulțumesc și pentru lauda amabila ta. -- Aisano (talk) 17:44, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danke![edit]

Hallo Bayreuth2009, höchste Zeit, dass ich mich mal bei dir bedanke für die Mühe, die du dir bei der Kategorisierung meiner Fotos machst. Ich muss zugeben, dass ich da selbst etwas sorgfältiger sein könnte, aber dass das viel Arbeit macht und Zeit erfordert, brauche ich dir nicht zu erzählen. Da verwende ich die Zeit lieber für neue Fotos. Herzliche Grüße --Rufus46 (talk) 14:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:München, Maffeistrasse (03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jespinos (talk) 21:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Bayreuth2009, könntest du bitte noch den Namen des Bildhauers der Beschreibung hinzufügen. Falls die Skulptur noch geschützt ist, ist das sogar rechtlich erforderlich. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Bayreuth2009, sind diese Säulen da dauerhaft aufgestellt oder nur vorübergehend im Rahmen einer Ausstellung? --Túrelio (talk) 07:56, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Die Säulen sind angeblich dauerhaft aufgestellt.

Bildbearbeitung[edit]

...besten Dank für die Verbesserungen der drei Bilder (St. Marien und St. Konrad Hof)! LG--Ἀστερίσκος (talk) 15:51, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Danke[edit]

für das Einordnen der Bilder in Freising.

-- Vuxi (talk) 19:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Maps_and_Coats_of_arms_in_Oberhaching has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Leyo 12:18, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Statue_of_Mariangelo_Accursio_(Uffizi_Gallery) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Arildto (talk) 13:42, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muenchen St Rupert Altar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Artmax (talk) 09:28, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Pittersdorf (18.09.08).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pittersdorf (18.09.08).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:08, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Regasterios (talk) 13:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]