User talk:Baxter9~commonswiki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Baxter9!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

recent revert of "Oil on canvas"[edit]

Hi, are you aware of any talk on this issue (collapsible templates) or was this just a kid, almost unable to read? (when looking at the revert×its_user_page, I rather think so ;[[). [w.] 07:14, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I only added the Hungarian form of it "Olaj, vászon" nothing else...Baxter9 (talk) 21:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed image[edit]

You removed this image today:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hng2 2.jpg, with a reason: "no licence". Unfortunately ALL of them has licence and they are in wiki commons! Please restore it, that image is very important in that article! THX! Here are the links to the images (to previous ones to):[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] Please responde on my talkpage.Baxter9 (talk) 19:25, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you'll need to make sure that a link to each of the original images is included in on the image page, so that others can check that everything is freely licensed. I'll undelete for 24 hours to give you time to do that. By the way, one of the links you left on my talk page was to a category not an image, and others were to Wikipedia pages. You may need to check them. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:14, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:The Slovak inhabitants of Békéscsaba, Hungary protest against the deportation of Hungarians from Czechoslovakia (1946).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Liliana-60 (talk) 03:26, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

German soldiers[edit]

Hello! I have a question about this picture. Are you sure that these soldiers are germans? Their uniform seems like the hungarian huszár's uniform, which were used in the first world war by them. --Szabi237 (talk) 21:37, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

19:59, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

02:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Budapest SPOT.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

vip (talk) 13:23, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]