User talk:BarnCas/Archives 2014

File:Teilhol TXA 325 Diesel 1990.jpg

File:Teilhol TXA 325 Diesel 1990.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Leoboudv (talk) 08:26, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Despite a CC-By licence for the Flickr file, the problem is this file is a scan of a French work, isn't it? I just saw it was not possible to add such a file in Commons, sorry.

Seems the UK law is different (Catalogue_Dodge_trucks_in_Britain.jpg)?

BarnCas (talk)

• Read the rest here (archive page from 11 May 2014 : this discussion was deleted by Leoboudv from his talk page as it was solved). BarnCas

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. -- Rillke^(q?) 10:54, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

@Rillke: Merci de cette confiance, je vais essayer de ne pas faire trop de bêtises / Thanks for your trust, I'll try not make a mess
BarnCas (talk) 11:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Pas de problème. / No point. :) -- Rillke^(q?) 11:17, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Cars

Hi BarnCas, I do not have much knowledge of cars, i looked up the data on the website of the Dutch car registration of the tax office. There it simply says what year the car was officially registered. So i leave it up to you to do what you think is best :)

Regards Alfvanbeem (talk) 10:26, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

@Alfvanbeem: answer to this answer at your home
BarnCas (talk)

Code issues in User:BarnCas/common.css

Hi BarnCas, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:BarnCas/common.css. Glad to see you coding in css! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 2 new prettyCss issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in css writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 9 char number 23 - Evidence: 5px
2. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 9 char number 44 - Evidence: 15px

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 02:47, 30 August 2014 (UTC).

I don't think some !important declarations for color or positioning in my private Css file will kill kittens nor break anything... Anyway, most of them are supposed to be temporary. So I'll use {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}}, indeed. Is there any documentation about this template?

(Yes, I dare talk to bots )
BarnCas (talk)

Category:Fileteado cartel colectivo chevrolet 1947

Hi BarnCas,

(Sorry for my bad english). The category that you create "Category:Fileteado cartel colectivo chevrolet 1947" has a very strange name. The fotograph are not of a "cartel", only one it has one. And the "fileteado" is not presented in all the images. And "fileteado cartel" is an incorrect gramatical sentence.

I thinḱ is an error to put all those photographs in an only category with this extavagant name. Please, try to improve that o reverse to the before mode.

Thnaks.

--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 13:16, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Olá Roberto Fiadone!
(I don't think my English is better, it is not my native language )
I just gave to the category the name that was used for 2 pictures. And as my translation tools didn't manage to translate it in a good way, I gave up trying to understand what these words mean. But I'm Ok to rename it, as I think it's important that all these pictures are gathered: for the moment there is only 2 Advance Design buses on Commons, and knowing how the bus looks like outside is as important as seeing how is it's interior.
Would the name Colectivo Chevrolet 1947 (Advance Design) be more accurate and less weird? The "Advance Design" is here to distinguish it from the AK Series Colectivo Chevrolet 1947.
Regards,
BarnCas (talk) 23:59, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Ok, That would be better.

Thanks,

--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 01:59, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

 Done: the 10 pictures have been moved to the new category. Thanks for your vigilance.
BarnCas (talk) 05:07, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

File:1964 chevy.png

Hello!
The fender emblem of the pickup in File:1964 chevy.png seems to be a 1966 one. Are you sure of the 1964 model year (which emblem looks like this one) you put in its name, or did you do it just because lot of people talk about the 1964-1966 model (due to the new windshield)?
Regards,
BarnCas (talk) 02:09, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

I just transfered it. I guess you'll have to ask en:User:Corporal clegg48 who took the photo. // Liftarn (talk)

@Liftarn: I think a single talk page is better to discuss, and preferably where it started. So my answer is at your home.
BarnCas (talk) 20:36, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

respuesta

bonjour tu as raison je m´ai confundu car le meme nome... j´ai resitué le fichier dans sa page suburban. je ne sais pas changer le nom de mon photo, pouvez-vous le faire?. merci pour son conseil et aide --Gonce (talk) 00:55, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

@Gonce: J'ai mis ma réponse à la suite de la conversation, sur ta page.
BarnCas (talk) 01:39, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Peugeot

Bonjour BarnCas. J'ai vu que tu as modifié certaines catégories de modèles Peugeot ce matin. Les modifications concernant la Peugeot 408 peuvent poser problème. Lorsque j'ai commencé à uploader les photos de 408 chinoises, j'avais pris soin à ajouter la catégorie "Dongfeng Peugeot vehicles" à chaque photo et non à la catégorie entière car ce modèle est aussi produit en Amérique du Sud et donc certaines photos ne sont pas concernées par cette catégorie. Le mieux ce serait de rajouter "Dongfeng Peugeot vehicles" sur chaque photo d'un modèle n'ayant aucune caractéristique spécifique au marché chinois (206, 508) et de créer une catégorie avec "Dongfeng Peugeot vehicles" pour ceux qui en possèdent une ou qui sont uniquement vendus sur ce marché (307 Cross, 3008 facelift). Dis-moi ce que tu en penses de ça. Bonnes fêtes Cordialement, Navigator84 Talk 12:40, 26 Décembre 2014 (UTC+1)

Bonjour Navigator84.
Je dois t'avouer que je ne suis pas super-fan des rubriques où plusieurs exemplaires d'un même véhicule qui pourraient être regroupés en sous-rubriques "traînent individuellement". D'où mon intervention . J'avoue cependant m'être un peu laissé entraîner pour ces 408, puisqu'à la base c'est un modèle de DPCA qui a été repris tel quel par d'autres usines, et que je me suis arrêté à cette idée...
Concernant ta proposition : ne serait-il pas plus "lisible" de sortir la 408 de Donfeng Peugeot vehicles, mais d'y inclure une sous-rubrique Peugeot 408 (China) qui elle serait reliée à Donfeng Peugeot vehicles? Comme ça cette dernière ne grossirait pas inutilement.
Cordialement
BarnCas (talk) 12:03, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour, le principe me parait bien mais si au final on se retrouve avec des rubriques 206 (Allemagne), 206 (France), 206 (Espagne) est ridicule à mon avis.

Pour la 408, il n'y a pas de soucis pour séparer celles produites par Dongfeng-Peugeot et celles produites en Amérique du Sud. Je vais faire de même pour le 3008. Par contre, il serait possible de supprimer "Dongfeng" dans la rubrique que tu as créé pour la 308 sedan ? Ou alors de créer une rubrique Peugeot 308 (China) avec une sous-rubrique 1ère génération qui incluera la 308 sedan et une autre pour la 2e génération qui incluera la future 308S qui sera lancée l'année prochaine ? Cordialement, Navigator84 Talk 11:22, 28 Décembre 2014

Avec 130 fichiers pour la 206, un minimum de catégorisation ne serait effectivement pas un mal pour s'y retrouver . Ceci dit, ladite catégorisation ne doit se faire que selon des critères marquants, et pour faciliter la recherche / navigation. "France", "Allemagne" et "Espagne", pour reprendre ton exemple, n'auraient aucune pertinence, puisque les voitures en question ont toutes été produites en France. Par contre, (China) et (Iran), du fait de marchés et de lieux de production différents, ont leur importance, selon moi.
Fais comme tu penses être le mieux pour ces Dongfeng / non-Dongfeng : je ne sais quand je pourrais me remettre à tout ça, et je dois t'avouer que les Peugeot ne sont pas au plus haut de ma liste des choses à faire. Partant du principe qu'on n'est jamais mieux servi que par soi-même, "help yourself", comme disent nos amis d'outre-Manche
Cordialement,
BarnCas (talk) 23:42, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour BarnCas. Merci de ton coup d'œil : j'ai demandé le renommage de la 306 en 106. Avec mes meilleurs vœux. --JLPC (talk) 10:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)