User talk:BZillaGorilla

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, BZillaGorilla!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 03:17, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Barona Casino Lakeside California.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Herby talk thyme 11:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not recreate deleted content[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  sicilianu  svenska  suomi  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  +/−
Your image or other content, File:Barona Casino Lakeside California.jpg, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

Herby talk thyme 07:59, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I reuploaded the content only after reediting the image to change the EXIF copyright data to indicate that I release it under the CCA-SA license. I am the creator of the content and copyright owner.

--BZillaGorilla (talk) 10:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)bZillaGorilla[reply]

I fully understand that Commons procedure can be a nuisance. Please understand that about 8,000 images are uploaded every day, of which about 2,000 are ultimately deleted, usually for copyright reasons. Several times each week we get a user who claims that he is the copyright holder, when, in fact, he is not, and has simply grabbed the image off the web. So, please think of this as Commons protecting Instinct Images, the copyright holder, against possible theft by User:BZillaGorilla, who could be Instinct Images or someone else completely unrelated. Without OTRS, we have no way of knowing which is true.
I know it is hard to have people question your words, but aside from 13 edits here and 12 on WP:EN, we know nothing about you. While most of our 25,000 monthly editors are honest contributors, several hundred are not, hence our caution.
If you word the OTRS license generally, "All images uploaded by User:BZillaGorilla from Instinct Images", this will be the last time you will be bothered by this issue on an upload. Once you have sent the OTRS message I would be happy to expedite the restoration. Harry Mitchell also volunteered to do it.
If you have questions, you may ask them at the Village Pump in any of 42 languages or on my talk page. I will also watch for questions here on your talk page for at least a week. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jim thank you for actually taking the time to explain it. I understand that it is designed to protect the copyright holder. When my first image was deleted I thought it was because I forgot to change the copyright statement in the Exif from "© Instinct Images - All Rights Reserved" (my normal copyright statement automatically added via action in Photoshop) to "© Instinct Images - Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License". I did a new edit and made sure the Exif was correct and uploaded the image only to have it deleted again. I'm not sure where someone thinks I stole the image the day it was shot only to upload it to wiki commons. Seems like common sense would indicate that I am the creator of the content as I affirmed when I uploaded it.

Anyway thank you for explaining that the OTRS license can be done just once and apply to future uploads and that the process can be expedited. When I was asked to send an OTRS email yesterday I read that the current backlog was 75 days and I decided it was too much hassle to deal with. I was under the assumption that I would have to send an email for EACH images I uploaded which obviously would be cumbersome to say the least!

I will send the OTRS license today. Thanks again for your help.

Other examples of my photography: http://www.panoramio.com/user/2184108

--BZillaGorilla (talk) 19:21, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Knowing that Commons can be a steep learning curve for beginners, we do try to be helpful.
As for the lack of common sense, again remember the 2,000 images a day that we delete. Ten Admins do 90% of that, so we all work fairly fast -- too fast to apply any common sense when a new user uploads a deleted image a second time. That's too bad -- I wish we could give better service to the community, but unless we can double the number of really active Admins, we're stuck with working as fast as we can to stay ahead of the avalanche.
I should add that Herbythyme, who left the {{Dont recreate}} above has been a great mentor to me, is also one of the ten busy Admins, and is one of the seven people on Commons trusted to be a Checkuser.

If I can answer any questions in the future, please drop a note on my talk page. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:08, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]