User talk:Aude/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

NHL email?[edit]

Hey, I read that you that the NHL replied to your email. Would you forward it to me, please? I'm just curious because I would like to know the specifics on what we can use and what we can't. Thank you.--THUGCHILDz 02:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In a nutshell, they would be okay with us using images on "Wikipedia only", but not agree to GFDL or other such license. There's really nothing more in their message than that.
Our position is that we don't accept such "Wikipedia only" conditions. They must agree for my images to be here under {{GFDL}} or other compatible license. I have explained all of this to them.
Thus, we can't use anything, unless for some other reason a particular trophy is clearly not copyrighted. I think the Stanley Cup is okay, because of its age. For the others, I think we should play it safe. Arguments like the trophies are "drinking vessels" and "salad bowls" are dubious, in my opinion. As for freedom of panorama, it's also very questionable. I still think there might be some legitimate, valid reason for keeping the images, but I don't know enough about the legal issues to make a case. So, the articles will simply not have images.
The NHL seems concerned about "commercial use" of the images, and giving up "rights" to the trophies. In reality, GFDL doesn't take away their intellectual property rights to the trophies, and I'm not 100% sure they understand that. GFDL would only apply to these particular images. I also suggested that our images could be made smaller (less suitable for commercial use) and possibly other concessions on our part. E-mailed back and forth a few times, but they were not interested in working out something suitable for both us and them. Oh well, still was worth asking. You might get different results if you asked about the Cricket images or other sports trophies. -Aude (talk | contribs) 05:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • As I mentioned in my recent post on COM:AN/A, the copyright notice on NHL.com currently reads, "the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks". Therefore, you might want to email them back and ask for a clarification. Remember that the original bowl is from the 19th century, but the current version with the five large bands attached at the bottom with championship rosters engraved on it was designed in the 1950s. Thanks. Zzyzx11 15:30, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know enough about trademarks to deal with this further, in e-mail exchanges with the NHL. I know we do have {{Trademark}} to put on image pages, which may be what's needed. I would like to deal with the other NHL trophies, getting them deleted first. Then figure out what to do with the Stanley Cup images from some admin more knowledgeable about the issues in this case with copyrights and trademarks. -Aude (talk | contribs) 05:19, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Exterior_cimborrio_catedral_vieja_Salamanca.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. MECUtalk 20:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader User:Niplos stated "Trabajo propio, libero todos los derechos (dominio público)", which is Spanish for, "Own work, I release all the rights (public domain)". -Aude (talk | contribs) 20:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand

This bot really needs to give folks a minute to find the right copyright tag. The one I wanted was not in the drop-down menu. -Aude (talk | contribs) 14:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Dear Administrator![edit]

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...
čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  +/−

Aude, congratulations! You now have the rights of administrator on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and Commons:Deletion requests), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net. You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references....
EugeneZelenko 14:24, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and thanks to everyone that expressed support. I'll take another look at those pages, the deletion request backlog during the weekend, and maybe process some of the more straightforward cases. -Aude (talk | contribs) 03:11, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on Adminship[edit]

Now it's time to start the job. :) Please go through these ones and delete them which I think all of them should be.--THUGCHILDz 05:31, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Image:Hhof hart.jpg
  2. Image:Hhof vezina.jpg
  3. Image:World Baseball Classic Trophy.jpg
  4. Image:Hhof connsmythe.jpg
  5. Image:Hhof lester pearson.jpg
  6. Image:Hhof masterton.jpg
  7. Image:Hhof maurice richard.jpg
  8. Image:Hhof prince of wales.jpg

Street map of New York City[edit]

Good day. I noticed you uploaded a street map in relation to the October 2006 plane rash in New York City: Image:Nyc-e72st plane crash map.png. I would like to know what program is available for creating maps so I can create a street map of New York City in SVG format, however. Just drop a message in my talk. Thanks. --Imdanumber1 14:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrator SVGs[edit]

Hi. I noticed that a lot of your SVGs were created in Illustrator, which adds a lot of binary junk to the SVG. 128.158.145.51 18:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nakagawa offshore[edit]

Hi, thank you for noticing me. How are you, Aude? It was nice to see you in Taipei, Wikichix lunch :) Keep good work, Cheers, --Aphaia 06:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Benny Morris[edit]

Hello,
Thank you for this photo of this famous historian.
Could you give more precisions about at what occasion it was taken (I assume a congress about Middle East Studies...) and when... ? Thank you ! 81.246.196.90 08:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See here -Aude (talk | contribs) 15:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image deletion warning Image:Itwiki Oval Lingotto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

--User:G.dallorto 02:51, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If possibe[edit]

If possible, i would like you to rename me from iordanis_athanasiadis to iordanis_777 due to personal reasons.Thank you in advance and have a ni9ce day!--Iordanis777listening 12:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any problems with your name change request. However, only Bureaucrats can handle name change requests. Please list your request on the Commons:Changing_username page, and they will help you. -Aude (talk | contribs) 07:18, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Toyota camry hybrid mfd-energy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

--ЭLСОВВОLД talk 19:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Toyota camry hybrid mfd-consumption.jpg. Regards, ЭLСОВВОLД talk 19:24, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

template translation[edit]

Hi, Aude! Would you be interested in help translate {{Author missing}} and {{Source missing}} to Arabic, like {{Description missing}} already is? Thanks in advance, Waldir talk 01:39, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, Meno25 already took care of it! :D Feel free to translate {{Source missing}} to Spanish though :) --Waldir talk 08:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright[edit]

Dear Aude,

I am currently researching possible images to reproduce in a book, entitled 'Energise', which we are are planning on publishing in the near future. I would be interested in using the image of Jared Diamond which you have uploaded onto wikipedia, yet would need information regarding the copyright status of the image and whether it would be possible to obtain a larger version of the image (at least 2MB)


Please contact me via email on intern@beautiful-books.co.uk if you are able and willing to help.


Many thanks

Hannah Simmons

Beautiful Books 36-8 Glasshouse Street London W1B 5DL

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Aude!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aude
I saw that you undeleted Plan-métro-Dorval.jpg. I tineyed this image and found out that some very similar images are out there in the web which are (I think) copyrighted. http://www.stcum.qc.ca/metro/mapmetro.htm ios just one of 18 known websides which displays that similar image (Not mentioned the wesides which may use exactly this image, but tineye isn't able to find it). If it's really the uploader's own work it is may just a derivative work of the existing one. However, experiency has shown me that such images usually are self-made screenshots where the uploader claims to have the copyright (which isn't true) or really self-made images, but just derivative works. It would help to have the text of the OTRS permission (maybe the text includes a webside or something like that). Please contact me in any way!
thx --D-Kuru (talk) 23:12, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at this image more, and think we need further confirmation via OTRS. The map appears on the STM website, so pending some more official permission, I have deleted it again. -Aude (talk | contribs) 03:34, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

trying to make the pictures real purty[edit]

Do you know if there's another free program other than Picasa that I can use to clean up images? I do the best I know how with Picasa, but sometimes the sky still looks bad. (ex: File:George J. Mueller Co. fire in 1925.jpg) Gracias. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 02:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Try using GIMP, which is similar to Adobe Photoshop, but is free and open source software. The "clone" [1] and "healing brush" [2] tool in GIMP is useful for cleaning up dust speckles. There are other features that can help with adjusting color balance, and other things. [3] -Aude (talk | contribs) 00:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rename category "DC World War I Memorial"[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:DC World War I Memorial has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  македонски  русский  українська  ತುಳು  ಕನ್ನಡ  ไทย  עברית  日本語  中文  +/−

Proposing to change to structure's proper name District of Columbia War MemorialEoghanacht talk 14:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning[edit]

Deutsch | Español

Dear Aude/Archive 2. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you

Deletion request[edit]

Sorry for not notifying for the deletion request. Point is rama deletes a lot of those images while I was doing the DR. I was not able to notify the uploader because I was not able to see it. - Zil (d) 07:39, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why interference Category:Gastronomy?[edit]

See also Why interference Category:Gastronomy? (Category:Gastronomy --> Category talk:Gastronomy)--Tom778 (talk) 10:27, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI[edit]

You uploaded File:Wailalshehri2.jpg and File:Wailalshehri2.jpg on October 10, 2008. I noticed that the talk pages for these two images were deleted today. I uploaded some of the images from the FBI most wanted list. And I must have come across these images when I did so... probably because I tried to upload the images again, but using a file name I dreamed up, and the upload daemon warned me they were duplicates.

Anyhow, I checked the delet log for the images. They were both deleted by an administrator on September 19, 2009. Identical deletion log entries: "no source, no author, likely copyvio". That is a funny deletion log entry, given the information you put in the upload log: "{{Information |Description=

English: This video includes footage of 9/11 hijacker, Wail al-Shehri, reading his last will and testament. This image is from a screenshot from the video.

|Source=Internet Archive - http://www.archive.org/details/invasion911_p"

This administrator has done some very interesting work. I have admired it, and told him so. But I am afraid it seems to me that he has a couple of blind spots, and exercises his administrator authority in an opaque and unaccountable manner on images on certain topics. One of those blind spots has been images related to the so called war on terror. He deletes images silently, on his sole judgment, and requests for an explanation have felt to me like pulling teeth.

Some other administrators have admonished him when some of those images have come up for deletion review, and they agreed that the images did not represent instances of images that were eligible for speedy deletion.

If you weren't an administrator yourself I would consider requesting a deletion review on these images.

October 2008 was over two years ago. Are you still confident that the most wanted list images qualify for public domain? I know some challengers have suggested that some of the most wanted images may have been taken by individuals who weren't federal employees, and were re-used by American security officials without regard to the intellectual property rights of the original photographers, and thus didn't qualify for PD status.

I'll acknowledge that some of the most wanted images might have complicated status. But I don't think I could agree that most of those would be open and shut cases suitable for speedy deletion.

Cordially Geo Swan (talk) 12:50, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We need your help at the Wikiproject medicine[edit]

Hello, On the behalf of the Wikiproject medicine at the en.wikipedia, I am inviting you to be a part of the discussion going on the project's talk page about Patient images, The discussion started after I obtained a permission to more than 23000 dermatology related images, and about 1500 radiology images. As some editors of the Wikiproject medicine have some concerns regarding the policy of using patient images on wikipedia, and regarding patient consents. And they believe that commons policy is not so clear regarding the subject. So since you are the experts please join us at this very important discussion -- MaenK.A.Talk 13:46, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Aa77unknowncalls.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aa77unknowncalls.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Aa77unknowncalls.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

malo (talk) 19:28, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Wtc7_sculpture.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning[edit]

Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear Aude/Archive 2. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Huib talk Abigor @ meta 08:07, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:World_Trade_Center_Ground_View_1999.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cezarika1 (talk) 08:19, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Washauto06_honda4.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Washauto06_honda4.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 11:30, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Washauto06_honda4.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Washauto06_honda4.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 14:48, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aude/Archive 2!

First of all, thank you for your contributions!

Is this file your own work? Are you the photographer/author of this file? If yes, please insert {{Own}} as source instead of nothing. This shows explicitly that this photograph is your own work.

Thanks in advance for your support. --High Contrast (talk) 14:56, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some admins read like machines - when the source is not in the source field, they cannot parse the information that is there for anybody to read, and tag as "no source". /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:00, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Kuiper doesn't obviously know that, according to COM:L#License information, if the uploader is the author, this should be stated explicitly. This was not done - I did that afterwards because I trust you, Aude. --15:07, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
This was stated explicitly, at upload. But even after I had reverted the tag, High Contrast could not see it... /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:35, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And who was the only one that was able to fix it finally? Yes, correct, not the kuiper kuy. I do not want Aude's talk page getting inundated by this stuff. Kuiper, please attack me on my talk page. --High Contrast (talk) 15:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]