User talk:Armenak Margarian/Archive/2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MarmashenMon1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Too dark. Can you lighten it up? PumpkinSky 22:10, 17 July 2017 (UTC) can you look now? I think it'is ok.--Armenak Margarian 09:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good now. PumpkinSky 12:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Gregory the Illuminator church in Arevik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please sign your nomination. --Palauenc05 17:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done sorry--Armenak Margarian 18:21, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support GQ --Palauenc05 21:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmashenshirak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Categorization should always be better -- Sixflashphoto 19:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done It's ok now.--Armenak Margarian 19:55, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 20:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Choruti vanq1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not bad, but one of your categories are broken -- Sixflashphoto 03:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)✓ Done it's ok now --Armenak Margarian 08:56, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed, and Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 13:47, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Sargis1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality. Bit of noise in the sky but still Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 03:54, 4 October 2017 (UTC) thank you --Armenak Margarian 08:56, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manus1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 08:49, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jrapichurch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Even in shadow the detail is there. Ok by me. -- Sixflashphoto 08:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagravanmem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs geotaging and much better categorization -- Sixflashphoto 23:53, 4 October 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done thank you --Armenak Margarian 08:59, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 20:18, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KhatchkarDsegh1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MayrHayastan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 10:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harich12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I might crop off the left-It's very soft and probably not fixable. Needs getoagged also. -- Sixflashphoto 20:29, 5 October 2017 (UTC)✓ Done Excusez-moi mais je ne suis pas très fort du conté technique, donc j'ai ajouté seulement les géo-données--Armenak Margarian 11:47, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 06:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SirunKhach3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The subject is in focus even if the trees are not but this would need gettagging -- Sixflashphoto 20:23, 5 October 2017 (UTC)✓ Done merci --Armenak Margarian 13:16, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 06:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MarmashenMonShirak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 15:55, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aygabac1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please no red linked categories and a better categorization. The filename should be better too. --XRay 19:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done i'm very sorry, now it's ok.--Armenak Margarian 20:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you. --XRay 18:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! School13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GusanagyughCastle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Had a bit sharper at the bottom. But okay for me--Famberhorst 14:37, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harichavanq2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Capricorn4049 00:01, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shiraz house museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 07:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmashen Monastery10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 17:33, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmashen5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sirun Khach2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EreruykAnipemza2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK.--Famberhorst 07:09, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hovhannes Shiraz1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 12:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hovhannes Shiraz2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 02:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Saviour Church Gyumri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 20:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frunzik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial 1988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avetik Isahakyan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khatchkar in Gyumri1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avetik Isahakyan1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:19, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Mermaid statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:21, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avetik Isahakyan statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hilarmont 13:45, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duduk teacher statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:21, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hovhannes Shiraz statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armen Tigraniyan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hovhannes Shiraz statue1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:35, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poloz Mukuch1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support--Ermell 20:29, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mushirba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Background a bit distracting but Good Quality IMO -- Sixflashphoto 00:31, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial earthquake 1988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:20, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ashot III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:23, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ashot III the Merciful.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drinking fontain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:39, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial Gyumri1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:16, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument in Gyumri1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment It looks like tilted CW. --XRay 16:52, 22 November 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done merci--Armenak Margarian 17:54, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment IMO it's not fixed. I've added a note. --XRay 06:47, 23 November 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you --Armenak Margarian 12:07, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support IMO OK now. Thank you. --XRay 17:23, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sayant-Nova1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:21, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aram Manukyan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A messy background. But the main subject is good for me.--Famberhorst 16:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aram Manukyan1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:30, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OPEN AIR EXPOSITION.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
* Comment Good quality, but the photo needs perspective correction. Can you correct this?--Famberhorst 18:08, 25 November 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you --Armenak Margarian 10:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:29, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andranik Ozanian1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ezarate 22:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garegin Nzhdeh2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andranik Ozanyan1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:09, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garegin Nzhdeh3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vardan Mamikonian1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:09, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagratunyats monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:35, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OPEN AIR EXPOSITION2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lighting could be better but OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:14, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khatchkar in Gyumri2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 21:39, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagratunyats Monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevkaretsi Sako.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:33, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Makhluto1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 03:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drastamat Kanayan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OPEN AIR EXPOSITION3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:00, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peto Poghosyan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shadow at the right side is too strong for me for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:44, 2 December 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you --Armenak Margarian 19:45, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This looking better --Michielverbeek 10:26, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OPEN AIR EXPOSITION5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catholicos Armenian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vardanаnts statues.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The image needs a perspective correction, otherwise IMO acceptable. --Basotxerri 15:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done can you review? Thank you for your good review --Armenak Margarian 20:20, 3 December 2017 (UTC) OK now. PumpkinSky 20:38, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! George V statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1988 Armenian earthquake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:14, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The May Uprising heros1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevkaretsi Sako1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WEAVER.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drastamat Kanayan1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 23:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vardan Mamikonian statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can you fix the slight perspective issue? otherwise good picture --Trougnouf 10:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done please can you review? --Armenak Margarian 05:34, 13 December 2017 (UTC) Thank you --Trougnouf 08:45, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Open air expo1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Open air expo3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Open aire expo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:40, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OPEN AIR EXPOSITION4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There are some slight CAs on several white or lit objects, could you try to remove them? Otherwise OK for me. --Basotxerri 19:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done merci beaucoup--Armenak Margarian 16:27, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Avec plaisir. Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:58, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Open air expo2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilted, see background Poco a poco 11:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done Poco please can you review? --Armenak Margarian 12:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think the new version looks off with the base block no longer aligned and the whole structure compressed (looking wider, especially obvious on the head). You should be able to fix the perspective without such distortion with some negative vertical lens shift and positive rotation.--Trougnouf 17:58, 21 December 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done thank you Trougnouf--Armenak Margarian 21:57, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
thank you Support--Trougnouf 22:01, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artyom Petrosyan1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]