User talk:ArildV/Archive 2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ArildV!

-- 14:09, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Real Life Barnstar
Bra jobbat med alla möten med GLAM-institutioner! Ainali (talk) 19:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tack!--ArildV (talk) 12:37, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Götiska tornet september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and very interesting.--Jebulon 17:18, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholms slottskyrka september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes.--Jebulon 17:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholm Palace - panorama september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 10:33, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Great image. I think you could propose it as featured picture, I will support it. Best regards, Yann (talk) 12:10, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
Thank you very much! I followed your advice, and have nominated. Best regards, --ArildV (talk) 21:24, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Styckekranen och torpedverkstaden september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, but please remove the dust spot (see the note). Jakubhal 09:41, 20 September 2011 (UTC) Thank you. I removed the dust spot and uploaded a new version.--ArildV 09:50, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. QI for me. Jakubhal 09:53, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hessensteinska palatset september 2011a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:49, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholms stadshus september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:49, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholm Palace Theatre September 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 06:10, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gamla riksarkivet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments O.K. for me -- MJJR 21:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Röda Sten september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Qi for me. --Jakubhal 15:42, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jonathan Lindström Göteborg Book Fair 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 11:10, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Packhusplatsen september 2011c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:12, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johan Theorin Göteborg Book Fair 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationalmuseum (east facade) september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palmhuset Göteborgs trädsgårdsförening september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please, provide better description and also geolocate. Thanks --Chmee2 17:14, 25 September 2011 (UTC)  Comment i added geolocation, thats wrong with the description? --ArildV 17:19, 25 September 2011 (UTC) Well, I think so that it has to be clear what is on the image and from where the image is. And I do not think, that all people will know where is Trädgårdsföreningens park --Chmee2 19:44, 25 September 2011 (UTC) We have categories; ->[[Palmhuset, Göteborg]] (Göteborg is the Swedish name for Gothenburg) ->[[Category:Trädgårdsföreningen, Göteborg]]->[[Category:Parks in Göteborg]]->, but never mind i add a wiki link to en:trädgårdsföreningen. Ok?--ArildV 19:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)Maybe could you crop out some useless grass in foreground ? Otherwise nice.--Jebulon 14:58, 1 October 2011 (UTC) Good point. I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 15:11, 1 October 2011 (UTC) Thank you. It looks fine to me, now. QI--Jebulon 16:38, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palmhuset2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please, provide better description and also geolocate. Thanks --Chmee2 17:14, 25 September 2011 (UTC) i have added geolocation already, thats wrong with the description?--ArildV 17:19, 25 September 2011 (UTC) That's a QI.--Jebulon 14:47, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feskekôrka september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 12:43, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotta Gröning Göteborg Book Fair 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Göteborgs domkyrka september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:04, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Interiör Göteborgs domkyrka september 2011a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Tampa september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice! --Ralf Roletschek 11:32, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Friis september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:54, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adelswärdska huset september 2011a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:54, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skånegatan och hotell Opalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some clockwise tilt - it's not much, but enough to make it look like the hotel's falling over. Mattbuck 02:54, 3 October 2011 (UTC)} Rotated -0,2--ArildV 12:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC) k, QI[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Direktörensens villa Trädgårdsföreningen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good QI--Jebulon 14:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sjöfartshuset from Skeppsholmsbron september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Achim Raschka 13:56, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jan Ainali Göteborg Book Fair 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit noisy but otherwise good. --Jovianeye 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuggen september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine. --Mattbuck 13:03, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear ArildV,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scandinavium september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skansbron september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice, also the shadows --Ralf Roletschek 12:49, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arkan Asaad Göteborg Book Fair 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:32, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cantor 1 september 2011e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice, I like the diagonal --Ralf Roletschek 00:08, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skeppsbron 8 september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI IMO --Vassil 17:11, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skulptur Röda sten september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, good lighting, and good composition for this kind of statue. --Vassil 19:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cantor 1 september 2011b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments no perfect but good. QI for me --Ralf Roletschek 10:10, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1962 Scania-Vabis Capitol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:07, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peter Wieselgren september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Göteborg centralstation west entrance september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think it meets the criteria.--MrPanyGoff 09:01, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Johan Theorin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stockholm City Hall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Drottningholm Palace, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Drottningholm Palace - panorama september 2011.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Drottningholm Palace - panorama september 2011.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norra Hammarbyhamnen June 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Not sure about the combo, element in the bottom left is either too close to the border or should be removed. Léna 01:05, 13 November 2011 (UTC) Maybe i should remove some water?--ArildV 01:31, 13 November 2011 (UTC)*  SupportThe composition is excellent and the image was not technically easy. --Archaeodontosaurus 06:53, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mindepartementet 2011b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strandvägen 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good and technical well done --Haneburger 08:31, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand hotel November 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sfu 21:20, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Series II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:48, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Korvkiosk Djurgården november 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sfu 21:24, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Basement of Dormition cathedral[edit]

Why did I keep the disturbing detail on the floor? In my opinion, this is a navigation detail. See the same face-mask here and there, getting to know the composition of the basement.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:41, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I understand! Impressive pictures. Regards--ArildV (talk) 22:46, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Land Rover Series II.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Väddö augusti 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:30, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svitzer Freja November 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:30, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strandvägen 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I find it OK for QI.--MrPanyGoff 13:23, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Harchies RN1dJPG.jpg[edit]

Hello Arild,

Thank you for your support. As for the File: Harchies RN1dJPG.jpg, I have other photographs of the same kind that you can already see in the gallery and links of this file. µ

Your remarks about the File: Hensies RN1cJPG.jpg is very relevant. I will also re-upload on the same file a picture that does not have this problem.

Best regards,

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 10:30, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Af Chapman November 2011.jpg[edit]

Hello Arild,

If you can correct the dust spot in the sky of the above mentioned file. I will promote it.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 15:12, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jean-Pol,
Thank you for pointing out the dust spot, I did not see it. I have uploaded a new version. Best regards, --ArildV (talk) 15:32, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hensies RN1cJPG.jpg[edit]

Hello Arild,

I have re-upload a new file (taking into account your remark). Can you check the image now.

Thank you in advance and best regards.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 09:26, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Best regards,--ArildV (talk) 09:51, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fersenska palatset November 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 11:00, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationalmuseum November 2011b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 11:41, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Af Chapman November 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 00:07, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tullgårdsskolan November 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It should be better without the boat on the right, but good for QI. --Vassil 21:57, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

60D or 7D[edit]

Hi, for your picture File:Canon EOS 1100D and Canon EF-S 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 IS.jpg, the buttons looks alike of the 60D. 7D ones are not exactly like that (got a 7D at home). PierreSelim (talk) 09:45, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you help! I have requested a new name. Regards --ArildV (talk) 09:51, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, regards --PierreSelim (talk) 10:30, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationalmuseum November 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Véronique PAGNIER 12:05, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Folksamhuset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:49, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Noise ?[edit]

Hello,

It's about this image, and about your review : Some noise, otherwise good (but did u really need IS0 800?). --ArildV . Thanks you for the positive review.

About the noise, I take this picture during a match of ice-hockey, indoor. Ice rink is a dark place and subjects of photographies move very quickly. I take the photography with : ISO 800, 300 mm, f/2,8 and t=1/400s. With a 300 mm, I can't have a better aperture than f/2,8. So, if I decrease ISO (ISO 800-> ISO 400), I reduce the speed. But for 300mm, and mobile subject, I can't take my photography with a speed < 1/(300 or 400) seconds. So, ISO 800 is the limit for this conditions. Ludo (talk) 16:07, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand everything. But just for this picture, you do not 1/400s because the goalie does not move. With less noise, you would have had an FP here. But I understand that you dont have time to change the settings for each image. Regards--ArildV (talk) 16:24, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not a Hockey photographer, however I do believe it's complicated to change the t parameters during a sport events to take one picture and then goes back to your usual settings. It is likely Ludo just seen the goalies alone, took the picture and went back to the action in really few seconds. Of course you should try to set the good speed for each pictures but really on the fields it's not that easy. PierreSelim (talk) 14:53, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katarinahissen November 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 11:36, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsvägen 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment I support if you tilt it slightly ccw Påminn mig på min diskussionsida.--V-wolf 06:08, 30 November 2011 (UTC)  Support --V-wolf 11:28, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilla Sickla November 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 19:55, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lumakranen november 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --kallerna 18:24, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Håkan Juholt Göteborg Book Fair 2011a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough for QI--Jebulon 15:41, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katarina kyrka september 2011 (interiör)b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jonathunder 22:14, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montane Birch forests in Torkilstöten (winter).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aleks G 17:35, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]