User talk:Aqwis/Archive1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. Finn Rindahl 18:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eller for å si det på norsk uten å bruke en mal, flott om du kan finne passende kategorier til bildene du har lastet opp. Vennlig hilsen Finn Rindahl 18:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergen roofs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

COM:FPC[edit]

Just wanted to let you know that I have made amendments to my image, you may wish to add further comments or reconsider your opposition. Benjamint 07:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[1] BTW: Welcome to commons.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kronstad Hovedgård.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

IRC cloak request[edit]

I am Aqwis on freenode and I would like the cloak wikimedia-commons/Aqwis. Thanks. --Aqwis 15:12, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Butterfly[edit]

Dear Aqwis, i nominated a new version of my Butterfly on COM:FPC and withdrawn the old nomination. Maybe you want to drop an eye on it again ? :-) Thanks Richard --Richard Bartz 11:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Haakon_VII_statue.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Haakon_VII_statue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kjetil r 13:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cairina moschata head norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

that Croatian church[edit]

I really liked it even though everything they said that was wrong with it was -- in addition to needing a rotation. I rotated it and also played with it (it is one of the type of good images to do this with).

Thanks for letting it be available. -- carol 02:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eagle Canyon edit.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Aqwis 11:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thanks for helping me with my FP candidate, Image:Eagle Canyon.JPG. I don't have much photo editing software (just the crap stuff that came with the digital camera), I knew someone would point out it needs to be cropped and corrected.... but thankfully you did it for me. Thanks again, and if you ever need me to return a favor just ask! --ErgoSum88 19:11, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on QIC[edit]

I noticed in your last nomination the --~~~~ was not replaced with a signature. Why is that? Do you have Javascript disabled? --Dschwen 19:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what caused it - I have JavaScript enabled in my browser, and even tried it in Internet Explorer in addition to Firefox. Seems there are still some bugs in the new parser code... --Aqwis 19:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to work fine here. Odd. --Aqwis 19:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, the signature bug only affects gallery tags. Could you please clear your browser cache and try again on COM:QIC? --Dschwen 19:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cleared my cache and it works fine now.[2] Thanks. --Aqwis 21:53, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CatWithOcularProsthetic.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Would it be possible to add information about the type of prosthetic? Arria Belli 16:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask the cat's owner for the type of prosthetic this week. Not sure if they know, though. --Aqwis 09:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:UlvikfjordMountainsPanorama.jpg , that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:UlvikfjordMountainsPanorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

-- Alvesgaspar 07:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Black genitalia.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Black genitalia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 18:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote: The answer: Wikimedia Commons isn't a "picture resource for illustrating articles in Wikipedia". --Aqwis 09:37, 23 May 2008 (UTC) Why is it then that pictures upløade on local Wikipedia projects in many cases are automatically moved to Wikimedia Commons in order to be avaialble to all projects? Thisi,n my opinion, places your above statement beside the reality. --Frode Inge Helland 11:47, 25 May 2008 (UTC).[reply]

I never said that Wikimedia Commons isn't used as an image repository for the Wikipedia projects, did I? However, this is only part of its purpose; Commons is also used by all the other Wikimedia projects, such as Wikinews, Wikibooks and so on. Also, keep in mind that the images on Commons need not be immediately useful for a project; it is enough that they may potentially be useful sometime in the future. In my opinion, there are very, very few pictures that do not meet this criteria, and Image:Lisa3.jpg is not one of them. --Aqwis 12:00, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Årstad.jpg[edit]

Geocoding on this image {{Location dec|37.803|-122.468}} shows the photograph in San Francisco (I found this out through Google Earth) :) You may wish to fix this. Bastique demandez 22:11, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

atl swan[edit]

i dont understand unnatural shadows, that is a un edited pic.

Image:SvartediketUlrikenIsdalen23Juni1.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:28, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FPC for fireworks photo[edit]

Hi Aqwis! You recently supported my image Reflections of Earth 9.jpg for promotion to Featured Picture status. I've since uploaded an edited version with less noise, so I'd appreciate it if you would look at the nomination again and submit another vote based upon the edit. Thanks! --bdesham ★ 21:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NorwegianScotsPineForest Os Hordaland.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:47, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Panorama of Bergen[edit]

I like the panorama you just put into QI, it is a part of Bergen I do not think that I saw and I will probably spend sometime locating it on that image from the early 1900s I worked on a while back. That is the thing I like about it most, btw -- proof that Bergen is not a pink city! -- carol (talk) 05:14, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EidsvågPanorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Decent image. Why the downsampling? --Dschwen 14:28, 27 August 2008 (UTC) In addition to what I wrote on the image page, I couldn't use the full height of the pictures due to me not using a tripod, which lead to some of the pictures being "too high up" and some being too "low". So I had to crop the resulting panorama, which lead to the bottom and top being cut off (not that there was a lot of interest there). --Aqwis 12:51, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PuigMayorAvión2.jpg[edit]

Hi Aqwis! I've seen your edited versions of some photographs. I'd like to ask you if you can do the same with one of my pictures, Image:PuigMayorAvión2.jpg. I nominated my picture to be a featured picture but the main problem was the low contrast. Could you please edit my photograph? Thank you very much, whether you make it or not. Colorado river edit.jpg (in main page today) looks incredible. If you finally decide to edit it, please let me know. Thanks again, Kadellar (talk) 11:09, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try, but it's rather difficult when I don't know how the colours are supposed to look like. Radically increasing the contrast in a picture never gives the correct colours. --Aqwis (talk) 13:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, don't worry. Xavigivax took the photo himself and improved it, now the picture is much better: Image:PuigMayorAvión2-edit.jpg. Do you think it follows the guidelines to be a FP? Kadellar (talk) 16:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the miscolouring (red-ish) to the right in the picture is kind of unfortunate. To be honest, I doubt it would succeed in becoming an FP, but it doesn't hurt to try. --Aqwis (talk) 17:13, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Composition tips?[edit]

Hello, you recently opposed my FPC stating poor composition. Can you please give some pointers in how to improve it in the future? Thanks Ainali (talk) 18:05, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was a close call for me whether to oppose or not, but I think the following would drastically improve the composition: 1) closer crop and 2) more like a front view instead of a profile. --Aqwis (talk) 22:30, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FyllingsdalenPano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nothing wrong with it's quality. --Massimo Catarinella 15:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BurnedStockfishWarehouse1.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:28, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank me later...[edit]

...for the reverse psychology, it seems to work ;-) --Dschwen (talk) 22:56, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

^^ --Aqwis (talk) 23:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great work[edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
I present to you this barnstar for your excellent work in regards to this image. A great piece of photography. I particularly enjoyed the composition and lighting. :) - Anonymous DissidentTalk 16:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot. :) --Aqwis (talk) 20:03, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Gamlehaugen1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Gamlehaugen1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Congratulations ! Benh (talk) 11:59, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FPC Fjord[edit]

Hallo, I've nominated an panorama of a fjord in Hordaland of yours for FP-status on Wikimedia Commons. I just wanted to let you know. Regards, Massimo --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 00:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OsteriaConCucinaDante-restaurant.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:12, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Whitby Abbey 1.jpg[edit]

Hi. Thanks for commenting on my photo. I've uploaded a less sharpened version; does that one meet with you approval? Thanks again. Mike Peel (talk) 10:48, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aqwis/Archive1&oldid=15364662"