User talk:Anibal Maysonet

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons:Deletion requests/Speedy deletion
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Anibal Maysonet!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:24, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anibal Maysonet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Exo22 (talk) 05:22, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Gabriela Peláez Echeverry.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gabriela Peláez Echeverry.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 19:45, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aviso de sabotaje[edit]

Hola, muy buenas. Actualmente estoy bloqueado en Wikipedia, considero que de forma totalmente injusta puesto que no incurrí en ninguna conducta prohibida ni dañina. En cualquier caso, ya intentaré defender mis derechos cuando toque, aunque no sé cómo ni cuándo. No pretendía comentar nada al margen de lo ya comentado, porque me temo que no tengo nada más que decir a día de hoy. Pero antes de desaparecer, me gustaría hacer un llamamiento ante algunas ediciones abusivas que he visto en algunos artículos de temática política y que podrían calificarse de sabotaje. Me refiero a las realizadas por el usuario Baprow, que lleva mucho tiempo imponiendo sus cuestionables métodos en forma y fondo. Si solo fuera lo primero, como el uso de colores arbitrarios en líneas temporales o empleo de abreviaturas de apellidos cuando no son necesarias en absoluto, ni siquiera me habría molestado en escribir este mensaje, pero he visto que en sus últimas ediciones ha llevado a cabo un verdadero boicot que suprime información útil y cierta. Hago referencia a artículos como Alcalde de Madrid, donde ha suprimido a Manuel Cobo como alcalde en diciembre de 2011 en la linea temporal, cuando fue alcalde en funciones a todos los efectos al igual que cada uno de los alcaldes reelegidos recientemente entre las elecciones y la constitución de sus ayuntamientos (o como Rajoy, Sánchez y Hormaechea fueron presidentes durante meses, o ahora lo ha sido De la Concha en las Islas Baleares y antes lo fueron Rollán en Madrid o Zarrías en Andalucía; de hecho, así aparecen en sus artículos y en las respectivas tablas en los artículos y anexos de presidentes). Ha ocurrido lo mismo en el Anexo:Alcaldes de Badalona con Aïda Llauradó. Solo quería comentar esto para ver si se puede poner orden y revertir ediciones totalmente inoportunas y arbitrarias, por el único bien del rigor en Wikipedia, y que hasta ahora se han mantenido porque nadie parece haberse dado cuenta. Muchas gracias por la atención y un saludo. HermanHn (talk) 07:50, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]