User talk:Amitie 10g/Archive/2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Revertiendo reversión

Hola Amite.

He revertido tu reversión ([1]). La carga de esta fotografía en Wikimedia Commons es una violación de copyright (como todas las cargas de Raquel Garrote, hasta la fecha, en el proyecto). La imagen debe ser borrada cuanto antes.

Quedo a tu disposición para cualquier duda. Un saludo. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 19:46, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Si es efectivamente Copyvio (con las pruebas aprotadas), sería recomendable dejar un comentario en el DR abierto por Ellin Beltz, o bien para pedir su cierre rápido. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:57, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Dailymotion logo.svg

Why do you nominate this file for speedy deletion? If you want to delete a version of the file, contact the COM:AN. Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

File:LG3D.jpg

File:LG3D.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leyo 08:19, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Reversion of my edits

Hi. I would like to enquire whether it is the modus operandi to revert edits and then to correct the license instead of correcting license at first and then removing the tag.123 -- samee  19:25, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your reverting

Hola Amitie, at Blendtec Logo 2014.svg you reverted my edits, but without telling any reason.
Many people, including you and me, try to make things in wikimedia better. When you revert somebody's edits, please give a reason, like "vandalism". In most cases a soft correction of the other's errors will be better than a total revert, which should be used more sparingly.
At the mentioned file, I diffused from the crowded category Created with Inkscape, and I used {{F}} which is an easy way to show the file name and the file itself. You did not tell whether you dislike the other versions or the other fields or something else.
Anyway, it would have been better to correct the missing categorization instead of reverting. Now I tried to find a fitting category - you are invited to find a better one. sarang♥사랑 05:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Traffic-lights-vector 9121.jpg

Hi, This is probably OK copyright-wise, but there is no license. If you remove a copyright warning, could you add a "no license" warning, or better, add a license and a source. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:18, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Viewtop.jpg

Hi Amitie 10g! I hope you are well. You recently updated the license on this file to {{free screenshot|Apache}}... I am having trouble finding evidence for that. The best I can find is this page, which has terms such as "You cannot modify the software...", which seems to be incompatible with compatible licenses including the Apache license. Can you point me to where the copyright holder licenses the software under the Apache license please? Thanks and best regards, Storkk (talk) 17:44, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Just FYI, I have nominated it here if you'd like to share your thoughts, there is also a similar DR here, which was started a few days ago. Storkk (talk) 09:35, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Non-sense Deletion requests

Regarding to your edit on my discussion-page once again: Perhaps it's unconstructive and "non-sense" for you to follow the German law, and there we have also the "Telemediengesetz" - but it's just your opinion! If there is no technical possibility to fullfill the German youth protection legislation, the files have to and will be deleted! So please stop spaming my userpage, otherwise I will report you! -- Uwe Martens (talk)

From Russia with Love

Hi Amitie 10g! Hey, I noticed your revert. Don't you think this logo is above TOO with all the shading? The red text consists of only simple shapes put together, definitely below any TOO. Not complaining, just asking for info. Thanks! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

isten baszameg

nem tudok egy kurva flájt feltölteni segics mán légyszives

J M Barrie

Hi, please amend your vote here, the description cannot be altered as the date is in the filename. Vladeraz (talk) 13:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion_requests/File:C1910_sir_james_m_barrie_author.jpg

Campaign Logos

Regarding Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard The user William S. Saturn is engaging in a personal vendetta against me. He is listing every campaign logo I've uploaded for deletion, when they clearly do not meet the threshold of originality. On Wikipedia, he has sought out articles I've contributed to to revert my work, even going to Wikiprojects I've revived to undo things there. He never directly notified me of his actions against my files, I pointed this out, he fills my talk page with 14+ deletion nominations, out of spite. I can't see any other reason why he's doing this. These logos are all (except one or two) obvious {{PD-textlogo}} qualifying, and the one or two which aren't still meet fair use. Spartan7W (talk) 19:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

It's at least somewhat unorthodox in my opinion to just copy others' comments as Spartan7W did to yours. Amitie 10g, if you agree with your comment appearing there, I'd suggest replacing your signature to it, so you appear in the page's history. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 09:43, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Revert the deletionsǃǃ

Amitie: please sorry!..., I want to revert the action to all files selected to be deleted. Please don´t do it!... Yes, they are good and precious files for the community. But I prefer to upload astronomy files in the future. Sincerely yours.200.112.168.68 23:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

What files? --Amitie 10g (talk) 06:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

These are all files that I select to delete, but don´t do itǃǃ https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fernando_de_Gorocica&action=edit&section=39 Fernando T. de Gorocica 10:51, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Bethlehem Steel logo.svg

File:Bethlehem Steel logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:40, 9 August 2015 (UTC)


Congratulations, Dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Amitie 10g, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons!    FDMS  4    22:15, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

fair use delete

Hi Amitie 10g, as you did remove[2] the {{Fair use delete}} template, which I had added to File:Advanced Markets Logo.JPG, I hope you are aware of the meaning of this template and, in case the DR is delete-closed, will move the file to :en's fair-use queue by yourself. --Túrelio (talk) 18:58, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Well, I converted the Speedy to DR because the logo seems below the TOO for me (notice that I wrote {{PD-Textlogo}}? in the DR). Could you explain in the DR why is the file is abobe the TOO (if actually)?. Anyway, a valid source is needed, but if the file is actually bellow the TOO, Fair use is irrelevant, as you as admin know. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
I didn't tag the file for speedy deletion. However, this logo has some creativity.
Anyway, your reply compels me to explain the rationale of the {{Fair use delete}} template. It has little to do with Commons, but all with re-use. It should be applied when images, which are in use on :en, are requested for deletion on Commons. This template starts a script which enters the image into the fair-use queue on :en and thereby can safe the image for :en. --Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Licencias

Hola, Amitie. He visto que has retirado una serie de plantillas de cc-by-2.0 por las clásicas de dominio público en unos grabados sobre madera de Gustave Doré (ejemplo). Desde luego que serían las procedentes en el caso de que la institución escaneadora de las imágenes no hubiera cedido explícitamente los derechos, pero como en Commons hacemos una "generalización/truquito" sucio (más conocido como the official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation) en el que consideramos invariablemente sin derechos de autor a toda imagen cuyo autor murió hace más de X años, existen algunos países, por ejemplo en el que fueron escaneadas, España, donde incluso estos escaneos están protegidos durante un periodo adicional de 25 años, con lo cual no sé si sería procedente mantener algún tipo de doble licencia, tendría que investigar, pero dejar constancia explícita de que la institución que los ha escaneado además los cede con licencia adecuada creo que no estaría mal... para que quien quiera "reusar" el contenido en un país que no sea Estados Unidos se sienta más... cómodo. Saludos... Strakhov (talk) 09:55, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Si que no son fotos tomadas desde lejos creo que está claro, pero la ley es ambigua, al menos en España, por ejemplo provides 25 years of copyright to "mere photographs" or similar reproductions (a saber qué puede entrar en eso de similar reproductions). Supongo que sí, que sería una cuestión para atar más de corto en el Village Pump. Desde luego que independientemente de lo que diga la ley española nosotros podemos (al menos) pasárnosla por el forro (es lo que hacemos), a la hora de subir las imágenes a los servidores de Commons. A la hora de que un lector use los escaneos... pues uno no sabe... siempre hay dudas... y si la institución ha tenido la gentileza de regalarnos esos dudosos derechos de escaneo con la condición de atribuirlos... se puede dar al reusador las dos opciones y que elija la que tenga a bien. Por otra parte, dado que puede haber grabadores de renombre escaso involucrados, aparte de Doré, que fue que hizo los dibujos en madera, con firmas casi imperceptibles, me parecería más procedente una de PD-80 o PD-70 (la vigente en Francia, el país donde se publicó, el mínimo exigido por tanto), pues es posible que alguno palmara después de 1915 pero harto improbable que lo hiciera después de 1935 o 1945). Saludos, Strakhov (talk) 16:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you, not only for the work but specifically for the kindness and for taking care of each image and document as it was very important to you personally. iopensa (talk) 10:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Removing deletion requests

Hi, I have noticed that you removed some deletion requests, i.e. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Philip of Edinburgh.jpg. This is clearly a copyright violation, so please do not remove warning. In other cases (i.e. old pictures), I agree that a proper DR is better than a speedy DR, but don't remove warnings if there is no proper license. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:49, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

please see this edit

[3] where uploader has changed information--Motopark (talk) 04:47, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Amitie_10g/Archive/2&oldid=200303593"