User talk:Amadvr

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Amadvr!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:46, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Telleri kabel.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Telleri kabel.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Amadvr, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jõesuu vaatetorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:52, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eesti Trükimuuseum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Somwhat grainy but OK to me. Interesting, nice mood. --Myrabella 06:22, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reomäe kiriku ikonostaas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 15:54, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reomäe kiriku ikonostaas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 15:54, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Amadvr, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jõesuu vaatetorn.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jõesuu vaatetorn.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Reomäe kiriku sisevaade.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reomäe kiriku sisevaade.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thank you for contributing your photos to Commons. I just adore this one! :) Ijon (talk) 08:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grünewaldtide kabel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:33, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karula rahvuspark 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rebasemõisa torn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:33, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rookse künnapuu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:33, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Väike Emajõgi, Märdi küla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sargvere park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:02, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lümati künnapuu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good, isegi FP minu jaoks. --Iifar 06:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiidu mänd siluett.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good! --Iifar 06:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hommik Mukri rabas.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hommik Mukri rabas.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Karula vaade.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Karula vaade.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaiu matkarada 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please remove the two blurry birds. --Cccefalon 06:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. Removed two angry birds from the scene. --Amadvr 21:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:55, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ahja tiik 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction --Cccefalon 05:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks. Added version with perspective correction, though I don't think this picture needs it. It doesn't get prettier with that and the composition is less pleasant. --Amadvr 21:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:55, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Esna mõis sisevaade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 13:46, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harimäe torn, vaade lõunasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colours --Óðinn 15:06, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mäe-Lehtsoo tamm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiikla mõisa tuuleveski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:14, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohusuu õigeusu kirik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Illuka mõisa park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohusuu luteri kirik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mäetaguse Rosenite kabel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mäetaguse Rosenite kabel sisevaade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 23:15, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiikla mõisa park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mäetaguse mõisa kasvuhoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:58, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mäetaguse mõisa ait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:58, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mäetaguse mõisa aednikumaja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:58, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mäetaguse mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:58, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sompa kaevanduse peahoone 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sompa kaevanduse peahoone detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sompa kaevanduse peahoone 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:54, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiikla mõisa peahoone tagant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 18:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiikla mõisa peahoone eest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 18:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiikla mõisa abihoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 18:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kukruse mõis tagantvaade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iisaku kalmistu kabel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iisaku kalmistu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very weak  Support Good quality. Description is very short and should be better. --XRay 16:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valgesoo matkarada 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luke park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Some parts may be a little bit oversaturated. --XRay 12:45, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norra allikajärv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Famberhorst 06:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ahja park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful, these nuances of green. Good quality. --Steindy 22:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pühajärve sõjatamm udus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poogandi järv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Marginal at full res but OK at 2 MP. --King of Hearts 03:13, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Järve rannamännid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:25, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pidula veskioja 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:25, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katri pank 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:14, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mustoja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:50, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teed Osmussaarel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok imo. --ArildV 12:05, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mustoja.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mustoja.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Hello from Armenia

Hello Janno Loide! How are you? Do you remember me, I am Vahag from Armenia and I have a good time in Estonia with you. We were in Edla national park. It is very good place. Come to Armenia. Here you can make many beautiful photos. --Gardmanahay (talk) 12:05, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tõstamaa kirik 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ridala kiriku altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ridala kiriku altari detail 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aegviidu siniallikad 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 15:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aegviidu siniallikad 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 15:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ridala kiriku altari detail 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 23:58, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Harimäe torn, vaade lõunasse.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Harimäe torn, vaade lõunasse.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Image without license

File:Aidi Vallik 2.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:34, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Aidi Vallik 2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Aidi Vallik 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

JuTa 06:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pähkla allikas.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pähkla allikas.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 3 August 2020 (UTC)