User talk:Allforrous/Archive 8

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Category discussion warning

Cannulated cow has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:45, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Tommy Rustad

It's already categorised in Category:Births in Oslo, a subcategory of Category:People of Oslo. Regards. Strakhov (talk) 15:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Mmedstereast and bulk catagorisation changes to DRG Class 44 etc. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:57, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

--Yann (talk) 10:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Question about a couple of categories

Hi, Allforrous. In September 2020, you created Category:American emigrants to Canada. Could you explain how this is different from Category:Immigrants to Canada from the United States? Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Indo-European gods has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 19:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Indo-European goddesses has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 19:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Reversion of removal of non-existent categories?

Hi, Allforrous. I removed Category:Disasters by cause from Category:Types of fire and Category:Disasters in buildings and structures from Category:Building fires because neither of those categories exist. Were you planning on creating them? Linking to non-existent categories does not seem helping to our users. — hike395 (talk) 17:37, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Cover of January 1901 McClures v/s McClures magazine in general

Hello. What is the reason that File:McCluresCoverJan1901.jpg this particular cover of McClure's Magazine should go into "Category:Muckrackers"? (As opposed to Category:McClure's Magazine in general for example?) Wondering, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:46, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello. McClure's (cover, January 1901) published many early muckraker articles. See: Muckraker. --Allforrous (talk) 01:53, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
That quote indicates that the magazine published many early muckraker articles, not that that one cover is a muckracker. My question remains; it seems to me that the "Muckrackers" category would be much more relevantly added to the category for the magazine rather than to that one particular cover. If you have a counter argument, please share, thanks. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:17, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
I agree with everything. Proceed with the discussion on the Wiki. Good luck. --Allforrous (talk) 11:16, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
OK, thanks I've moved the category from that individual image to the category for the magazine. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
File:PuntaLaralateral.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

191.126.129.204 02:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Question about a category

Hi, I noticed you created here on Commons a category named: "Cat:Public broadcasting in Canada" however, there's already a "Cat:Public broadcasting of Canada" and it's in-line with the naming convention similar to other article(s) under the parent category (Cat:Public broadcasting by country ). Were you planning to create a separate category which showcases for example any/all public broadcasters in Canada *regardless* of their origins or do you think we could make the in-Canada a redirect to of-Canada? I just wanted to reach out to you first in case you had something special in mind. P.S. I am watching your talk page so if you want you can just respond here and I'll see it too. CaribDigita (talk) 17:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Buried rupture earthquakes

Good day. I'm not sure about your adding Category:Buried rupture earthquakes that are already within categories for specific earthquakes. Per en:w:Buried rupture earthquake, "Examples are the Loma Prieta earthquake, Northridge earthquake, and the Noto Hanto earthquake", so it would seem that the category "Buried rupture earthquakes" should be added to the categories for those earthquakes, rather than just a few individual image of those earthquakes. Or am I missing something? Wondering -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:50, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I agree, correct everything please. Thank you. Allforrous (talk) 00:54, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Hall of Fame for Great Americans inductees has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 06:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Categories of footballers

I need your help please. I am asking you if you can find any footballers categories from Argentina that I believe you created and placed on the following:

Timmy96 (talk) 13:38, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Scenery by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


RZuo (talk) 08:29, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Cordoba category

Hello, Allforrous. You have new messages at Fma12's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Reversion

Why did you revert this edit?

What's the point of a category being in categories that don't exist? Swam pl (talk) 16:52, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Please do not delete the corresponding categories. --Allforrous (talk) 16:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
I've deleted them because they didn't exist. I see that you have now created them so I guess it's OK now. Could you also create categories that don't exist in the categories you just made? Swam pl (talk) 17:08, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
It's very wrong what you do. You should delete only the wrong categories. --Allforrous (talk) 17:54, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Ok but why should a category be in categories that don't exist? Swam pl (talk) 17:58, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
If you want to be an editor you must edit. If you want to find out you should consult the categories on Wikipedia. --Allforrous (talk) 18:17, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
I've checked Commons:Categories and haven't found anything about removing categories only if they are wrong (if that's what you were referring to in consulting the categories on Wikipedia). --Swam pl (talk) 19:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Rollback misuse

Hello, Please don't misuse rollback like you did here otherwise you could have it removed. The images were readded back to that cat so I could easily add the bus company name back but had forgot to remove them again,
I have a talkpage and you have an edit summary box - Politeness goes a long way. –Davey2010Talk 17:26, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello. You should observe the correct ways of erasing, without erroneous legends.
Allforrous (talk) 17:33, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Nothing incorrect about it - A rationale is more helpful than just "empty page". I've done this way for 10 years and no admins ever complained. –Davey2010Talk 17:39, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Plagiarists

Hello Allforrous, since you edited this, I was wondering if a Category:Plagiarists would make sense, like there is also the Category:Thieves to which it could be added. Thank you so much for your time. Lotje (talk) 14:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court justices has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Robby (talk) 08:35, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Category:Cradle of civilization

hi! currently your cat tree has some problem, e.g. History of the Mediterranean -> Cradle of civilization -> China. RZuo (talk) 17:56, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

See: Cradle of civilization. --Allforrous (talk) 18:41, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
what do you mean? it's ridiculous to have china as a descendant cat of History of the Mediterranean! RZuo (talk) 18:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
The theme is Cradle of Civilization, of which China and Peru are a part. --Allforrous (talk) 23:08, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Your differences with Wikipedia should be raised on Wikipedia. --Allforrous (talk) 23:11, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. For edit war on Category:Peru.

RZuo (talk) 15:52, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Category:Henfil

Hello.

There really was no need for you to create articles on commons regarding AIDS deaths by country. There is already a category page dedicated to those who died from AIDS and Category:Henfil is best suited for this category.

20SS00 (talk) 17:41, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Do not delete the categories in red, without explaining reasons. You should create the red categories, not delete them. ~~~~ Allforrous (talk) 23:10, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Category:Cradle_of_civilization has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


RZuo (talk) 11:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Ox-drawn cats

Hello Allfourous, while sorting out gauchos by country, I added a folder Category:Gaucho carts. This cat name looks OK to me, for practical use, but do you know any official Argentinian name and probably other (Portugese) local names of these carts? It would be nice to have this type of carts with their proper local names, in the intro line of the Category. One image just says "Argentinian ox cart" or something like that. At least this could be translated in Spanish. I'm looking for the correct Spanish and Portugese names for an ox-drawn covered cart (from Argentina), Not a wagon (not four wheels), not an urban horse-drawn carriage either.
Also I would like to ask if you have a suggestion for a good category name for the latin variant of western-style riding as used by gauchos and Huasos in the pampas, (not equal to European (Spanish) classical dressage). Could this possibly be Cat:"Latin westen-style riding"? Or: Latin-style working equitation? Or just use 'working equitation (by country)'
In this cat we can join several South American names for these cattle herders. Thank you. Peli (talk) 13:05, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Off topic

Thanks for your "thanks" and congrats for the World Cup (my team won bronze). :) --Orijentolog (talk) 01:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you because your words move me very much. I feel happy to belong to the Wiki project and have colleagues like you. Allforrous (talk) 17:20, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Accuracy and precision has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 02:12, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Progress (history) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 02:20, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Life sciences has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 03:35, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

17th century in Tunisia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Robby (talk) 01:28, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

18th century in Tunisia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Robby (talk) 01:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)