User talk:Allforrous/Archive 10
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
Category:Common_names has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 04:34, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Macroeconomics_and_monetary_economics has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 04:43, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Discussion notice
COM:AN/U
JopkeB (talk) 06:47, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Category:Parts of a day category move discussion
Back in July 2022 you edited this category. I would like to move it to the usual English term. Do you have any strong opinions that you can share in the discussion? -- DanielPenfield (talk) 14:51, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Scheduled Tribes of India has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 18:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Please do not use this category, which should be deleted, after being emptied. If a person deserves a picture on Commons, then create a category for this person, with a Wikidata entry. If the person if not notable enough to have a separate category, then the picture probably shouldn't be on Commons (with a few exceptions). Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:05, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
File:ਸਰਬਜੀਤ ਸਿੰਘ.png: In addition, if the person is unknown, he can't be a celebrity. Yann (talk) 21:08, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. There is also another [[: Category:Figures]] to review Thanks. Allforrous (talk) 22:33, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- In that specific case, separate the word Category:PublicFigure to Category:Public Figure, and redirect to Category:Celebrities.
- Right. I removed or deleted the misplaced files. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:12, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Categorization
I notice at [1] that you added a category that doesn't exist. I presume you are planning to create it somewhere under Category:History of Native Americans in the United States. Is this something you are doing specifically for Oregon, or are you planning a Category:History of Native Americans by state, or what? Also, why isn't the new category Category:History of Native Americans in Oregon, which would be worded more parallel to the existing category? - Jmabel ! talk 01:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Also, really, though, why should an ethnic group be under a "history" category? - Jmabel ! talk 01:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Drug brand names has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
186.173.52.34 12:18, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Deeds of Aphrodite has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Auntof6 (talk) 07:38, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Asclepius in mythology has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Auntof6 (talk) 07:39, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Deeds of Artemis has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Auntof6 (talk) 08:05, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Dionysus in mythology has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Auntof6 (talk) 08:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Deeds of Zeus has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Auntof6 (talk) 20:58, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Deeds of <mythological character>; <Mythological character> in mythology
Could you please explain what your intent is in these categories? The things in the deeds categories are mostly not deeds, but mythological characters. The "in mythology" categories seem superfluous because everything about the character is mythological. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Please use sub-categories
I noticed that practive for the files in category Category:Hermes and Battus. Ruthven (msg) 06:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Retail store elements has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 05:19, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Free content has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 07:22, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Multiplayer null modem games has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Alfa-ketosav (talk) 08:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Problem behavior has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
186.174.249.153 16:09, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Please create categories if you are adding them to images
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Probably_George_Vancouver_from_NPG.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=803244186 - Jmabel ! talk 00:56, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you Allforrous (talk) 01:00, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Avril Lavigne songs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
El Grafo (talk) 13:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Would you please explain your intent at Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/09/Category:Avril Lavigne songs? This category and its contents are so wrong that I'm really close to reporting this as an administrative issue. - Jmabel ! talk 17:43, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- The user. El Grafo accuses me of copyright infringement. That is false. Allforrous (talk) 21:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- My issue has nothing to do with copyright infringement. You created a category and filled it with a bunch of images that have nothing to do with the ostensible category. - Jmabel ! talk 23:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- See here for my reply – please proceed there. El Grafo (talk) 11:36, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- The user. El Grafo accuses me of copyright infringement. That is false. Allforrous (talk) 21:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Technology assessments has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 02:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Economics of the arts and literature has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Josh (talk) 19:40, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Economy by field has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 04:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Time in life has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 03:22, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello Allforrous, since you added some categories, I was wondering if a Category:Docudrama would make sense. thank you so much for your time. Lotje (talk) 04:53, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- See [[:Category:Docudrama films]] Allforrous (talk) 15:47, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 | Category:Joseph Alter is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Doclys👨⚕️👩⚕️ 🩺 • 💉 06:35, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Oct 30 categories added but not created
- 22:04, 30 October 2023 diff hist +26 m File:Jung-Min Lee.jpg added Category:Jung-Min Lee current rollback: 1 editthank Tag: HotCat
- 22:03, 30 October 2023 diff hist +28 m File:Karen M. Frank.jpg added Category:Karen M. Frank current rollback: 1 editthank Tag: HotCat
- 22:01, 30 October 2023 diff hist +40 m File:Kathleen Kelly.png added Category:Kathleen Kelly (biologist) current rollback: 1 editthank Tag: HotCat
- 22:01, 30 October 2023 diff hist +28 m File:Kathrin Muegge 1.jpg added Category:Kathrin Muegge current rollback: 1 editthank Tag: HotCat
- 22:00, 30 October 2023 diff hist +33 m File:Li Yang.jpg added Category:Li Yang (biologist) current rollback: 1 editthank Tag: HotCat
- 21:59, 30 October 2023 diff hist +34 m File:Lydia Villa-Komaroff.jpg added Category:Lydia Villa-Komaroff current rollback: 2 editsthank Tag: HotCat
You added categories to these files, but didn't actually create the categories. --GRuban (talk) 16:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you Allforrous (talk) 16:32, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Timeline of the Gwangmu Reform has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
RZuo (talk) 09:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi there. Saw that you created this category redirect today, and I'm wondering if Category:RCS thrusters should be redirected to it instead. Would match better with the Wikidata item and various WP articles better. Thoughts? — Huntster (t @ c) 03:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- Just a comment that might be relevant. On all Harrier aircraft variants, the whole section of flight controls that involved use of engine bleed air for stability was officially titled the reaction control system. That included the four chain-driven main thruster nozzles plus the four vernier thrusters (erroneously described as "puffers") at nose, tail and wingtip locations. See also Thrust vectoring at en:wp.PeterWD (talk) 09:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Retailing in the United States has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |