User talk:Alimujtaba79

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Alimujtaba79!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:18, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


WLMP Winner

[edit]

Please contact WLMP 2014 on contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk with your full name and address so that your Wikipedia merchandise can be sent to you. Rzafar (talk) 13:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have mailed you my address details. Thank you! Alimujtaba79 (talk)

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Photographer's Barnstar
Thank you so much for your great photographs. Please accept this barnstar as a small token of my appreciation. Photographers like you are a huge reason why Wikimedia Commons is such an awesome image repository. Thanks again Saqib (talk) 23:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib: I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude for your kind gesture. It is indeed a great privilege to be a contributor on Wikimedia Commons. Thank you and best regards. Ali Mujtaba (talk) 10:51, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ALI MUJTABA WLM2015 GOLRA DSC 1675 m.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ALI MUJTABA WLM2015 GOLRA DSC 1711 m.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. But: Your copyright hint is very disturbing. Please check your description and EXIF data. Your licence is CC BY-SA and the EXIF data says "This image is copyrighted to Ali Mujtaba hence it may not be used, reproduced, altered and/or distributed through any channel/medium without prior express writtern permission from the author.". It's contradictory. Wikimedia Commons is a place of free licences without restrictions like your's. And please improve the categorization. --XRay 10:34, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ALI MUJTABA WLM2015 FAISAL MOSQUE DSC 1542 m.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --A.Savin 19:54, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ali Mujtaba WLM2015 FAISAL MOSQUE m 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please apply full undistortion. At this distance, we expect rectilinear minarets. --Cccefalon 16:36, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Tried my level best. If it still fails to meet the QI standards, I'll withdraw it. Thanks for pointing out the flaw.--Alimujtaba79
 Comment Please sign your note.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:42, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good for QI. Thanks for following up. --Cccefalon Thanks for the promotion. I appreciate it. --Alimujtaba79 14:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Categorisation

[edit]

Hello and thank you for your high-quality pictures. Just a small note however: I recommend you to read Commons:Categories#Principles and specifically the "modularity principle": place images in the most specific category possible. Let's take one of your images as an example. You categorised the image in both Category:Pakistan and Category:Islamabad, but since Islamabad is always in Pakistan, Category:Pakistan is redundant here. In fact, the aforementioned image is most properly categorised in Category:Shah Faisal Mosque at night, which means that Cultural heritage monuments in Pakistan, Architecture, Islam, Pakistan, Islamabad, Mosque, Mosques as parent categories of "Category:Shah Faisal Mosque at night" are all redundant. If you would like to know what I mean by all this, please check the correction I made. --HyperGaruda (talk) 06:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ali Mujtaba WLM2021 FAISAL MOSQUE 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 18:32, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

[edit]
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Alimujtaba79,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Ali Mujtaba gilgit 00789 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zenwort (talk) 08:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Enyavar (talk) 14:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]