User talk:Alexander-93/Archive 3

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrari 488 Pista Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lexus LF-1 Back Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 20:11, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lexus UX 250h Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:00, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toyota Aygo Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 20:12, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rupert Stadler (Audi).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
ATS GT (2017).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support This is the best in scope now Voltmetro 15:17, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:28, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW i8 Roadster Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 14:12, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Super Levêque 1911 Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 22:03, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Skoda Fabia FL Back Genf 2018.jpg

Täusche ich mich, oder fehlt da am unteren Rand ein Streifen des Fotos (Hochladeprobleme)? Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 20:40, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Hey, tatsächlich, ist mir bislang nicht aufgefallen, vielen Dank für den Hinweis, werde die Datei verbessert hochladen.--Alexander-93 (talk) 20:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

:-) --Rosenzweig τ 21:31, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porsche 959 S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:49, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David Brown Mini Remastered Genf 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 15:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Your recent images

Hi Alexander, you seem to have enjoyed your trip in the States. Your recent photos you add in several articles have been reverted. Reason IMO is as much as they are stylish shots but the way you photographed them is too low to the ground (presumed you took them while crouching) it doesn't really represent what the car is. My advice is take them from a three-quarters view at a standing postilion. They will stand out more. --Vauxford (talk) 13:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for your feedback, I will consider your tips for further images.--Alexander-93 (talk) 14:56, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

@Alexander-93: For example, like this. Depends if there cars in between or not.

Example

--Vauxford (talk) 16:51, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buick Enclave (C1XX) - rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope –IagoQnsi (talk) 21:51, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Carlos Tavares 4 Genf 2018.jpg

File:Carlos Tavares 4 Genf 2018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 03:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

User Alexander Migl - USA Roadtrip 2018 - Lake Mead

User Alexander Migl - USA Roadtrip 2018 - Lake Mead is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD G2 (unused and implausible, or broken redirect) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

4nn1l2 (talk) 01:28, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Very nice pictures. Thanks for sharing. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:48, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Ford_Focus_(4th_generation)

Category:Ford_Focus_(4th_generation) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

–Davey2010^Talk 22:35, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aermacci 350 Ala d'oro (1965) 1X7A7902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Woodill Wildfire, left side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment scope may be Category:Woodill Wildfire, left side view I think Ezarateesteban 01:12, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Support - Useful, but the poor condition of the car gives me serious pause and I would really like a second opinion. Ezarate, what do you think? Does the photo merit the VI designation? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:19, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral unique photo in this scope but not good conditions of the car Ezarateesteban 11:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment On the show there was written, that this is 1 of 7 cars in the world. I don't know, when we will get an image of another car.--Alexander-93 (talk) 17:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Irmscher Inspiro 1X7A8062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:36, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Irmscher Inspiro 1X7A8061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ugly car but good picture -- Spurzem 19:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Irmscher Inspiro, left front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:55, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Irmscher Inspiro, left rear view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peugeot Type 174.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porsche 9PA Cayenne S Hybrid Concept.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porsche 987 Boxster E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porsche 911 GT1 '98 (street version).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porsche 356 No. 1 Roadster in the Porsche-Museum (2009).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Is the location needed in scope? Charles (talk) 09:49, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aston Martin DBS Superleggera Filderstadt 1Y7A4897.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:18, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Audi Q2 1Y7A4911.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:07, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Audi Q3 1Y7A4914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:20, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lexus CT 200h Filderstadt 1Y7A4909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:57, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renault Kadjar Filderstadt 1Y7A4842.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 March 2019 (UTC)