User talk:Alexander-93/Archive 1

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Audi A8 D5 IMG 0066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 06:53, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Honda Civic Type R Customer Racing Study IMG 0298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renault Alaskan IMG 0912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Audi RS5 Coupe IMG 0728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I'd have gone for a bit more DOF, but this passes my QI bar. --Crisco 1492 11:01, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpina B4 S Bi-Turbo Cabrio Back IMG 0826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 04:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toyota Yaris GRMN IMG 0856.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:02, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward BXi7 IMG 0895.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sandro Halank 16:04, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vision Mercedes-Maybach 6 Cabriolet Cockpit IMG 0586.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Fine. --Palauenc05 21:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chery Tiggo 7 Back IMG 0391.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Wikijunkie 22:41, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 959 Rothmans IMG 0677.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Wikijunkie 12:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Honda Jazz, Facelift, Back IMG 0311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Wikijunkie 12:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mini John Cooper Works GP Concept Tankdeckel IMG 0866.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. User category should be hidden. --XRay 16:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster Back IMG 0717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But minor CAs, DoF could be better, user category should be hidden. --XRay 16:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
AeroMobil (roadable aircraft) 4.0, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
  • @Archaeodontosaurus:  Done.--Alexander-93 (talk) 09:39, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:50, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 09:51, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Honda Civic Type R (2017) Customer Racing Study - rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
  • @Archaeodontosaurus:  Done.--Alexander-93 (talk) 09:41, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:52, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 09:52, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thunder Power SUV - front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
  • @Archaeodontosaurus:  Done.--Alexander-93 (talk) 09:41, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:53, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:55, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chery Tiggo Coupe Concept - rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
  • @Archaeodontosaurus:  Done.--Alexander-93 (talk) 09:40, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 10:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:47, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ferrari Logo IAA 2017 IMG 0794.jpg

Yours sincerely, Discasto _talk 21:07, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
BMW Concept 8 Series at IAA 2017 - front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:28, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:27, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Citroën C-Elysée WTCC 2013 show car.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Infiniti Q30 Concept - front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lexus LF-NX - front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lexus LF-NX - rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kia Niro Concept (2013).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Rather too many nominations I'm afraid. You might consider a limit of three per day please. 17:36, 13 February 2018 (UTC) Charles (talk) 15:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, I didn't know about this limit. How can I delete some nominations? Just by taking them out of the candidate list?--Alexander-93 (talk) 15:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
    • There isn't a formal limit, but it is a matter of respecting voters' time. No need to delete these nominations as, if they are not promoted, you can always nominate again. Charles (talk) 22:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Unique in scope, ergo best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lexus LF-NX - front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Renault Twizy Z.E. Sport F1.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lexus LF-NX - front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Renault Twizy Z.E. Sport F1.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lexus LF-NX - front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 23:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Renault Twizy Z.E. Sport F1.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC)