User talk:Alensha

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive: 2005–2008


Önnek egy új üzenete van[edit]

És ezt még közlik is önnel.

Ha az üzenetet meg akarja hallgatni, nyomja meg az egyes gombot.

Ha az üzenetet nem akarja meghallgatni, ne nyomja meg az egyes gombot.

Ha az üzenetet vissza akarja vágni a feladóhoz, nyomja meg a hármas gombot.

Ha tudni akarja, mi lesz akkor, ha a kettes gombot nyomja meg, nyomja meg a kettes gombot.

Ha azt akarja, hogy az üzenetrögzítő fogja be, nyomja meg az ötös gombot.

Sajnáljuk, de pillanatnyilag ez a szolgáltatás nem elérhető. Próbálja meg később.

157.181.96.34 20:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ha barackot akarok nyomni az üzenetküldő buksijára, mi a teendő? – Alensha msg 21:03, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

cica nem szeret kategorizálni, de fog >:-)[edit]

Neeee már, hadd ne kelljen! :( Elegem van belőle. Satak Lord (talk) 20:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tej kirakva errefelé kószáló cicáknak
File:Ah_hotep.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 17:24, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re / milk[edit]

Hogy is mondjak az angolok? Szkru ju. IP

Tej errefelé kószáló cicáknak, nyakonöntés céljából[edit]

<monológ>Jön a mail, hogy új megjegyzés van a commonsos vitalapomon. Rohanok lélekszakadva, hátha licencnélküli képemet találták meg, vagy ilyesmi. Erre kiderül, hogy megint csak a macska szemtelenkedett ide, csak IP mögé bújva, mert annyira fél a sárga csíktól, hogy be se mer jelentkezni. Nehéz az élet, kéremszépen. * sóhaj * </monológ> – Alensha msg 22:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ja és szkru ju tú. Lehetőleg a Szedlacsekné által get szkrúd. – Alensha msg 22:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

cica megint[edit]

File:Ah_hotep.jpg

File:Sopronivárosháza.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Satak Lord (talk) 17:24, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Csak hogy lássa kollegina, hogy fontos üzenetért is tudok neki szólni. Satak Lord (talk) 18:38, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hát ha még be is tudnád linkelni... Mert se a kép, se a törlési allap nem létezett sose :) – Alensha msg 20:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huú, srága csík[edit]

Feltöttem egy újabb találdkistílusú házikót Félegyházacityből :D Satak Lord (talk) 09:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Az oké, hogy személyesen csak szerdánként vagy hajlandó írni, ami nem baj, mert nyugton van tőled, de hogy itt se lepsz meg egy sárga csíkkal, az már több a soknál. Öri hari. Satak Lord (talk) 16:09, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Juhuhu de ritkán jársz be ide. Satak Lord (talk) 18:29, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Akarom-e valamit? Az eszedbe se jut, hogy erre mit lehetne válaszolni? Mondjuk egy egyes szám második személyű névmást tárgyesetben??? Satak Lord (talk) 19:02, 28 October 2009 (UTC) (komolyan ne vedd, persze, majd pont)[reply]


Figyelj csak, amit feltöltöttem, és nem írtam angolul, azt lefordíthatnád. Nekem nincs kedvem. Mert persze olyan baromi egyszerű lenne megnyitni egy netes szótárt, de akkor sincs (pl. a zsebóra hogy van ánglisul). Satak Lord (talk) 22:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


kiscica


Neked mi nyomja szíved, hogy még álmodban (=commonsot szerkesztve) is cicákat mondsz? --Satak Lord (talk) 09:21, 28 November 2009 (UTC) (mínusz két nap)[reply]
csak az editcountert akartam engedélyezni, kell hozzá egy akármilyen szerk a vitalapomon, és a szerkösszefoglalóba írni, hogy I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms vagy mi. de nem működik. magyarán itt kivételesen nem a szerkesztés volt a lényeg, hanem az összefoglaló. te meg hess innen. – Alensha msg 20:38, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(lemondó sóhaj) a saját vitalapodon kell beírni a szöveget a szerkösszefoglalóba, te igen állat... – Alensha msg 11:18, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Néha félbehagyom[edit]

Magyar: Néha előfordul, hogy egy-egy kép áttöltését félbe kell hagynom. Most pl. el kellett mennem csempét ragasztani. Azért köszi a Bikkessy kép dokumentációjának gondozását! :-) Beroesz (talk) 14:09, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ez az a népviseletes volt? Jó, hogy szólsz, meg akartam nézni, ki olyan elvetemült, hogy kategorizálás nélkül itt hagyja :D (vajon most miért nem kaptam mailt a commonstól, hogy szerkesztették a vitalapom? a Satak Lord minden hülyéskedéséről bezzeg azonnal értesít...)Alensha msg 00:08, 9 December 2009 (UTC) ma érkezett meg az értesítő mail. gyors a commons. – Alensha msg 13:58, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, done. – Alensha msg 16:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

régen izentem itt[edit]

úgyhogy ezúton is küldök vissza egy borzolást, hogy tudd, milyen is az :D Satak Lord (talk) 19:25, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:NYC_Halloween_Parade_-_Shuffle.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:NYC_Halloween_Parade_-_Shuffle.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:05, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

rég izentem én is[edit]

úgyhogy üzenek egyet. üzentem. Satak Lord (talk) 16:28, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

annyira tudtam, hogy te leszel az… – Alensha msg 17:03, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File:Bakonygyirot church 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:28, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

your speedy requests[edit]

Hi Alensha, did you notify the original uploader of your deletion requests (File:Meetup Szeged 05.07.08 no01.jpg etc.)? --Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nelson mandela.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 13:40, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About a scarab[edit]

Hello. In my wanderings on Commons I noted this picture uploaded by you. I'm interested in finding more about the yellow scarab (the one below Ptahhotep) with a royal name which is barely readable, so I was wondering if you took a picture of some captions related to these scarabs, too. Regards, --Khruner (talk) 11:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lóránt Gyula szülőháza.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Beloiannisz church.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Beloiannisz church.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ha jól sejtem, a Wikipédiáról hoztad át, de akkor ezt explicite fel kéne tüntetni, lehetőleg a konkrét fájlnévvel. (Megpróbálhatsz rákeresni a címére, ha nem tudod, bár ez az eszköz, úgy látom, csak a cím elején keres.) – Tacsipacsi (talk) 13:45, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tacsipacsi: Beírtam, nem tudom, ez így jó-e. – Alensha msg 14:37, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kicsit pofoztam rajta, szerintem így már jó. A dátumot kiszedtem, mert az a készítés dátumára vonatkozik, márpedig olyan korán még júliusban sem kel a nap, hogy reggel hét óra előtt ilyenek legyenek a fényviszonyok. 🙂 – Tacsipacsi (talk) 20:31, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Baja has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 09:05, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:TurkishPeople.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aybeg (talk) 15:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Birtalan Balázs.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Birtalan Balázs.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Regasterios (talk) 14:49, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pretorius.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]