User talk:AlMare/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Mussolini Casa Natale Predappio.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Mussolini Casa Natale Predappio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--62.216.206.141 01:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


Image:Dilthey1_retouched.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Dilthey1_retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Tischbeinahe 10:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Vercingetorix stater n2 CdM.jpg

Hi! I'll revert my new version and upload it separately if you like. White balance is tricky because it's a mix of tungsten and (mainly) daylight. I picked as reference the museum notices which are printed on white paper. Now that you say it, there is a pinkish tinge on the picture. I'll upload new versions. Anyway, I shoot in RAW so you can try to cook up your own version if you wish. It's a bit late now in France; I'll do it all tomorrow. Don't hesitate to give me a little prod if I forget you. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 22:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you in advance. Ciao, --AM 14:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
I uploaded the new version at Image:Vercingetorix stater n2 CdM alternate.jpg. Does it look more natural to you? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:29, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not really convinced. But there is no comparison, so it is hard to tell for me how it looks in reality. What material is it? Gold? Bronze? At least the three-dimensional impression is much better here. --AM 17:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
I suspect those are gold staters. I've always found it difficult to "recreate" a correct colour for gold when I couldn't control exactly the colour balance. Following your remarks, I'll revert my updates and upload them separately. Still, can I crop Image:Vercingetorix stater n2 CdM.jpg? I feel there's too much empty space around the coin. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:39, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
I wouldn't do it, it's perfect like it is, the coin needs some space around to develop its irregular shape. But this is a question of your personal taste. And it is your photo. You can try several versions. Sometimes you are blind and don't see the obvious. In the end Trial and error never fails. ;-) --AM 21:09, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


Image:Totò.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Totò.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Trixt 23:59, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


Image:Hitler_in_Paris.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Hitler_in_Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kam Solusar 04:17, 26 May 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Albert_I._Of_Monaco_Nadar.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Albert_I._Of_Monaco_Nadar.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 17:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Alexander_III._Czar_Of_Russia_Nadar.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Alexander_III._Czar_Of_Russia_Nadar.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 17:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely ridiculous! Nadar died in 1910. --AM (talk) 20:54, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

USB Flash Drive

Hi AlMare, I've already written on your german talkpage, but you've said you're 'vorwiegend hier tätig'. My friend has got a USB Flash Drive with no name or box with a name on it and so we can't get it running on her old Windows 98, without a driver. The stick exactly looks like your animation. Could you please write me the name oder product number or whatever, so we can look for it? Thanks a lot. Sven 19:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

No idea. I bought it and threw the papers away. But it works fine under XP. --AM (talk) 20:49, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Atelier_Nadar_35BoulevardDesCapucines_1860_Nadar.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Atelier_Nadar_35BoulevardDesCapucines_1860_Nadar.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 10:44, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Added source. --AM (talk) 11:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Great. Could you add book name? "a Book" is very wide source, you know :)--OsamaK 12:43, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Good enough? :) --AM (talk) 21:38, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Sure, thanks! Don't stop uploading.--OsamaK 12:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Banana flower

Hey

Thanks or voting for my image at FPC [I would have preferred a support :)]. When you say it need dusting, what do you mean? Is there anything I can do to convince you to change your vote, as you are probably the deciding factor? Regards Muhammad 05:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

On the upper part of the flower there are a lot of light dust particles. You could clone them out. I'm sorry, but Crapload is right. Still a nice pic! By the way, I've taken this one last year. Regards, --AM (talk) 16:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. Shouldn't the presence of dust increase its EV ;)? What lens did you use for your picture? Muhammad 05:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Nothing special, it'a a macro-shot with a simple Canon Ixus 70. Ciao, --AM (talk) 08:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Adolphe_Thiers_Nadar.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Adolphe_Thiers_Nadar.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 19:54, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Please read {{PD-old}} twice. It says in bold text "life of the author plus 70 years". Now, we have no idea about the author and hir life. Nader book was published in 2006, which makes the work non-free—at least with {{PD-old}} license. Please check COM:CT#Public_domain and tell me if you find any acceptable (no doubts, no assumptions) license for this image.--OsamaK 02:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Gaspard-Félix Tournachon alias NADAR, died 21. of march 1910! --AM (talk) 16:57, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Great. Please add this information to the image(s) that taken by Nader. A book is not a reason to be free.--OsamaK 15:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
This information you can find already in the description of all my Nadar-scans: Creator:Félix Nadar

Now please undelete Image:Albert_I._Of_Monaco_Nadar.jpg, regards, --AM (talk) 17:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

If you don't undelete it I will have to re-upload it. --AM (talk) 20:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm not an admin. Please report this in COM:UNDEL.--OsamaK 03:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Ok, I see. --AM (talk) 14:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Italian problems

Hi AlMare, I think you should read this. There is at least one photo you took among those that the Sopraintendenza ai Beni Culturali dell'Etruria meridionale want to be deleted. There is no consensus on deleting all the photos, but you may want to have the photos you uploaded to be deleted. Bye --Jaqen (talk) 23:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

I read parts of this discussion before and I can't believe it! I'm taking photos in italian museums since 30 years and nobody ever wanted a fee for photographing inside the museums. I remember darkly one or two cases where they sold tickets for using tipods and some museums that did not allow cameras. But in the big majority photos without flash where allowed. We should not give away theses pieces of the heritage of human culture in advance. And, no, I don't want my photos to be deleted. Ciao, --AM (talk) 17:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


Image:NorbertBlüm.GeorgSteinitz.Salzburg_retouched.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:NorbertBlüm.GeorgSteinitz.Salzburg_retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

sугсго 10:02, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Schade, war ein gutes Plakat. --AM (talk) 23:52, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


File:2008-Dirmstein-Laurentius-kath-Hochaltar-037_retouched.jpg

File deletion warning File:2008-Dirmstein-Laurentius-kath-Hochaltar-037_retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

sугсго 10:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, AlMare!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:36, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Via Appia.jpg

You are right, the Sinuessa red track is now wrong. I will fix it as soon as possible. Thanks --EH101 (talk) 12:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. Regards, --AM (talk) 16:26, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Museo Nazionale di Reggio Calabria.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Museo Nazionale di Reggio Calabria.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

-93.144.188.53 10:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Further Information for File:Teltowkanal im Winter retouched.jpg

Hi AlMare. Can you please add further information to File:Teltowkanal im Winter retouched.jpg? The given license cannot be fulfilled without information on author and source. Also image desciption would be useful. Regards, norro 10:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Done. This was a retouche-job and I forgot to remove the format and to adjust the links. Ciao, --AM (talk) 17:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. --norro 22:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Camparibottle hd.jpg

Hello,

It seems that this image comes from http://www.camparigroup.com/en/press_media/image_gallery.jsp that's not your own photo. Yann (talk) 11:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Excuse me, I've mixed up two pics. Originally, in the german article de:Campari there was a photo I've edited a long time before. Afterwards somebody modified the article and replaced my photo with the one you've deleted. Regards, --AM (talk) 12:10, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Hanspeter Kraft.jpg

Hallo, AlMare! Ich war mal so frei und habe Deinen Schnellöschantrag für das Bild durch die entsprechende Permission-Seite für die MFO-Bilder ersetzt. Ich hoffe, das war o.k. Viele Grüße --Angela H. (talk) 16:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, ich hatte nur die deutsche Seite gelesen, da steht nichts von creative commons. Ist dann wohl ok. Gruß zurück, --AM (talk) 16:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Es sieht so aus, als hätten sie die deutsche Fassung mit dem Haftungsausschluß bei sich selbst abgeschrieben… ;-) Und als wäre danach jemand gekommen, der ihnen gesagt hätte, daß eine Creative-Commons-Lizenz auch toll wäre. Viele Grüße --Angela H. (talk) 17:18, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Ah, ja... :) --AM (talk) 17:53, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Roman Bar.jpg

You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but File:Roman Bar.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Polarlys (talk) 19:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Airport FRA Kimorg-20090331-125204+0200 (Mathias Ortmann) retouched.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

I added the license. --AM (talk) 13:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Minturno_Plan.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Minturno_Plan.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Minturno_Plan.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Teofilo (talk) 09:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


File:Michele_Merkin_1_ad.jpg

File:Michele_Merkin_1_ad.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Knuffig: Als Urheber/Bearbeiter einer anderen Version werde ich erst gar nicht benachrichtigt und finde das hier per Zufall? -- smial (talk) 10:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Ich weiß nicht was das soll. Sind wir einem seiner Lieblingsmodells auf die Zehen getreten?? --AM (talk) 13:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Ich habe keine Ahnung. Die Nacktfotos sehr junger Frauen eines "reputablen Künstlers" wie Klashorst werden beinahe allesamt durchgewunken auch ohne jede Freigabe durch die fotografierten Personen, weil sie ja möglicherwesie irgendwo verwendet werden könnten, abgeleitete Werke eines freigegebenen Fotos eines professionellen Models werden als "Spaß-Edit" abqualifiziert und sollen gelöscht wedren, obwohl sie in Verwendung sind. Da steht doch irgendwas auf dem Kopf. -- smial (talk) 13:55, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Es geschehen noch Zeichen und Wunder... -- smial (talk) 16:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Mit Mattbuck hatte ich schon irgendwannmal zu tun, scheint vernünftig zu sein. Die Aktion war ja auch ein Witz. Ciao, --AM (talk) 17:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Mattbuck gehört m.E. zu den Leuten, die sich Argumente durchaus ohne Scheuklappen ansehen und nicht ideologisch argumentieren. -- smial (talk) 10:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


File tagging Image:Orecchiette Pugliesi.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Orecchiette Pugliesi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Orecchiette Pugliesi.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Jodo (talk) 18:52, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Hold your breath. --AM (talk) 21:29, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Museum of Ethnology Vienna 001.JPG

Hi, do you think you could retouch this image and increase the sharpness File:Museum of Ethnology Vienna 001.JPG? Thank you very much. Gryffindor (talk) 16:59, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

This photo was already edited. Do you have the original too? It is out of focus indeed. But I could try to sharpen it a bit. Regards, --AM (talk) 12:43, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
I made a first try. But the shutter speed was too long - you can't get it really sharp. --AM (talk) 13:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I just uploaded the original image, will it help you? File:Museum of Ethnology Vienna 001 original.jpg. Thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 23:15, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I see. But I don't have the time right now. Be patient, maybe next weekend. Regards, --AM (talk) 20:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Alright thank you. Also if you could maybe improve some of this image that would be fantastic File:Cathedral Holy Resurrection Stanislawow3.jpg? thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 21:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I had a try on this one, but maybe it is a little over-sharpened now. Ciao, --AM (talk) 17:54, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks alot. Gryffindor (talk) 08:26, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Via Appia map

Hi, you are the author of the file File:Via Appia map.jpg. If you have some free time, do you think you could put on the map Aequum Tuticum, between Beneventum and Aecae (its position is on the detailed map File:Via Appia.jpg. If had been able to do, I would've put it by myself, but I had not. I hope you could help me. Thanks in advance.--Thecinic (talk) 10:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Done, I looked for this place and it really was a bigger town 200 BC. In the italian wikipedia they haven an article. Regards. --AM (talk) 16:28, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Well done, thank you again. see you.--Thecinic (talk) 18:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


File:Orata al Cartoccio.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Orata al Cartoccio.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--High Contrast (talk) 18:32, 24 August 2009 (UTC)


File:Le_Donne_Del_Vino.jpg

File:Le_Donne_Del_Vino.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:02, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

amaro bottles!

I love your pictures of amaro bottles; did you collect the bottles in Italy? We have a large collection ourselves, but haven't gotten around to photographing them all. good work! (unsigned edit by user:Shabbychef on 16:34, 12 October 2009)

Thank you :-) Most of the bottles we bought in Italy. I know, there are much more different brands with very funny labels there. Just use one dull autum sunday and take photos of your collection. Salute! --AM (talk) 16:34, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

I ask about "Fellatio_Isis_Osiris_modified.jpg"

Excuse me,I want to ask about an image called "Fellatio_Isis_Osiris_modified.jpg" which you contributed. That image is a trimming with Chapter 1 of "Book of the Dead" possessed by the British Museum. That it is a mummy of a man called "ANI" that it is drawn and that the woman who wrote that you do a fellatio is a wife of "ANI" or a younger sister be written by "エジプトの死者の書―宗教思想の根源を探る" ISBN-10: 4409420070 ISBN-13: 978-4409420072

I think this image not to be Isis with Osiris who is ancient Egyptian God. Please show the grounds that you named "Fellatio_Isis_Osiris_modified" to the title of the file.Thank you.Arude (talk) 08:02, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

I have only retouched this photo, origininal uploader was Cherubino, you better should ask him. Regards, --AM (talk) 21:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
I thank for quick correspondence.--Arude (talk) 20:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


File:Erna_Wazinski_retouched.jpg

File:Erna_Wazinski_retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ALE! ¿…? 08:34, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Jacopo de' Barbari - Venetie MD retouched.png

Not sure why you reverted back to your earlier version of this image; it has blown out highlights in central lower part, has inconsistent tone and is lacking in detail (again, especially in the lower half). Would you prefer I just upload my retouched version as another file? Earthsound (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes. No problem to have several versions. Regards, --AM (talk) 02:19, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Sounds good, thanks. Earthsound (talk) 20:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome. --AM (talk) 21:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Danke !

Hallo AlMare. Herzlichen Dank für deine Verbesserung der Map von der Provinz Neapel. Ich habe gar keine Fähigkeiten dieser Art! Falls du Spass haben solltest an solchen Korrekturen, hier hätte es noch eine, und hier noch eine andere die zu machen wäre. Was ich bis jetzt so entdeckt habe... Herzliche Grüsse, --DenghiùComm (talk) 23:23, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Erledigt. Wenn Du öfter solche Sachen hast, dann kannst Du die Bilder auch bei uns in der Fotowerkstatt einstellen. Da sind einige Leute, die sich mit digitaler Bildbearbeitung auskennen. Schönen Gruß, --AM (talk) 17:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Danke für den Hinweis. Leider sind die zwei Maps nicht verbessert worden. Irgend etwas ist nicht geraten. Beide haben noch dieselben Fehler! Liebe Grüsse, --DenghiùComm (talk) 17:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Doch die Karten sind jetzt ok. Du mußt nur den Browser-cache leeren. --AM (talk) 18:00, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Ok, jetz sehe ich es auch. Nun "Cannobio" is jetz ok, aber die Gemeinde "Anzasca" (die es nicht gibt!) sollte in "Macugnaga" umgetauft werden. Nochmals herzlichen dank dafür! --DenghiùComm (talk) 17:18, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Geändert, schönen Sonntag, --AM (talk) 11:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Perfekt! Wunderbar! Nochmals denghiù weri motch! Herzlichst, --DenghiùComm (talk) 22:12, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Stalin-Lenin-Kalinin-1919.jpg

Hi!

Just to be exact - back in 1919 there was actually neither Soviet Union nor Communist Party of the Soviet Union. There were the Soviet Russia and the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party.--Uostofchuodnego (talk) 09:28, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

You are right, the name at that time was "Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic" or simply "Soviet Russia". But the "Russian Social Democratic Labour Party" was renamed to "Russian Communist Party" in 1918. I will change that. Thank you. Regards, --AM (talk) 16:30, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AlMare/Archive_2&oldid=557121751"