User talk:Airwolf/2010-2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive for 2009 is here

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Robinson R44 Góraszka 2008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. ZooFari 02:53, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euro Mediterranean Boeing 757-2Q8 Gdańsk 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. Yarl 19:33, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CSS-13 Góraszka 2008 241.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. Yarl 19:36, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow Tiger Moth Góraszka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. Yarl 19:36, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mi-2 Darłowo 2009 .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. Haha in the window. ZooFari 17:56, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mil Mi-2.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polish Army Kołobrzeg 112.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. ZooFari 23:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Żelazny and Boeing Stearman.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough. ZooFari 19:04, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breitling Albatros 9421.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.ZooFari 16:25, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Let L410UVP-E16 Góraszka 2008 edit2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Let L410UVP-E16 Góraszka 2008 edit2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CSS-13 Góraszka 6212.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good capture of the motion (including the propeller)! --MattiPaavola 20:34, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Czech Sokół 8488.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Another good air-wolf :) ZooFari 19:01, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you :) Airwolf 19:46, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! F-16 Solo Display Team Radom 2009 d.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --MattiPaavola 12:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Polish Army Kołobrzeg 077.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Polish Army Kołobrzeg 077.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:04, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!
Is it possible to have an English caption for this picture?
--Berru (talk) 15:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Żelazny and Boeing Stearman 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Żelazny and Boeing Stearman 2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polish Army Kołobrzeg 077.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I wonder what that object in the air is? -- H005 12:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
An educated guess: Category:Cartridge ejection Airwolf 12:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That was my first guess too, but do they really shoot at a public demonstration? -- H005 16:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
They do, with blanks, of course. Airwolf 16:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

Nomination[edit]

HI ! I thank you a lot for the nomination of my picture of this Elephant seal in SG. I m impressed and thankful for the votes !!!! I trust you in the futur of this picture (POTY ...) because I m sorry I haven t got much time now. Thanks a lot again AirWolf. --Butterfly voyages (talk) 04:10, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TS-11 Iskra SP-YIR Radom 2009 9585.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough for me. ZooFari 00:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jurgis Kairys Su-31 Góraszka 5950.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, gives a good impression of high altitude. ZooFari 00:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Radom 2009 v.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. ZooFari 00:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Radom 2009 b.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --MattiPaavola 22:03, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Czech Mi-24 CIAF.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment The sky at right is 'dirty'. Otherwise good. --Cayambe 15:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I think the dirt on the sky is the grass mentioned by Airwolf above. The image is not razor sharp, but the composition is excellent and somewhat long exposure time looks so good on the rotor. To sum up, this is a QI IMO. Might have been a FP also if Wolf had been luckier with the weather. --MattiPaavola 10:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Ok, agree with that. QI to me too after that. --Cayambe 15:32, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! M28 Skytruck Góraszka 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Cayambe 14:59, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piper Cub SP-AWP Radom 9623.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Done, I hope it looks OK. Yarl 16:43, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow PZL-104 Wilga 5767.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Ianare 06:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TS-11 Iskra Biało-Czerwone Iskry Radom 2009 b.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Low-light, but still good quality. --Jolly Janner 23:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mirounga leonina.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mirounga leonina.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 07:59, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Czech Sokół 8479.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good --Pjt56 21:27, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Su-27UBM Radom 2009 c.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Su-27UBM Radom 2009 c.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zlin Żelazny Góraszka 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Okay to me. Maedin 08:57, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template for Konflikty.pl website ?[edit]

Hello Airwolf,

As I (try to) follow FP, VI and QI to write descriptions in french, I noticed the numerous pictures from the Konflikty.pl website. First of all, congratulations for all those pictures!

I thought it might be interesting to build some template, along the lines of Template:Konflikty.pl permission, which would include both the {{Copyrighted free use}} and the OTRS stuff. The advantages : first of all, easier to add to files. It would also be possible to localise even more the required conditions (as of now, both English and Polish are displayed, and I crave to do a French translation :D). It would also be possible to set up some category in order to keep track of the files. This gets really interesting with tools such as GLAMorous, which bring some numbers about file usage among the Wikimedia projects.

What do you think ? If you are interested, I can make such a template, with input from you of course.

Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 22:18, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad you like this idea!
I drafted {{Konflikty.pl}}. Texts and layout can be changed if you wish. Feel free to edit it as much as you see fit. I can do it for you if you want, just leave me a note, here or on my talk page.
Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 15:59, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done The french version is updated according to your texts. I guess you can start mass-using it! Jean-Fred (talk) 19:42, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Czech Sokół 8480.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status.-Ankara 20:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC) Which word in the phrase Photo by myself is unclear? Airwolf 20:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Łukasz Golowanow is User:Airwolf, it is correct nomination. Nice Photo --George Chernilevsky 20:34, 19 February 2010 (UTC) You quote something that is not included in the information. Anyway, I am sorry I missed it but there is no reason to be rude. Why not crop the photo, it's too much gray sky.--Ankara 20:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Yellow Tiger Moth Góraszka.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Yellow Tiger Moth Góraszka.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:09, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About the Cub SP-AWP[edit]

Hello Airwolf!

I just saw your really beautiful photo of the yellow Cub SP-AWP (file Piper_Cub_SP-AWP_Radom_9623.JPG). Do you know if this plane was bought from Sweden in the late 2003? A Cub SE-AWP was then sold to Poland, and that plane has a special history. I would not be surprised if SE-AWP was just changed to SP-AWP if that registration was not occupied in Poland, so it could well be the same plane.

A famous swedish pilot Albin Ahrenberg got about 90 war Cubs from the US forces in Europe directly after WW2, restored some 60 of them thoroughly and sold them for a very low prize to private persons, emerging clubs and small air companies. This really got Sweden on the wings. But the rest was scrapped or remained as spare parts. Some years ago, I spoke to a man who bought some of these spare parts and built a Cub from them back in 1948. That plane got a completely new construction number from the swedish civil aviation administration, LFV 1-1948, where LFV is short for that administration. Some people who know its history call it "the spare part Cub". The registration was SE-AWP, and it would be very interesting to know if the Cub on your photo is that plane.

Best regards Rolf B (talk) 22:47, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for confirming on my Swedish talk page that SP-AWP was previously SE-AWP! But I also found this Air-Britain web page that declares SP-AWP as being "Ex 42-1262(n),SE-AWD,SE-AWP". My description of the spare part Cub seems to contradict this heritage line. I don't want to create new aviation history, so I'd better explain my story a little further for you and for anybody who finds this discussion.
Olof, the man who assembled SE-AWP from spare parts, did not buy the parts directly from Albin Ahrenberg or his company, but from a well-known Swedish mechanic and spare part dealer, Figge Bergman. Figge was partly based in Örebro at that time, a town situated roughly half-way between Stockholm and Göteborg. The Cub SE-AWD, mentioned by Air-Britain, crashed near Örebro in august 1947. One could guess that Figge took over the wreck and stored usable parts in Aero-Frabh's barracks in Örebro. Two more Cubs crashed in Örebro the same year. SE-ATN was completely destroyed in a violent crash, but the crash of SE-ASY in may 1947 was rather soft, and that Cub was owned by Aero-Frabh where Figge worked and was also a share-holder. So usable parts from that Cub might also have ended up in that barracks from which Olof got his kit of Cub parts.
I talked to Olof today and asked him if he knew about any ingredients from SE-ASY or SE-AWD in his spare part Cub. He did not. The fuselage was just a clean metal skelton, and he was pretty sure that Figge got it from Albin Ahrenbergs storage place at Lindarängen outside Stockholm and that it had never been in the air since its military duty in WW2. Olof got the engine from CVA, the military workshop in Arboga. But the wings could come from anywhere, maybe from SE-ASY and/or SE-AWD.
In short, SE-AWP could contain some parts from SE-AWD, but probably not the fuselage. Another detail: According to the Swedish Aviation Historical Society, SE-AWD was ex 43-1262, not 42-1262 as stated in Air-Britain. But who is right and who is wrong about that is another story that might never be sorted out. /Rolf B (talk) 21:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Airwolf, I would appreciate if you comment on this nomination and my edit to the image, also I've put your name as creator but I wanted to be sure, are you photographer or Maciek Hypś?   ■ MMXX  talk  18:28, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP candidates[edit]

Witam, Łukasz!
Do nominacji są:

Będę głosował za. Tylko jeden tydzień, (by one per week)
Pozdrawiam -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:48, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Türk Yıldızları photo 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 13:08, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Breitling photo 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 13:10, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Belgian F-16 Demo photo 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 16:31, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jurgis Kairys Su-31 Góraszka 5952.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 13:07, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 MiG-29 from Slovakia photo 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to me. Rama 07:21, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Breitling photo 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 15:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Yak-52 photo 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 11:42, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Breitling photo 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 07:05, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jak-18 Płock.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 07:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LPR Płock.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- George Chernilevsky 07:07, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polish Army Kołobrzeg 122.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Composition is a bit tight on the right side. Rama 07:17, 16 August 2010 (UTC) ... a matter of taste to me. Go as close as possible, especially for action shots! --Ikiwaner 18:30, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, but with a short lens then. Rama 09:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Jak-18 Płock.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jak-18 Płock.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:59, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Radom 2009 t.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good indeed !--Jebulon 21:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Arrows Radom 2009 a.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 15:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Patrouille Suisse photo 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Brillant réveil. Rama 11:18, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PZL-130 Orlik Goraszka 2008 1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This looks soo dynamic! Light is good too. --Ikiwaner 14:14, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Curtiss Jenny Płock.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- George Chernilevsky 06:00, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ORP Arctowski.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK -- George Chernilevsky 06:00, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Belgian F-16 photo 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 CommentIt's abit soft, I'm afraid. Rama 11:16, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I can read: Push button to open the door. Nice balance of ISO 160, 1/800 sec, f/6.3. Can easily be used in any WP project. Qualifies IMO. --Nevit 20:30, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jurgis Kairys Su-31 Góraszka 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments synamic image, well exposed --Ikiwaner 19:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Red Arrows.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ORP Orzeł foto 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Nevit 14:51, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Curtiss Jenny Płock 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Nevit 14:52, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Breitling photo 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  SupportQI --Nevit 14:31, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Türk Yıldızları photo 36 brightened.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  SupportQI --Nevit 14:31, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kecskemet 2010 Türk Yıldızları photo 36 brightened.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kecskemet 2010 Türk Yıldızları photo 36 brightened.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 04:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Wings of Storm photo 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to me. Rama 21:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Patrouille Suisse photo 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and usefull. --Nevit 11:13, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Red Arrows Radom 2009 t.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Red Arrows Radom 2009 t.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:59, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMP-1 Kolobrzeg 214.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:28, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
ORP Orzeł (Kilo class submarine).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
de Havilland Tiger Moth.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Patrouille Suisse photo 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lacks a bit of sharpness, but QI nevertheless. --Cayambe 18:32, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Türk Yıldızları photo 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- George Chernilevsky 19:33, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 MiG-29 from Slovakia photo 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piper Cub Góraszka 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 19:39, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Helicopter SA 330 Puma[edit]

Hallo Airwolf
Thank you for promoting my picture of the helicopter. Perhaps you may also have a look on the "Valued images candidates", there I have just uploaded as a candidate for a "Valued image set" 6 photos of this helicopter in action. Greetings. --Llez (talk) 16:05, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Czech W-3 Sokół 8496 cropped.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Czech W-3 Sokół 8496 cropped.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zlin 242L.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UAZ-452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polski MiG-29.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support--Lipedia 13:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! M4 Sherman.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yeah ! Destroy them all !--Jebulon 15:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC) Maybe one of the absurdest composition I've seen here. Technically OK(=zero kill). --Ikiwaner 10:57, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! M28 Skytruck Góraszka 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IMO, not already promotted because of the tight crop... But otherwise good, hard to decline ! let's wait...--Jebulon 17:08, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Support QI IMO --George Chernilevsky 14:54, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Breitling photo 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition. --Kae 09:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Robinson R44 Raven II Bakoma.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments okay --Carschten 18:36, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kecskemet 2010 Breitling photo 9.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kecskemet 2010 Breitling photo 9.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 04:59, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Breitling photo 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 06:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Türk Yıldızları photo 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition, QI to me--Lmbuga 19:35, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Rafale photo 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Of course.--Mbz1 02:52, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Curtiss Jenny Płock 2010.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Curtiss Jenny Płock 2010.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:58, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 C-130 photo 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dull colours, but like the effect of propellers. --kallerna 10:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ping[edit]

Hi Airwolf, I sent you an email. Regards.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:38, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A good thing you gave me this notification. It got stuck in my spambox, so I wouldn't have noticed it. Thank you for your recomendation. Wolf (talk) 12:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Wings of Storm photo 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Is good Albertus teolog 21:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)@ Albertus teolog : A "Pilatus" is good ? --Jebulon 09:30, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 MiG-21 LanceR photo 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI--Jebulon 09:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMP-2 on a Tatra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Promote, quick, before is runs afoul of 2010 Wikimedia Study of Controversial Content! Rama 07:10, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Türk Yıldızları photo 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. Rama 14:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boeing 767-300.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. Rama 14:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OK-CCA - Central Charter Airlines Boeing 737-300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK.--Mbz1 15:09, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MiG-29 Ostrava.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I would have cropped out half people, but, if you like it this way, fine with me.--Mbz1 15:09, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jurgis Kairys Su-31 Góraszka 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 00:07, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Frecce Tricolori photo 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good, I can hear the engines !--Jebulon 23:19, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

English wiki[edit]

I wanted to tell you, your some of your images are being nominated on English Wikipedia for Featured Picture here is the nominations if you want to see them, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/HMCS St. John's (FFH 340) and Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/F-16 Solo Display Team Spongie555 (talk) 21:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think they both will pass but let see how they go. Spongie555 (talk) 23:32, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your image of HMCS St. Johns did not get promoted. it needed one more vote to pass but the other one looks like it will pass. Spongie555 (talk) 00:25, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A321-211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Lmbuga 21:00, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SP-LPA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Alofok 15:49, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L-159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good! --George Chernilevsky 17:08, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IAR 99.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 17:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurocopter 130 SP-MTB 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ładne jak zawsze --Pudelek 11:48, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tornado F3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment - Technically good, but I'm not sold on the composition. Mattbuck 15:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Support quality and composition are good enough, but light could be better. --Carschten 16:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black Robinson R44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:16, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JK-05L JUNIOR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments schön --Carschten 20:05, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yakovlev Yak-18.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

[edit]

Your F-16 solo display team picture was promoted on eenglish wikipedia. Spongie555 (talk) 21:19, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Breitling photo 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment - could you try cropping out the grass, or at least painting out the shed? Mattbuck 12:15, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How's this? Airwolf 12:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Support quality good. But I think the old crop is better for seeing how high the planes are flying --Carschten 16:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tail of Czech Air Force Airbus A319 CJ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments much better now --Carschten 19:18, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breitling Albatros 9400.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Mattbuck 14:10, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hr. Ms. De Ruyter (F804).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
IAR 99.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

COM:MOP[edit]

Hi! You may add yourself to MOP if you wish. Congratulations! --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You only need 10. And I think the whole plane is better that just the tail end. Wouldn't you? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:15, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Gripen photo 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, if a little grey. Mattbuck 14:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemet 2010 Türk Yıldızları photo 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like it. Mattbuck 17:21, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Photographer's Barnstar[edit]

* The Photographer's Barnstar *
I hereby award to Łukasz Golowanow a.k.a. User Airwolf The Photographer's Barnstar for the perfect photos and his admission to the restricted club Meet our photographers --George Chernilevsky talk 17:57, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Images Set promotion[edit]

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Breitling Jet Team.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Breitling Jet Team.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Regards, --George Chernilevsky talk 19:08, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frecce Tricolori Kecskemet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Jovianeye 20:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frecce Tricolori.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L-159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good, still QI --George Chernilevsky 07:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D-ACKI.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great angle. IdLoveOne 17:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kecskemet 2010 Türk Yıldızları photo 53.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kecskemet 2010 Türk Yıldızları photo 53.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:59, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D-Day Hel 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice snapshot. The crop might be a little too tight. --Makele-90 13:38, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ATR 72 Eurolot SP-LFE EPGD.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments bad background but good quality --Carschten 08:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reims F150L.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Just making sure, you are the author and you own that website linked from the image page, right? --King of Hearts 03:41, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, I am and I do. Airwolf 10:33, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The lighting could be better, but I'll be more forgiving of things in motion. --King of Hearts 05:38, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maersk Elba.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Jovianeye 22:31, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chrysler Pacifica red.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Maersk Elba.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maersk Elba.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:59, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

On which vehicle was this TOPLITE system mounted? Regards, High Contrast (talk) 22:12, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This particular dome is on a PZL W-3 Sokół helicopter. But in general is can be installed on almost any vehicle. Wolf (talk) 22:33, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Added category. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 22:45, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iveco Magirus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 11:00, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]