User talk:AirportExpert

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, AirportExpert!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Brookfield Junction Depot.jpg

File:Brookfield Junction Depot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Danbury, CT Montage 2019.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Danbury, CT Montage 2019.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:50, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

• You don't seem to understand that you must prove that all the images in a collage are freely licensed. See Commons:Collages#License compliance and collages which states that in a collage attribution of the source images is required. Secondarywaltz (talk) 01:17, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

So any images that are included that are my own work, they should be uploaded to Commons and listed?--AirportExpert (talk) 02:51, 13 January 2019 (UTC)AirportExpert

How else could you prove that they legitimate? I'm trying to help you because I don't want to see your work deleted. Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:17, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

File:The Ridge at Danbury Aerial.jpg

File:The Ridge at Danbury Aerial.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Article from before the upload crediting the image to Hearst Connecticut Media (see image 13 of the slideshow) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Whpq (talk) 02:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Acura Type-S Logo.jpg

File:Acura Type-S Logo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Fair use content Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 182.29.25.44.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 12:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Greater Danbury Map.gif

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Greater Danbury Map.gif, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Connecticut 1997 Preserve Candlewood Lake Authority License Plate.gif

Copyright status: File:Connecticut 1997 Preserve Candlewood Lake Authority License Plate.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Connecticut 1997 Preserve Candlewood Lake Authority License Plate.gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Connecticut 1992 Preserve The Sound license plate sample.gif
• File:Connecticut 1999 Municipal License Plate.jpg

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Connecticut 1997 Preserve Candlewood Lake Authority License Plate.gif

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Connecticut 1997 Preserve Candlewood Lake Authority License Plate.gif, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 10:52, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Connecticut 1992 Preserve The Sound license plate sample.gif

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Connecticut 1992 Preserve The Sound license plate sample.gif, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 10:53, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Connecticut 1999 Municipal License Plate.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Connecticut 1999 Municipal License Plate.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

JuTa 10:54, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Mayu Caballero

Mayu Caballero has been marked as an possible copyleft (c) violation. 175.176.2.222 05:12, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

File:KAOO Airport Logo.png

File:KAOO Airport Logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Alachuckthebuck (talk) 20:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello @Alachuckthebuck,

I corrected the file with what I believe is the appropriate licensing. The source is a government entity (Blair County Airport Authority), so the file should remain. Please feel free to change the licensing if you feel there is a more appropriate license to use for this sort of file. I think the speedy deletion should be removed for the time being as well. Thanks, AirportExpert (talk) 20:34, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the prompt response,

If you go to the bottom of the page, you find the dreaded "all rights reserved", indicating the logo is unlikely to be under a free license. At the current time I will keep the speedy tag on the file due to lack of evidence of release under a compatible license. Alachuckthebuck (talk) Alachuckthebuck (talk) 20:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

I understand, I'll be sure to check for that message before uploading logos in the future. Thanks, AirportExpert (talk) 20:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

No problem! No one's perfect, we all make mistakes.Alachuckthebuck (talk) 20:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Same thing for File:Arnold Palmer Regional Airport Logo.png. I reuploaded both files onto the English Wikipedia under fair use. Cheers. funplussmart (talk) 20:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Fair use images can't be accepted here. . Alachuckthebuck (talk) 20:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for sharing this. Unless the logo's source says "all rights reserved", are the logos of government entities generally acceptable to add to Commons? In the United States, almost all airports are controlled by state or local governments, sometimes through a public benefit corporation like an airport authority. If not, I'm happy to add files locally to English Wikipedia if that's the appropriate way of doing it. I just want to make sure I am following the correct procedures. Thanks again, AirportExpert (talk) 20:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

This should help answer your questions. While the federal government releases everything to the public domain, very few municipal governments do this. If an airport is owned by a public benefit corporation, they can apply copyright. EN-wiki can accept fair use content under certain conditions but due to Commons's scope of providing free images for all, we cannot accept fair use content. Fair use is a slippery slope domestically, and treacherous internationally.

But depending on the logo, that might not even matter. Threshold of originality is the standard of what can be copyrighted. If it doesn't meet the threshold (varies by nation) then it can't be copyrighted,and can be added here.

Otherwise, just upload directly to the English Wikipedia. Hope this helps! Alachuckthebuck (talk) 21:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

This helps a lot, thank you! I appreciate you taking the time to share these links with me. I will definitely be reading up on this. AirportExpert (talk) 21:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

No Problem! These topics are the foundation of commons, but definitely take time to learn and understand. I wish you the best of luck! Alachuckthebuck (talk) 21:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)