User talk:Agnes Monkelbaan/Archive 9

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Agnes Monkelbaan/Archive 2: 2018

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wandelingen door de laagveenmoerassen De Deelen A 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 05:42, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wandelingen door de laagveenmoerassen De Deelen A 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:10, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wandelingen door de laagveenmoerassen De Deelen A 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wandelingen door de laagveenmoerassen De Deelen A 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wandelingen door de laagveenmoerassen De Deelen A 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:10, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wandelingen door de laagveenmoerassen De Deelen A 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wandelingen door de laagveenmoerassen De Deelen A 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wandelingen door de laagveenmoerassen De Deelen A 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wandelingen door de laagveenmoerassen De Deelen A 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wandelingen door de laagveenmoerassen De Deelen A 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wandelingen door de laagveenmoerassen De Deelen A 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wandelingen door de laagveenmoerassen De Deelen A 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wandelingen door de laagveenmoerassen De Deelen A 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:24, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duinroos (Rosa pimpinellifolia). Locatie, De Kruidhof Kruidentuin in Friesland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Bijbels plantenboek van cordes staal. Locatie, De Kruidhof Buitenpost 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bijbels plantenboek van cordes staal. Locatie, De Kruidhof Buitenpost 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bloemknop Persicaria polymorpha. Locatie, Tuinen Mien Ruys in Dedemsvaart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:06, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:15, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:06, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:03, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:28, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:22, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good A.Savin Fri, 27 Apr 2018 16:11:03 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality IMO --PJDespa 17:20, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. The Photographer Sun, 29 Apr 2018 15:56:26 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Basotxerri Tue, 01 May 2018 17:20:51 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --PJDespa 16:17, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Poco a poco Thu, 03 May 2018 18:47:19 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Works good in B&W, a pity for the wire, though. Good quality. Basotxerri Thu, 03 May 2018 16:03:44 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:28, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 May 2018 (UTC) {{QICpromoted|File:Schokland._UNESCO-Werelderfgoed_actm_10.jpg|Schokland. UNESCO World Heritage. Image Untitled by Hans Blank on Schokland at lighthouse’s house.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:48, 5 May 2018 (UTC)|
Could you remove the spot left to the left foot? --Basotxerri 17:29, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done. Removed spots. Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:03, 6 May 2018 (UTC)} --QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:54, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 05:06, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 16:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 16:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:51, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:36, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:22, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:47, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:04, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support For me a classical FPC. Very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:04, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Assuming that the image isn't tilted. --Basotxerri 16:53, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
*  Comment Thank you for your review. I had expected this comment. But the gun is crooked on the pedestal.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:09, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:19, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:18, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. A nice place. I should visit it too. ;-) --XRay 16:18, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 17:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:00, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 17:27, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 17:27, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:14, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:14, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:39, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ccw tilt, otherwise great photo.--ArildV 15:08, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:31, 20 May 2018 (UTC) Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:23, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:30, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 Support Good quality after adding a missing cat for th subject --Poco a poco 15:31, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done. Category added. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:28, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:30, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:31, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:57, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 16:06, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tsungam 09:16, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 76.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:49, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:49, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It looks like the wooden fence hangs a bit to the front, but IMO it's not seriously deformed. Quality is high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 17:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
*  Comment Thank you for your comment. The wooden sea wall is at an angle. That is how it should be.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:09, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 15:33, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 15:33, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:02, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 77.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--PJDespa 19:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:31, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:47, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:47, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 92.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Only the shadow is a very little bit disturbing. --Milseburg 16:23, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 89.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Cayambe 17:53, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Could you remove the spots in the sky? --Basotxerri 15:22, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done. spots removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:31, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 08:20, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 88.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 18:34, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 91.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It'not the easiest main object to realize a good perspective and this is well done. However the trees at the left part are leaning a bit to the right, but quality is high enough for Q1. --Michielverbeek 16:53, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
*  Comment Thank you for your comment. Do you want me to restore the background?--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
IMO it's good enough for QI, but I only give a possible improvement --Michielverbeek 19:15, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 90.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 18:02, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 17:26, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Granada 18:02, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted in cw direction --Poco a poco 15:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done. Correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:11, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 87.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:10, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:10, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 86.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:13, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:13, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:22, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good detail photo --Michielverbeek 21:52, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:44, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhododendron ponticum actm 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:00, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geranium cultivar lila. actm 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:04, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oranje Papaver orientale. actm 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Nice! A spot on the right of the tower... --Basotxerri 15:57, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done. spots removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 80.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There are some spots (not round, though) --Poco a poco 16:50, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Note: these are vague birds. Do you want me to remove them?--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:13, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 Support I will promote assuming that those are birds, but to be honest I couldn't say. --Poco a poco 07:09, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done. spots removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhododendron ponticum actm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geranium nodosum 'Clos du Coudray'. actm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 16:08, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allium schoenoprasum (Bieslook). actm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:16, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oranje Papaver orientale. actm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:16, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhododendron ponticum actm 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:11, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 84.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:18, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geranium cultivar lila. actm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PJDespa 16:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 81.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PJDespa 16:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:41, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhododendron ponticum actm 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality, --Fischer.H 16:12, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 21:13, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 01:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geranium-sanguineum. actm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 01:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Hortus Haren (actm) 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Hortus Haren (actm) 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:34, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PJDespa 21:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhododendron ponticum actm 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:51, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Hortus Haren (actm) 14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:49, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhododendron ponticum actm 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 17:51, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schokland. UNESCO-Werelderfgoed actm 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:08, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:52, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 16:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Hortus Haren (actm) 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 16:50, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Fischer.H 17:17, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:01, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Unfortunate lighting but OK for me. --Basotxerri 20:32, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
* Comment Correction WB.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 06:27, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Hortus Haren (actm) 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:15, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
This is so delicate and beautiful, viewed over the water along with the bokeh. I see this as a possible FP, but you could play with crops that might eliminate the bits of flower on the upper right that some people might object to. I'd be concerned such a crop might damage the composition in the lower right, though. I'd vote for this photo at FPC without any changes being made and might nominate it. -- Ikan Kekek 03:35, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
* Comment Sorry for my late response. Your remark had escaped me. I have now removed the disturbing flower stems.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:47, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:21, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:21, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Hortus Haren (actm) 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Hortus Haren (actm) 15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:32, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 17:35, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 15:38, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. But please check again for CAs, for eample top right. --XRay 15:38, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done. Ca’s removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:05, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:48, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Hortus Haren (actm) 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Hortus Haren (actm) 16.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. The image is OK but you can improve it: lower the blue channel a bit, slight gradient filter in the sky and give it more contrast (or maybe clarity). --Basotxerri 16:40, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews. --Agnes Monkelbaan 17:15, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Pea Haag' (actm) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:08, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I'd rather sacrifice a bit of sharpening for a softer background but in any case, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 16:10, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments. I will review the edited photo again. Agnes Monkelbaan

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Bad Birnbach' (actm).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 15:52, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 15:52, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Mr. Darcy' (actm) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:10, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortus Haren (actm) 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:10, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 19:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Rosengräfin Marie Henriette' (actm).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 16:27, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:56, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Camelot' (actm).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 15:32, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 15:32, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Matador' (actm).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 16:29, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 16:30, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Relax' (actm).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:28, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Marathon' (actm).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:39, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'sommerwind' (actm) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:18, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Kent' (actm).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good. Johannes Robalotoff 15:09, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 17:32, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:50, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 15:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Pea Haag' (actm) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 15:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa. Onbenaamde cultivar (actm) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa. Onbenaamde cultivar (actm) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:15, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Mr. Darcy' (actm) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:35, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 16:29, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:33, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 12:03, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:02, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:02, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Pink Knock Out' (actm) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:02, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:48, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Pink Knock Out' (actm) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 20:01, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:53, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa. Onbenaamde cultivar (actm) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:22, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harstastate Hegebeintum (actm) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:56, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harstastate Hegebeintum (actm) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:56, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:35, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:34, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harstastate Hegebeintum (actm) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:18, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:18, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:01, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:01, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:46, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:46, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harstastate Hegebeintum (actm) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:57, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Rosenprofessor Sieber' (actm).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harstastate Hegebeintum (actm) 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful and good image -- Spurzem 15:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Aspirin Rose' (actm) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 15:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harstastate Hegebeintum (actm) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:00, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:01, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrijhof in Ferwerd. (actm) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harstastate Hegebeintum (actm) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but above the tree there are several birds which appear like dust spots, can be corrected -- Llez 16:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done. Hopefully I shot all the birds from the air. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
OK now --Llez 04:50, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrijhof in Ferwerd. (actm) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 16:02, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harstastate Hegebeintum (actm) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 16:01, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 15:54, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa. Onbenaamde cultivar (actm) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 15:55, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrijhof in Ferwerd. (actm) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrijhof in Ferwerd. (actm) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:04, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuinen Mien Ruys (actm) 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:04, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrijhof in Ferwerd. (actm) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 16:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa. Rode cultivar (actm) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 16:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa. Rode cultivar (actm) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 16:43, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:55, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:58, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Blauwe Stad' (actm).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Excellent detail --George Chernilevsky 15:42, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 01:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrijhof in Ferwerd. (actm) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Sunblaze' (actm) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orchidee (phalaenopsis) (actm) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 20:33, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrijhof in Ferwerd. (actm) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 21:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orchidee (phalaenopsis) (actm) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 15:42, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrijhof in Ferwerd. (actm) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 15:46, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orchidee (phalaenopsis) (actm) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qiality --Llez 15:58, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harstastate Hegebeintum (actm) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 15:58, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrijhof in Ferwerd. (actm) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:53, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Aspirin Rose' (actm) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 18:54, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrijhof in Ferwerd. (actm) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 18:49, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harstastate Hegebeintum (actm) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 18:49, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agapanthus 'Senna'. Zaaddozen. (actm) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 15:33, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orchidee (phalaenopsis) (actm) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 15:34, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrijhof in Ferwerd. (actm) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:03, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eucomis pole-evansii. Familie Asparagaceae. (actm.) Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 15:54, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 15:54, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anthurium (Flamingoplant) (actm) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 17:25, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrijhof in Ferwerd. (actm) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 17:25, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eucomis pole-evansii. Familie Asparagaceae. (actm.) Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:50, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anthurium (Flamingoplant) (actm) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:50, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agapanthus 'Senna'. Zaaddozen. (actm) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:11, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harstastate Hegebeintum (actm) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 17:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anthurium (Flamingoplant) (actm) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:19, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrijhof in Ferwerd. (actm) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Yann 10:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kornwerderzand. (actm) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 10:49, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agapanthus 'Senna'. Zaaddozen. (actm) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:39, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harstastate Hegebeintum (actm) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:58, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogebeintum, Fries, Hegebeintum (actm) 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:58, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kornwerderzand. (actm) 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:13, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harstastate Hegebeintum (actm) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:13, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kornwerderzand. (actm) 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anthurium (Flamingoplant) (actm) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 October 2018 (UTC)