User talk:Adorkable16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Adorkable16!


File tagging File:Dscooo20.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dscooo20.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dscooo20.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 17:54, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File deletion warning
File:Dscooo20.jpg has been marked as violating policy, because it is considered unfree. This file has been, or will be soon deleted. The file is licensed under a license that does not permit unlimited redistribution, commercial use or the creation of derivative works. Wikimedia Commons is a free media repository, which means that unlimited redistribution, commercial use and the creation of derivative work must be allowed. See Commons:Licensing for more information. If you want to ask permission from the author of the file, please do so using a template from Commons:Email templates. For images, you may find it useful to read Commons:Image casebook.

Martin H. (talk) 19:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not recreate deleted content[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  sicilianu  svenska  suomi  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  +/−
Your image or other content, File:ShapeUp.JPG, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

Martin H. (talk) 20:31, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:57, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok, cool, can you tell me how please. --Adorkable16 (talk) 01:45, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adorkable16, are you the photographer of the image? If not you are probably not eligible for giving the image a free license that allows everyone inside and outside Wikimedi/Wikipedia to use the image for every purpose including commercial use. Thats the problem here. You marked the image as "all rights reserved by..." - thats exactly the oposite of what we mean with free images. Please read our licensing policy and provide a written permission from the owner to OTRS refering to the images name, than your image will be restored. But please dont recreate it. --Martin H. (talk) 09:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, that was indeed a missunderstanding, I restor you first upload, File:Dscooo20.jpg, to this upload YOU wrote: ALEX CAMPBELL INSTRUCTIONAL HAIRCUTTING DVDS 2007 All rights reserved. That does not leave any space for speculation and leeds me to speedy deletion. I restore it and you should please follow the instructions given you with my very first posting. If an image is published elsewhere with copyright restrictions and the copyright holder wants to publish the image on Wikipedia under a free license that allows everyone to reuse the image for every purpose the copyright holder must provide a written legal permission to OTRS to substantiate the copyright claim and validate the free license. --Martin H. (talk) 16:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Dscooo20.jpg is restored, please provide written permission that clearifies that you are officially represent alexccampell.com, that you are the creator (camera operator) of the photo or video File:Dscooo20.jpg and the legal holder of all copyrights and that you agree with the selected license {{GPL}}. You know that everyone, every person or company inside and outside Wikimedia can reuse the content under the terms of this license for every purpose including commercial use and the creation of derivative works based on this image. Thanks and sorry for the missunderstanding, the "All rights reserved" statement was too obvious for me. --Martin H. (talk) 16:20, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Im not interested in the image or the article, im interested in copyrights here on Wikimedia Commons. And please dont call me asshole and stay away from other insults, im doing this work as a volunteer like everyone here. Better you first read our scope to see, which great goal im protecting with my work. --Martin H. (talk) 16:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Oh, and p.p.s.: You wrote on a robbot accounts talkpage on Wikipedia: That picture was just a picture from a website that didn't even need permission --- this "from a website" is the far oposite of "Im the copyright holder". Everything is protected by the authors copyright, the camera operator, for the authors lifetime and 70 years after. Do you really understand copyrights?? I think no. Please provide a legal permission. There are no websites "dont even needing permission" - Everything needs permission, written! --Martin H. (talk) 16:30, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We need a permission that everyone, inside and outside Wikipedia/Wikimedia can reuse the image without asking the copyright holder again, for every purpose including every possible use like publications on newspaper, magazines, television, advertising, educational publications, onlinemedia, printmedia, ... everything. This permission is handled under a free license, for your photographic work or video sequence you selected GPL.
From your last posting I see, that you are not the holder of copyright, means the creator of the original video or photo. There is a large difference between seeing an image for free and a free image. Thats also the reason why many articles on Wikipedia dont have an image: because no free image exists.
You can concentrate on two things: Searching for an image on the web with copyright terms No rights reserved, means public domain, or Some rights reserved, with all economic rights released and derivative works permitted. You can also take a picture of a prominent person with this haircut here from Commons and crop the interesting part. Its not so easy with copyrights, but thats the scope of Wikipedia: Providing free knowledge that everyone can use for every purpose.
And thanks for showing me the missing "l". --Martin H. (talk) 16:40, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Google images is not a very good source, you should look at Commons:Free media resources or the advanced search http://www.flickr.com/search/advanced/ with the last three options only search for Creative Commons-licensed content, for commercial use and for derivative works checked. It might be very difficult to find directly for this special topic, it is maybe much easier to find some images of prominent or semi-prominent people with this haircut. The images are free for derivative works, means you can edit them like you want e.g. cropping the relevant parts. --Martin H. (talk) 16:48, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amy[edit]

I guess you're searching this Amy... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 02:40, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

lol no she's not my wife! I don't know her! The pictures were found on Flickr. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:20, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]