User talk:Abbedabb/Archive 2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Minecraft cube.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

kismalac 23:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 7c53437f9a27ba0542e424f65c8ec308[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Harbour of Genoa[edit]

Hello, you overcategorized Harbour of Genoa; be careful next time, please! (COM:OVERCAT). -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 11:04, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ESC[edit]

Hi! Thank you for taking and uploading the pictures from the ESC. -- Mathias Schindler (WMDE) (talk) 08:49, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

and also for videos - excellent work, thank you! -- Achim Raschka (talk) 10:44, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Félicitations pour cet excellent travail ! JÄNNICK Jérémy (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the pictures and videos from the Eurovision 2013, great job! You were the guy, who asked Emmelie on the winner's press conference to say "Hi, I'm Emmelie de Forest, I'm from Denmark and I'm the winner of the Eurovision Song Contest 2013"? Is that video already uploaded to Commons? ;-) --Timk70 (talk) 17:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that was me. Unfortunately I missed that perfect opportunity, because the camera would not focus properly. I just got the sound, but the video is useless. I'm trying to figure out a way to solve it. --/abbedabbtalk 19:26, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you all for your comments! --/abbedabbtalk 19:27, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:Emmelie_de_Forest_bored has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:09, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Gunnex (talk) 18:07, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elmo!.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GermanJoe (talk) 19:01, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Emmelie i Astrologimagasinet Horoskopet[edit]

Your original photo.

In a shop I stumbled on a Danish astrology magazine, Astrologimagasinet Horoskopet, and I believe that your picture or a very similar shot might have been used in it. You can see a picture of the front page here: [1]. To me your image and the front page image is the same, - just, cropped, mirrored and changed in the coloring.

If I remember correctly the frontpage foto is attributed to Camilla Utke Schiøler, who is googlable. With the minor examination of the magasin I did, I could see no attribution or mentioning of CC-BY-SA. Only to Utke.

There are images inside the magazine which, if my recollection is correct, had a similarity to photos you have taken.

Fnielsen (talk) 17:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tack så mycket! Thank you very much for this information. I will really look into this. I am flattered to see my photo on the cover of a magazine, but sad that it is not correctly attributed, and disgusted that it is a paper about astrology. I will try to get a copy of the paper. -abbedabbdisk 18:12, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Here you can clearly see it's the same photo. -abbedabbdisk 06:37, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undrar var någonstans du fotade detta kort? Kan det ha varit på Lärdomsgatan vid Chalmers Lindholmen? mvh Vogler (talk) 22:53, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Du, det mins jag faktiskt inte. Först tänkte jag att det var i Mölnlycke, men när jag tänker efter tror jag att det kan ha varit innomhus någonstans. Nej, jag minns faktiskt inte. Det var längesedan bilden togs.. -abbedabbdisk 08:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 02:34, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]